Liberty Star Consumer Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Finlar Foods (Pty) Ltd (11/LM/Jan08) [2008] ZACT 35 (19 May 2008)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Liberty Star Consumer Holdings (Pty) Ltd acquiring control over Finlar Foods (Pty) Ltd — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger on 12 March 2008, finding that it would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets for sauces and value-added chicken products. The merger was assessed against market shares and competitive dynamics, revealing low barriers to entry and significant countervailing power from large retailers. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction raised no public interest concerns and approved it unconditionally.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
      
          Case No:  11/LM/Jan08
In the matter between:
Liberty Star Consumer Holdings (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firm  
And
Finlar Foods (Pty) Ltd  Target Firm
Panel: D   Lewis   (Presiding   Member),   N   Manoim   (Tribunal   Member)  
and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member)
Heard on:  12 March 2008
Order issued on:  12 March 2008   
Reasons issued on: 19 May 2008
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1]    On   12   March   2008   the   Tribunal   approved   the   merger   between   Liberty   Star  
Consumer Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Finlar Foods (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for approval  
follow below.
The transaction and Parties
2]    The   transaction   involves   the   acquisition   of   control   by   Liberty   Star   Consumer  
Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“Liberty Star”) over Finlar Foods (Pty) Ltd (“Finlar Foods”) in a  
series of interdependent and interrelated steps.
1

3]    Liberty Star is jointly controlled by Royal Bafokeng Libstar (Pty) Ltd 1 and Lereko  
Metier   Capital   Growth   Fund. 2    Liberty   Star   controls   a   number   of   companies,  
however, for purposes of this transaction only the following subsidiaries are relevant  
Dickon Hall Foods (Pty) Ltd, Montagu Foods (Pty) Ltd and Ribworld (Pty) Ltd and  
Rialto Foods.
4]    The target firm is Finlar Foods. It is controlled by Afrosi Holdings BV (”Afrosi”).  
Afrosi and Finlar Foods jointly control New Nations Pizza Africa (Pty) Ltd, which in  
turn controls Green Valley Food Products (Pty) Ltd (“Green Valley Food”). In turn,  
Green Valley   Food  controls  Hans  Pirow  Properties  (Pty) Ltd.  Finlar  Foods  is  also  
involved in a joint venture with Mullins Food Inc, a company registered in the United  
Sates, called Mullins Food Products SA (Pty) Ltd (“Mullins SA”).
Rationale for the transaction
5]    Liberty Star regards Finlar Foods as an investment that represents a good fit with  
the   firm’s   food   solutions/out­of­home   platform.   According   to   the   target   firm   the  
transaction will enable it to achieve favourable BEE status.
Relevant Market
  Finlar   Foods,   the   target,   is   a   manufacturer   of   value­added   red   and   white   meat  
products in the convenience food sector for clients such as McDonalds and KFC. Its  
joint   venture  company  Mullins   SA   also  manufactures  various   sauces  on   behalf   of  
brand owners such as Kraft and Nestle.
6]    Liberty Star, through its subsidiaries Dickon Hall and Montagu, like Finlar Foods  
also   acts   as   a   contract   manufacturer   of   sauces   for   brands   such   as   “Mrs   Ball’s  
Chutney   as   well   as   “in­house”   brands   owned   by   some   of   the   large   retailers.   Its  
subsidiary   Ribworld   imports   chilled   and   frozen  meat   products   which   it   supplies   to  
franchise chains, retailers and restaurants.

franchise chains, retailers and restaurants. 
7]    The Competition Commission identified two relevant product markets, the market  
1  Royal Bafokeng Libstar (Pty) Ltd is ultimately controlled by The Royal Bafokeng Nation.
2  Lereko   Metier   Capital   Growth   Fund   is   ultimately   controlled   by   Lereko   Investors   (Pty)   Ltd   and  
Metier Investment and Advisory Services (Pty) Ltd.
2

for   the   manufacture   of   sauces   such   as   tomato,   spicy     mayonnaise   ?   and   salad  
dressings (excluding marinades) and the market for the manufacture of value­added  
chicken products. The geographic markets in both cases are defined as national.
8]    The Commission estimates that the merged entity will have a market share of  
9.26% in the market for the manufacture of sauces and 18.5% in the market for the  
manufacture of value­added chicken products. 
Competition analysis
9]    We will discuss each product market separately.
The market for the manufacture of sauces
10]    The merging parties Dickon Hall, Montagu and Mullins SA are all competitors in  
the market for the manufacturing of sauces such as mayonnaise, chutney, tomato  
and salad dressings.   Dickon Hall and Mullins SA are pure contract manufacturers  
and do not own any brands of their own.  They are thus purely service providers to  
brand   owners   who   sell   their   sauces   to   the   retail   trade.   Montagu   is   a   contract  
manufacturer   that   not   only   manufactures   sauces   on   contract   but   also   owns   and  
manufactures its own “Montagu” brand of sauces for the retail as well as the fast food  
trade. The market shares of the merging parties are Dickon Hall 6.28%, Montagu  
1.39% and Mullins SA 1.59%. Post the merger the merged entity will hold a market  
share of 9.26%.
11]    Barriers to entry within this market are low and there are numerous players in  
this market. Not only do the small independent service providers compete with each  
other but they also compete with the brand owners’ large “in­house” manufacturing  
establishments.  
12]    Countervailing  power exists in  the  form of  large retailers  who own “in­house”  
brands and who can switch their manufacturing contracts to other service suppliers  
as well as the brand owners who have the ability to manufacture their brands “in­
house”.

as well as the brand owners who have the ability to manufacture their brands “in­
house”. 
13]    In   light   of   the   above   we   find   that   the   transaction   is   unlikely   to   substantially  
3

prevent or lessen competition in this market.  
The market for the manufacture of value­added chicken products
14]    Finlar Foods provide value­added chicken products to McDonald’s, County Fair  
and Woolworths. It holds a market share of 18%. Its main competitors are Famous  
Brands (Steers) with a market share of 17%, Rainbow Chicken with a market share  
of 29% and Astral (Early Bird) with a market share of 16%.  Ribworld, the acquiring  
firm, only holds a market share of 0.5%.  Ribworld is mainly a distributor of imported  
chicken products and its largest customers are Maxi’s and St Elmo.
15]    The   increase   in   concentration   (or   delta)   as   a   result   of   the   transaction   is  
insignificant, namely 18 points, which is far below the delta of 50 that competition  
agencies generally regard as problematic. 3
16]    The   transaction   is   therefore   unlikely   to   prevent   or   lessen   competition   in   this  
market.
Vertical integration
17]    Liberty Star (through one of its subsidiaries Rialto Foods) supplies Finlar Foods  
with various tomato products. Rialto holds a small market share of only 5% and it is  
accordingly unlikely that the transaction would give rise to foreclosure effects. 
Conclusion
18]    The transaction does not raise any public interest concerns and is accordingly  
approved unconditionally.
  19 May 2008
____________________
3  The HHI index measures the concentration ratio.
4

Y Carrim  Date
Concurring: D Lewis and N Manoim
Tribunal Researcher:  R Badenhorst
For the merging parties: Metier
For the Commission: M Dasarath
5