Pangbourne Properties Ltd (Pty) Ltd v iFour Properties Ltd (27/LM/Mar08) [2008] ZACT 39 (21 May 2008)

55 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Unconditional approval of merger between Pangbourne Properties Ltd and iFour Properties Ltd — Pangbourne seeks to increase its shareholding in iFour from 41.45% to 100% — Transaction does not substantially lessen competition or raise public interest issues — Merger approved without conditions.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case NO: 27/LM/Mar08
In the matter between
Pangbourne Properties Ltd (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring firm
And
iFour Properties Ltd     Primary Target Firm
Panel :   D   Lewis   (Tribunal   Member);   Y   Carrim   (Tribunal   Member)   and   N  
Manoim (Tribunal Member)
Heard on  : 07 May 2008
Decided on : 07 May 2008
Reasons Issued : 21 May 2008
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On   07  May   2008   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a  Merger  Clearance   Certificate  
approving   the   merger   between   Pangbourne   Properties   Ltd   and   iFour   Properties   Ltd  
unconditionally. The reasons for the approval appear below. 
Parties
[2] The   primary   acquiring   firm   is   Pangbourne   Properties   Ltd   (“Pangbourne”),   a   listed  
company   incorporated   in   terms   of   the   company   laws   of   the   Republic   of   South   Africa.  
Pangbourne is not controlled by a single shareholder. 1 
[3] The primary target firm is iFour Properties Ltd (“iFour”), a company incorporated  
under the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. iFour is indirectly controlled by  
1 Pangbourne’s major shareholders are Stanlib Investment Solutions (16.09%), Standard Bank of  
South  Africa   (Pty)   Ltd   (5.38%),  Panya   Investments   (Pty)   Ltd   (7.99%),  Old   Mutual   Life   Assurance  
Company (South Africa) Ltd (5.94%), Broker (Pty) Ltd (RMB) (6.41%) and Resilient Property Income  
Fund Ltd (9.54%).
1

Pangbourne (the primary acquiring firm in the instant transaction), with 35.3%  
shareholding.2 
Transaction 
[4] In   terms   of   the   structure   of   the   transaction,   Pangbourne   intends   to   increase   its  
shareholding in iFour 3 from 41.45% to 100%. On completion of the transaction, iFour will be  
wholly controlled by Pangbourne.
Rationale
[5] Pangbourne submits that as a result of the prevailing market conditions and investor  
preferences, it has decided to consolidate its property portfolio in order to create a larger  
portfolio, extract cost­savings and synergies and maximise funding efficiencies.
[6] The transaction represents an opportunity for iFour’s unitholders to be part of a much  
larger property fund with more diversification, less risk exposure and a greater potential for  
future growth.  
Parties’ Activities
[7] Pangbourne   and   iFour   are   property   loan   stock   companies   listed   on   the   JSE   Ltd  
under   the   “Financial­Real   Estate”   category.   Both   firms   own   a   property   portfolio   which  
consists   of   industrial   properties,   office   properties   and   retail   properties   throughout   South  
Africa.     
Competition Analysis
[10] The transaction results in an overlap between the activities of the merging parties in  
respect   of   office,   retail   and   industrial   properties.   However,   this   overlap   will   not   lead   to   a  
substantial lessening or prevention of competition as the transaction represents a move by  
Pangbourne from joint control in iFour to sole control.
Public interest
[12] The   transaction   does   not   give   rise   to   any   public   interest   issues   and   is   approved  
without conditions.
2 iFour’s other major unitholders include   Broker (Pty) Ltd RMB (17.72%), Securities Lending/BOE  
Online Share Trading (6.67%) and ABSA Commercial Property Finance (Pty) Ltd (5.48%).
3 Pangbourne acquired joint control in iFour in 2003.
2

_______________   21 May 2008
D Lewis       Date
Tribunal Member
Concurring: Y Carrim and N Manoim
Tribunal Researcher :  I Selaledi
For the merging parties :  Vani Chetty Competition Law (Pty) Ltd
For the Commission :  Makgale Mohlala and Thaba Mavhase           
3