Newco v Squires Foods (Pty) Ltd (22/LM/Feb08) [2008] ZACT 41 (29 May 2008)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Acquisition of restaurant businesses — Newco acquiring 20 restaurant businesses from Squires Foods as going concerns — No overlap in activities between acquiring and target firms in South Africa — Transaction unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in relevant markets — Approval granted without conditions.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
    
               Case No: 22/LM/Feb08
In the matter between:
Newco Acquiring Firm
And
Squires Foods (Pty) Ltd Target Firm
Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member), M Mokuena (Tribunal
Member) and  U Bhoola (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 09 April 2008
Order issued on : 09 April 2008
Reasons issued on : 29 May 2008
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1]On   9   April   2008 ,   the   Tribunal   approved   the   merger   between   Newco   and  
Squires Food (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for approval follow.
The transaction and parties
2]The   transaction   involves   the   acquisition   by   Newco   of   20   restaurant  
businesses   from   Squires   Foods   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Squires   Foods”)   as   going  
concerns.   Sansquires   (Pty)   Ltd   is   selling   nine   restaurants,   Squires   Foods  
seven,   Squires   Pietersburg   (Pty)   Ltd   one,   Squires   Kimberly   (Pty)   Ltd   one,  
Sunset Bay Trading (Pty) Ltd one and Introprops 1017 CC one restaurant. 1
3]The Primary acquiring firm, controlled by Retailcorp LLC, is a newly acquired  
shelf   company   incorporated   in   the   company   laws   of   South   Africa.   Dubai­
1  Although the acquisition of the businesses of Sunset Bay and Itroprops constitute small  
mergers as they are not linked with the Squires Foods transaction, the Commission decided  
to consider them as part of the transaction in order to analyze the effect on competition.  
Sansquire, Squires Kimberly and Squires Pietersburg are all controlled by Squires Foods. 
1

based company Retailcorp LLC will hold 50% in Newco and the remaining  
shares will be held by Nadesons (Pty) Ltd and Mr H Adams jointly holding  
30% and a consortium made up of existing shareholders of Squires Foods  
(Pty) Ltd jointly holding the remaining 20% shareholding in Newco.
Rationale for the transaction
4]The transaction constitutes the first step in a joint venture between Retailcorp  
and the shareholders of Squires Foods. The Primary acquiring group wishes  
to take the Squires Brand to Dubai while at the same time establish its retail  
apparel brand, as a new entrant, in South Africa. It is the view of the merging  
parties   that   the   transaction   will   allow   them   to   maximise   the   synergies  
between the Retailcorp and Squires Foods’ businesses and to leverage the  
intellectual capital held by each.
Impact on competition 
5]The   transferred   businesses   are   restaurant   businesses   located   in   casinos,  
entertainment complexes and shopping  centres in a number of geographic  
locations throughout South Africa. 2 The geographic market is defined as the  
local market; customers tend to dine in the areas close to where they stay.  
The restaurants are situated at the V&A Waterfront in Cape Town, Sun City  
Casino and Resort, the Boardwalk in Port Elizabeth, the Wild Coast Casino  
and   Hotel   near   Port   Edward,   Meropa   Casino   near   Polokwane,   Kimberley  
Casino,   Carnival   City   Casino   in   Brakpan,   and   in   various   suburbs   of  
Johannesburg.
6]The acquiring group does not operate any restaurants in South Africa. There  
is thus no overlap in the activities of the acquiring and the target firms within  
South Africa. 3 
2  For a list of businesses see Rekord page 109 
3  As a consequence of the amalgamation of the businesses of the target firms (Squires  
Foods, Introprops and Sunset Bay) there is an overlap in respect of the provision of  
restaurant services within the target firms. However, the businesses are situated in different

geographic markets and there is accordingly no overlap in the activities of the primary target  
firms.
2

7]The   target   firm   is   also   a   tenant   of   the   primary   acquiring   firm   in   the   V&A  
Waterfront.4 However the vertical effect of this relationship on competition is  
minimal since  the income received  from the primary target  for rentals was  
less   than   1%   of   the   acquiring   firms   total   rentals   received.   The   vertical  
relationship   between   the   merging   parties   is   therefore   unlikely   to   result   in  
foreclosure.    
8]The transaction is thus unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition  
in the relevant product markets.
Conclusion
9]There are no significant public interest issues and we accordingly approve  
the transaction without conditions.
____________________                           29 May 2007
Y Carrim                          Date
M Mokuena and U Bhoola concurring.
Tribunal Researcher:  R Badenhorst
For the merging parties: Hofmeyr Herbstein Gihwala Inc
For the Commission: M Mohlala and M Matsimela
4  The target business is Morton’s on the Wharf.
3