Investec Bank Ltd v Ferro Industrial Products (Pty) Ltd (54/LM/Jul11) [2011] ZACT 82 (20 October 2011)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Large merger between Investec Bank Limited and Ferro Industrial Products (Pty) Ltd approved by the Competition Tribunal — Investec to acquire 49% of Ferro's issued share capital — No overlap in activities of the merging parties and no competition concerns identified — Public interest concerns also absent — Merger approved without conditions.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No:54/LM/Jul11
In the matter between:
Investec Bank Limited Acquiring Firm
And
Ferro Industrial Products (Pty) Ltd Target Firm
Panel : Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)
Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)
Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 21 September 2011
Order issued on : 21 September 2011
Reasons issued on : 20 October 2011
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1] On 21 September 2011 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) approved the large
merger between Investec Bank Limited (“Investec”) and Ferro Industrial Products
(Pty) Ltd (“Ferro”). The Tribunal’s reasons for approving the transaction are set
out below.
1

The Parties to the transaction
2] The primary acquiring firms are Investec Bank Limited, a firm incorporated under
the laws of the Republic of South Africa and the Management Shareholders of
Ferro Industrial Products. Investec is controlled by Investec Limited, 1 a firm listed
on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
3] The primary target firm is Ferro Industrial Products (Pty) Ltd, 2 a firm incorporated
in terms of the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Ferro is controlled by
Blackstar Group Plc (“Blackstar”) which currently holds 54% share interest
therein with the remaining 46% being held by the Management Shareholders.
4] The parties have concluded a Sale of Shares and Claims Agreement in terms of
which (i) Investec will acquire 49% of the issued share capital in Ferro together
with a cession of the loan account claims held by Blackstar against Ferro; and (ii)
Certain of the Management Shareholders will acquire 5% of the issued share
capital in Ferro.
5] Post merger, Investec will have control of Ferro with its 49% shareholding while
the Management Shareholders will collectively hold 51%.
The activities of the parties
6] The acquiring firm, Investec is an international specialist banking and asset
management group providing a diverse range of services and financial products
to a niche client base mainly in the United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa.
7] Investec operates through 6 main divisions namely Asset Management; Wealth
and Investment; Property Activities; Private Banking; Investment Banking and
Capital Markets.
8] The target firm, Ferro manufactures plastics, glass colouring, enamels, ceramics
1 http://www.investec.co.za/#home.html
2 http://www.ferrosa.co.za/
2

and powder coatings and was initially a subsidiary of Ferro USA until it was
bought out from its USA parent company in 1990.
9] Ferro operates through 5 divisions namely Powder Coatings division; Glass
Decorating and Colouring division; Plastic Masterbatch division; Enamels division
and the Spectrum Ceramics division.
The Rationale
10] Investec previously held a controlling interest in Ferro before disposing of it to
Blackstar in 2008. Investec therefore sees this transaction as investment in a
familiar firm that has proven to be very well managed and profitable.
11] Blackstar wants to exit from its investment in Ferro and sees this transaction as a
means of achieving that objective.
The Relevant Market and the Impact on Competition
12] There is no overlap in the activities of the parties and even though Investec holds
interests in chemical companies, particularly in the supply of resins and chlor-
alkali derivative products used for water treatment, it does not hold any interests
in the industrial chemical sector in which Ferro operates.
13] The Commission also found that there is no possibility of vertical integration
between the activities of the merging parties.
14] In light of the above and the Commission’s analysis, the proposed transaction will
not likely lead to preventing or lessening competition in the relevant markets.
Public Interest
15] The merging parties submitted that the proposed transaction raises no public
interest concerns.
3

Conclusion
16] In light of the Commission’s analysis and recommendations, the merger does not
raise any major competition concerns and furthermore no public interest
concerns arise.
17] Accordingly, the above merger is approved without conditions.
____________________ 20 October 2011
N Manoim DATE
A Ndoni and M Mokuena concurring.
Tribunal Researcher: Songezo Ralarala
For the Merging Parties: Paul Cleland from Werksmans Attorneys
For the Commission: Lindiwe Khumalo
4