Zanenza Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another v BMW Financial Services (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd (2025/011525) [2026] ZAGPJHC 861 (30 July 2026)

35 Reportability
Civil Procedure

Brief Summary

Appeal — Leave to appeal — Application for leave to appeal against summary judgment — Applicants failing to demonstrate any grounds that would lead to a different outcome — Application dismissed with costs — Court affirming the original judgment.

About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2026
>>
[2026] ZAGPJHC 861
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
Zanenza Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another v BMW Financial Services (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd (2025/011525) [2026] ZAGPJHC 861 (30 July 2026)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
Case Number:
2025-011525
(1) 
REPORTABLE: NO
(2) 
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3) 
REVISED: NO
30
July 2026
In
the matter between:
ZANENZA
HOLDINGS (PTY)
LTD
First Applicant
NZALO,
ZANDILE
Second Applicant
and
BMW
FINANCIAL SERVICES (SOUTH
AFRICA) PTY
LTD
Respondent
Judgment
in the application for leave to appeal
MODIBA J
[1]
The applicants seek leave to appeal this
court’s judgment and order of 14 April 2026, granting summary
judgment. The respondent
opposes the application.
[2]
I
have considered the grounds for appeal as set out in the applicants’
application for leave to appeal. I have also considered
the written
and oral submissions advanced on behalf of the applicants as well as
oral submissions advanced on behalf of the respondent,
guided by the
provisions in section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Court’s Act.
[1]
I find that none of the grounds of appeal relied on by the applicant
will yield a different outcome in the contemplated appeal

proceedings.
[3]
In the premises, the application stands to
be dismissed with costs. I therefore make the following order:
Order
1. The application is
dismissed.
2. The applicants shall
pay the respondent’s costs on the attorney and client scale.
JUDGE L.T. MODIBA
JUDGE OF THE HIGH
COURT,
JOHANNESBURG
Appearances
For
the Applicants:                                      

Adv N S Nxumalo
Instructed
by:                                              

Tshabalala Attorneys
For
the Respondent:                                   

Adv S F Fisher-Klein
Instructed
by:                                              

Velile Tinto & Associates
Date
of Hearing:                                         

18 June 2026
Date
of Judgment:                                      

30 July 2026
MODE
OF DELIVERY: This judgment is handed down electronically by
transmission to the parties’ legal representatives by email,

uploading on Caselines and release to SAFLII. The date and time for
delivery is deemed to be 10:00am on 30 July 2026.
[1]
Act 10 of 2013