Northam Platinum Holdings Limited v Northam Platinum Limited (LM024May21) [2021] ZACT 31 (12 July 2021)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Unconditional approval of merger between Northam Platinum Holdings Limited and Northam Platinum Limited — Merger aimed at restructuring BEE ownership within the group — Competition Commission found no significant increase in market shares or structural changes in relevant markets for platinum, palladium, rhodium, and gold — No public interest concerns raised, including employment impacts — Tribunal concluded merger unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact public interest.

1


COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM024May21


Northam Platinum Holdings Limited (Primary Acquiring Firm)
and
Northam Platinum Limited (Primary Target Firm)


REASONS FOR DECISION


[1] On 2 July 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger
between Northam Platinum Holdings Limited (“Northam Holdings ”) and Northam
Platinum Limited (“Northam”).

[2] Northam Holdings is a newly incorporated entity, wholly controlled by Northam. The
transaction is essentially a restructure within the group to unwind Northam’s existing
Black Economic Empowerment (“BEE”) ownership and implement a new BEE
structure.1 Post-merger, Northam will become a subsidiary of Northam Holdings .
Northam Holdings will acquire direct control over Northam and will be listed on the
Johannesburg Stock Exchange (“JSE”). Northam will be delisted from the JSE.

[3] Northam is a primary producer of three platinum group metals: platinum, palladium and
rhodium as well as gold.2 Northam’s primary customers are the motor manufacturing,
jewellery and other industries.

[4] Northam is not controlled by any one firm and wholly owns five firms in South Africa.
Northam also holds a single “N” share in Zambezi Platinum (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Zambezi”)
as a protective right.

[5] The Competition Commission (“Commission”) found horizontal overlaps in the global
markets for the mining and production of the following four metals, and concluded that
the proposed merger does not result in an accretion in market shares, or a change in
the structure of the market, as indicated below:


1 The transaction is the second component in a composite transaction comprising Compo nents A and
B. Component A, accelerates the maturity of the existing BEE ownership transaction for existing HDP
shareholders in Zambezi Platinum RF (Pty) Ltd (an entity in which Northam’s BEE interests are held)
and unlocks value for these shareholders. Component B entails the implementation of a new vendor-

financed BEE ownership structure for Northam, with emphasis on participation by broad-based BEE
ownership inter alia by employees and communities.
2 Northam mines these metals from its Zondereinde mine in the Limpopo Province, and its Booysendal
North and South mines in the Mpumalanga Province.

2
Global markets for the mining
and production of:
Accretion Post-merger market
share
Platinum None ± 6%
Palladium None ± 3%
Rhodium None ± 7%
Gold None ± 0.01%

[6] In respect of the platinum, palladium and rhodium markets, the Commission found that
the merged entity would remain constrained by other big players such as Anglo
Platinum, Impala Platinum and Sibanye -Stillwater. In the gold market, the merged
entity would remain constrained by other big players such as Goldfields and AngloGold
Ashanti.

[7] The merging parties provided an unequivocal statement that the proposed transaction
would have no effect on employment, particularly that it will not result in retrenchments
or job losses. The merger also raises no other public interest concerns.

[8] We note that the proposed transaction promotes a greater spread of ownership by
facilitating greater participation in the Northam Group by Northam employees, Northam
communities and participants of the HDP SPV. This is because the Commission found
that the composite transaction will result in a net increase in the ownership stakes of
HDPs in the Northam Group from 31.4% to 32.2% .3 As no mining rights will be
transferred, none of Northam’s mine’s Social Labour Plans (SLP) will be transferred.
The Commission found that the merger will not impact Northam’s ability to deliver on
its SLP objectives.

[9] No third party raised any concerns.

[10] We conclude d that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or
lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public
interest.




12 July 2021
Ms Mondo Mazwai Date
Mr Andreas Wessels and Prof. Imraan Valodia concurring

Tribunal Case Manager: P Kumbirai
For the Merging Parties: R Wilson and L Makhubedu of Webber Wentzel
For the Commission: Z Siyo and M Aphane




3 This HDP ownership excludes shareholding by other HDPs already invested in Northam.