Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd v Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5 (LM090Sep23) [2023] ZACT 79 (4 December 2023)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger — Approval of merger between Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd and Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5 — Attacq Waterfall Investment Company to increase its share in the Development Rights from 23.57% to 50% — Competition Commission assessing horizontal overlap and finding combined market share of less than 15% — No substantial prevention or lessening of competition identified — Public interest considerations regarding employment and ownership shareholding by historically disadvantaged persons (HDPs) found satisfactory — Merger unconditionally approved.

1
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM090Sep23
In the large merger between:
Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm
And
Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the
Waterfall Farm 5
Primary Target Firm
Panel: AW Wessels (Presiding Member)
T Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)
G Budlender (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 09 November 2023
Order issued on: 10 November 2023
Reasons Issued on: 04 December 2023
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
[1] On 10 November 2023, the Competition Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) unconditionally
approved the merger whereby Attacq Waterfall Investment Company
Proprietary Limited (“AWIC”) will increase its share in the development rights in
respect of two land parcels known as Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on portion 1 of the
Waterfall Farm 5 (“the Development Rights”).
Primary acquiring firm
[2] AWIC is wholly owned and controlled by Attacq Limited (“Attacq”). AWIC holds
and controls various real estate portfolios and development and leasehold rights
in Waterfall City. AWIC also holds a 23.57% indirect interest in Waterfall JVCO
115 (Pty) Ltd (“JVCO”). Attacq, which operates as a Real Estate Investment
competitiontribu nal
SOUTH AFRICA

2
Trust (“REIT”), is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Limited (“the
JSE”) and is not controlled by any single shareholder. Attacq controls the
following firms: Attacq Management Services Proprietary Limited (“AMS”),
AWIC, Attacq Ellipse (Pty) Ltd and Attacq the Mix (Pty) Ltd. Attacq, its
subsidiaries and all the firms directly and indirectly controlling it, will hereinafter
be collectively referred to as the “Acquiring Group”.
Primary target firm
[3] The primary target firm comprises a 50% share in the Development Rights. The
Development Rights are currently held by JVCO, a private company registered
in accordance with the laws of South Africa. JVCO is currently controlled by
Sanlam Life Insurance Limited (“Sanlam Life”), a public company registered in
accordance with the laws of South Africa, which holds a 76.43% stake in JVCO.
AWIC, the Acquiring Firm, holds the remaining 23.57% in JVCO.
[4] Sanlam Life is listed on the JSE and is not directly or indirectly owned by any
firm. JVCO wholly owns and controls the Development Rights. The Development
Rights do not control any firms. The Development Rights will hereinafter be
collectively referred to as the “Target Firm”.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[5] In terms of the proposed transaction AWIC will increase its share in the Target
Firm from 23.57% to 50%.
[6] The Acquiring Group submitted that its rationale for the proposed transaction is
that the shareholders agreement provides for the opportunity for AWIC to
increase its shareholding in JVCO (and hence in respect of the Development
Rights) to 50% (“the Option”). AWIC exercised the Option on 29 June 2022.
[7] The Target Firm submitted that the proposed transaction is a consequence of
the exercise of a call option by AWIC.

3
Competition assessment
[8] The Competition Commission (“Commission”) found that proposed transaction
gives rise to a horizontal overlap as the Acquiring Group owns a portfolio of light
industrial properties and the Development Rights will be developed into
industrial properties.
[9] Further, the merger parties have a pre-existing vertical relationship. AMS, the
Acquiring Group’s subsidiary, has been appointed to conduct development
management services and once the developments on Waterfall Farm are
completed, AMS will perform asset management and property management
services. According to the Commission’s assessment, it is unlikely that any
substantial foreclosure concerns will arise from this relationship as AMS will
continue to provide its development management, asset management and
property management services to other developing properties. Therefore, we do
not deal with this issue any further in these reasons.
[10] The Commission assessed the horizontal competition effects of the proposed
transaction in the market for rentable light industrial property within a 15 km
radius of the Target Firm’s rentable light industrial properties in Midrand.
[11] The Commission found that the merger parties will have a combined market
share of less than 15% in the abovementioned market.
[12] Having considered the above, and that there are viable alternatives, such as two
additional large industrial property developments (Simmer & Jack and
Randport), in the relevant market, we do not consider it likely that the proposed
merger will result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the
relevant market.
Public interest
Employment
[13] The merging parties submitted that there will be no adverse effect on
employment.

4
[14] The Target Firm does not have any employees, it comprises Development
Rights which have not yet been developed. JVCO, the seller, also does not have
any employees. The Commission engaged the employee representatives of the
Acquiring Group, who confirmed that there were no concerns raised by the
employees regarding the proposed transaction.
[15] Considering the above, we are of the view that the proposed transaction does
not raise any employment concerns.
Spread of ownership
[16] The merger parties submitted that the Acquiring Group has a 28.63%
shareholding by historically disadvantaged persons (“HDPs”) using a normal
flow-through principle and 33.47% based on the modified flow-through principle.
The shareholding is held by Attacq and is based on Attacq’s black economic
empowerment (“BEE”) certificate dated 29 September 2023 which expires on 28
September 2024.
[17] The Target Firm’s pre-merger HDP shareholding is 29.76%,1 based on the HDP
shareholding of the two shareholders pre-mergers, AWIC,2
and Sanlam.3
[18] The overall HDP shareholding in the Target Firm will increase to 30.73% post-
merger. The post-merger HDP shareholding is calculated as follows:
18.1. AWIC currently has a HDPs shareholding of 33.47% and AWIC will hold
50% of the shares in the Target Firm which means the HDP share in the
Target Firm attributable to AWIC is 16.73%, and
18.2. Sanlam Limited currently has a HDP shareholding of 28% and Sanlam will
hold 50% of the shares in the Target Firm which means the HDP
shareholding in the Target Firm attributable to 14%.
2 Attacq wholly owns AWIC, which in turn holds a 23.57% of the issued share capital of the seller, JVCO.
3 Sanlam holds 76.4% of the issued share capital of the seller, JVCO. Based on Sanlam’s BEE
certificate dated 9 March 2023, which expires 9 March 2024.

Other public interest issues
[19] The proposed transaction raises no other public interest issues.
Conclusion
[20] Given the above, we unconditionally approve the proposed transaction.
Mr Andreas Wessels
04 December 2023
Date
Prof Thando Vilakazi and Adv Geoff Budlender SC
Tribunal Case Manager:
For the Merging Parties:
For the Commission:
Theodora Michaletos
Justin Balkin and Preanka Gounden of ENSAfrica
Tamara Paremoer, Makati Seekane and Ratshi
Maphwanya
5