C.T v L.L.C.T (31058/2020) [2026] ZAGPPHC 924 (24 August 2026)

35 Reportability
Civil Procedure

Brief Summary

Appeal — Leave to appeal — Application for leave to appeal against judgment and order — Court finding no reasonable prospect of success on appeal — Compelling reasons for appeal not established — Application for leave to appeal dismissed without costs order due to respondent's pro bono representation.

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in
compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

CASE NO.: 31058/2020
(1) REPORTABLE: NO
(2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3) REVISED: NO
Date: 24 August 2026
E van der Schyff


In the matter between:

C T[...] APPLICANT

and

L L[...] C[...] T[...] RESPONDENT

In re:

L L[...] C[...] T[...] PLAINTIFF

and

C T[...] DEFENDANT

Delivered: This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic
file of this matter on CaseLines. In the event that there is a discrepancy between the date
the judgment is signed and the date it is uploaded to CaseLines, the date the judgment is
uploaded to CaseLines is deemed to be the date that the judgment is handed down.


JUDGMENT

VAN DER SCHYFF J

[1] The applicant seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order s handed down
on 14 July 2026.

[2] Section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 permits leave to appeal only
where the Court is of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable

2

prospect of success, or where some other compelling reason exists why the
appeal should be heard.

[3] I have considered the grounds of appeal and the submissions advanced on behalf
of the parties. Having reconsidered the judgment in light of all the grounds
advanced, I am not of the opinion that an appeal would have a reasonable
prospect of success. Nor has any other compelling reason been established why
an appeal should be heard.

[4] Since the respondent is represented on a pro bono basis, no costs order is granted
in her favour.

ORDER
In the result, the following order is granted:
1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2. No order as to costs.


____________________________
E VAN DER SCHYFF
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA


For the applicant: Mr. J Lazarus
Instructed by: LAZARUS JOSHUA ATTORNEYS INC.

For the respondent: Adv. I Vermaak-Hay SC
Instructed by: HENDRIK HAASBROEK ATTORNEYS

Date of the hearing: 21 August 2026
Date of judgment: 24 August 2026