Saudi Telecom Company v Oger Telecom Ltd (29/LM/Apr08) [2008] ZACT 29 (7 May 2008)

50 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Saudi Telecom Company acquiring 35% of Oger Telecom Ltd — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between Saudi Telecom Company and Oger Telecom Ltd unconditionally on 16 April 2008. The acquiring firm, STC, is not active in South Africa, and the transaction does not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition, with no significant public interest issues identified. The merger was deemed beneficial for both parties, allowing STC to enter emerging telecom markets and enabling OT to leverage STC's experience.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case NO: 29/LM/Apr08
In the matter between
Saudi Telecom Company Primary Acquiring firm
And
Oger Telecom Ltd Primary Target Firm
Panel : Y Carrim (Tribunal member); M Mokuena (Tribunal member) and T  
Orleyn (Tribunal member)
Heard on  : 16 April 2008
Decided on : 16 April 2008
Reasons Issued :  07 May 2008
Reasons for decision
Approval
[1] On  16  April  2008  the  Competition  Tribunal  issued   a  Merger  Clearance   Certificate  
approving   the   merger   between   Saudi   Telecom   Company   and   Oger   Telecom   Ltd  
unconditionally. The reasons for the approval of the merger appear below.
Parties
[2] The   primary   acquiring   firm   is   Saudi   Telecom   Company   (“STC”),   a   company  
incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. STC is controlled by the Public  
Investment Fund, a Saudi government owned entity. 1
[3] The primary target firm is Oger Telecom Ltd (“OT”), a company incorporated under the laws  
of the Dubai International Financial Centre. OT is jointly controlled by Saudi Oger Ltd (“SO”), with  
1 The Public Investment fund holds 70% shares in STC. The remaining shares are owned
by the Public Pension Agency with 5%, the General Organisation for Public Insurance with
5% and 20% is owned by the public.
1

35% shares and Oger Telecom Saudi Arabia Ltd with 45%. 2 
[4] In South Africa, OT controls Oger Telecom (South Africa) Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“OTSA”) and  
Lanun   Securities   SA   (“Lanun”).   OTSA   together   with   Lanun   have   75%   shareholding   in   3C  
Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd (“3C”) 3, which in turn, controls Cell C (Pty) Ltd (“Cell C”). 4
Transaction
[5] In terms of the proposed transaction, STC intends to acquire 35% of the shares in  
OT. Upon completion, STC will have joint control in OT. 
Parties Activities
[6]  STC offers fixed and mobile voice data and services as well as internet services to  
personal,   homes   and   enterprise   users   in   Saudi   Arabia   and   internationally.   It   does   not  
provide any products or services in South Africa. 
[7] OT provides telecommunications services in Turkey and Middle East, operating  
fixed­line, mobile communications and internet access businesses. OT also owns a major  
regional ISP which operates in Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and Jordan. In South Africa, OT  
operates through Cell C. 
[8] Cell C provides mobile voice and mobile data telephone services. It offers a wide  
range of mobile cellular products and services, including pre­paid and contract airtime  
packages. 
Rationale for the transaction
[9] This transaction offers STC with an opportunity to enter into two of the largest and  
most advanced emerging telecom markets, i.e. South Africa and Turkey.
[10] OT hopes to benefit from STC’s broad and in-depth experience in
operating fixed-line and mobile networks in Saudi Arabia, bringing significant
2 OTSA holds 60% and Lanun holds 15%. The remaining 20% of shares of OT are held by  
various institutional investors, with each holding less than 5%.
3 The remaining 25% shareholding in 3C is held by CellSAf, a consortium of historically
disadvantaged persons.
4 Cell C wholly owns and controls Cell C Service Provider Company (Pty) Ltd and Cell C Property

Holdings Company (Pty) Ltd. In addition, Cell C also jointly controls Virgin Mobile South Africa. 
2

value and also support further development in its operations.
Competition Analysis
[11] There is an overlap between the activities of the merging parties in respect of the  
provision  of mobile telecommunications.  There is, however, no geographic overlap in the  
activities of the merging firms as the acquiring firm is not active in South Africa.
[12] Based on the above, the transaction will not result in a substantial lessening or  
prevention of competition.
Conclusion
[13] There   are   no   significant   public   interest   issues   and   we   accordingly   approve   the  
transaction without conditions.
___________________   07 May 2008
Y Carrim Date
Tribunal Member
M Mokuena and T Orleyn concurring.
Tribunal Researcher :  I Selaledi
For the merging parties :  Deneys Reitz and Werksmans
For the Commission :   Makgale   Mohlala   and   Mogalane   Matsimela  
(Mergers &          Acquisitions)
3