Anglo American PLC v De Beers SA (12/LM/Feb12) [2012] ZACT 24 (13 April 2012)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Anglo American PLC acquiring additional shares in De Beers SA — Anglo American seeks to increase its shareholding in De Beers from 45% to 85% — No horizontal overlap in activities between the merging parties — Proposed transaction unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition — No negative impact on employment or public interest concerns — Merger approved unconditionally by the Competition Tribunal.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 12/LM/Feb12
In the matter between:
Anglo American PLC Acquiring Firm
And
De Beers SA Target Firm
Panel : Andreas Wessels (Presiding Member)
Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Taki Madima (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 11 April 2012
Order issued on : 11 April 2012
Reasons issued on : 13 April 2012
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1] On 11 April 2012 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) approved the
merger between Anglo American PLC and De Beers SA. The reasons
for approval follow below.
1

Parties to transaction
2] The primary acquiring firm is Anglo American PLC (“Anglo American”),
a public company with a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange
and secondary listings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, Swiss
Exchange, Botswana Stock Exchange and the Namibian Stock
Exchange. Anglo American is not controlled by any shareholder.
3] The primary target firm is De Beers SA (“DBSA”) a private company
incorporated in Luxembourg. The De Beers Group (“De Beers”)
operating companies are indirectly owned through DBSA. DBSA has
both A shares and B shares in issue. The A shares in DBSA are all
owned by DB Investments SA (“DBI”). DBI is a private company
incorporated in Luxembourg and is owned by (i) Anglo American (45%
indirectly through Anglo Diamond Investments Sarl); (ii) CHL Holdings
Ltd (“CHL”), representing the Oppenheimer family interests (40%
indirectly through Central Investments DBI SA (“CIDBI”), a subsidiary
of CHL); and (iii) the Government of the Republic of Botswana (15%
indirectly held as to 11.05% through Debswana Investments SA and
3.95% through Debswana Investments’ minority shareholding in
CIDBI).
Activities of merging parties
4] Anglo is a diversified mining company with operations in various parts
of the world. Its worldwide activities include the mining of platinum
group metals, coal, base and ferrous metals, industrial minerals and
diamonds. Anglo American’s existing interest in diamonds is held
wholly through its 45% joint controlling stake in De Beers.
5] The primary activities of De Beers involve the exploration, mining,
processing, valuing and sale of rough diamonds. Together with its joint
venture partners De Beers is the world’s leading rough diamond
producer (by value) with mining operations in Botswana, Namibia,
South Africa and Canada.
2

Proposed transaction and rationale for transaction
6] The proposed transaction entails CHL agreeing to make an offer to sell
its entire indirect 40% interest in De Beers to the other two
shareholders of De Beers. The proposed transaction, in essence,
results in Anglo American increasing its shareholding in De Beers from
45% to up to 85%. Therefore the proposed transaction represents an
increase in shareholding from joint to sole control by Anglo American of
De Beers.
7] According to Anglo American the proposed transaction represents a
continuation of its strategy to focus on world class mining assets with
long lives, low cost profiles and clear expansion potential.
Impact on competition
8] There is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging
parties in South Africa or globally. Pre-merger Anglo American’s only
interest in diamonds is through its existing 45% interest in De Beers
and it is not engaged in any other activity which competes with the
activities of De Beers. Since there is no overlap in the merging parties’
activities, and also no significant vertical relationships between them,
the proposed transaction is unlikely to lead to a substantial prevention
or lessening of competition in any relevant market.
Public interest
9] The merging parties confirmed that there will be no negative impact on
employment as a result of the proposed transaction. 1 Furthermore, the
proposed deal raises no other public interest concerns.
1 Merger record, pages 14, 58 and 75.
3

CONCLUSION
10]We approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.
____________________ 13 April 2012
Andreas Wessels DATE
Medi Mokuena and Taki Madima concurring
Tribunal researcher: Thabo Ngilande
For the merging parties: Nortons Inc
For the Commission: Grace Mohamed
4