IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
BRAAMFONTEIN CASE NO: J4638/02
2003-02-18
In the matter between
MOHLALA, TSHWARI PHINEAS Applicant
and
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
HARTMAN, JOHAN N.O. 3rd Respondent
4th Respondent
_______________________________________________________________
_
J U D G M E N T
_______________________________________________________________
_
REVELAS J:
1. This is an application for leave to appeal against a
judgment handed down on 29 November 2002 by me. At that
stage the applicant had launched urgent proceedings
seeking that the disciplinary proceedings instituted by
the first respondent against him. be stayed pending the
outcome of certain criminal proceedings regarding the
same allegations which were instituted on or about
18 November 2000. Assurances were given that these
proceedings would take place.
2. I declined to grant the relief sought by the applicant.
I have set out in a reasoned judgment why I did not grant
the relief. I have nothing to add to that judgment. I
have considered the matter, and in my view I do not
believe that there is a reasonable prospect that the
Labour Appeal Court would come to a different conclusion
than I had come to.
3. Consequently the application for leave to appeal is
dismissed with costs.
____________________
E. Revelas