Lithotech Holdings Ltd and Rotolabel (Transvaal) (Pty) Ltd (132/LM/Dec07) [2008] ZACT 16 (20 February 2008)

50 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Lithotech Holdings Ltd acquiring Rotolabel (Transvaal) (Pty) Ltd — Competition Tribunal approving merger unconditionally — Acquiring firm to acquire 100% of target firm's share capital — Parties operate in the manufacture and supply of self-adhesive labels — Post-merger market share of 9% deemed insignificant to raise competition concerns — No public interest issues identified.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 132/LM/Dec07
In the matter between:
Lithotech Holdings Ltd Acquiring Firm
And
Rotolabel (Transvaal) (Pty) Ltd  Target Firm
Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal Member) and   U  
Bhoola (Tribunal Member)
Heard On  : 06 February 2008
Decided on  : 06 February 2008
Reasons Issued on : 20 February 2008
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 05 February 2008 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate  
approving the merger between Lithotech Holdings Ltd and Rotolabel (Transvaal) (Pty) Ltd  
unconditionally. The reasons appear below.
Parties
[2] The acquiring firm is Lithotech Holdings Ltd (“Lithotech”) 1  a company incorporated  
under the laws of South Africa. Lithotech is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bidvest Group Ltd  
(“Bidvest Group”) and forms part of the Bidvest Bidpaper Plus division. 2  
[3] The target firm is Rotolabel (Transvaal) (Pty) (“Rotolabel”), a company incorporated  
under the laws of South Africa. Rotolabel is jointly controlled by Richard Simon Gilbert and  
the Zagsy Cat Trust (“the Trust”), who together own 65% of the shares in Rotolabel. 3 
1 Lithotech   controls   the   following   firms:   Lithotech   (Pty)Ltd;   Lithotech   Afric   Mail   (Cape)(Pty)   Ltd;   Lithotech  
Corporate (Pty)Ltd and Lithotech Solutions (Pty)Ltd
2 Bidvest is a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. It has a
number of subsidiaries in South Africa and abroad.
3 The rest of the shareholders of Rotolabel are as follows: Anthony Roy William Clarke,
with 13.5%; Ronald Harry Dyer, with 13.5% shares; Jacobus Lodewicus Maritz, with 4%
shares and Grant Watson with 4% shares. Rotolabel does not directly or indirectly control
1

Transaction
[4]  In terms of the proposed transaction Lithotech will acquire 100% of the share capital  
in Rotolabel. 
Rationale
[5] Lithotech   considers   the   transaction   as   part   of   a   broader   diversification   plan   of   its  
Bidpaper Plus division. It is anticipated that having a facility such as Rotolabel would elevate  
Bidpaper   Plus   division’s   position   in   the   market,   while   also   bringing   additional   skills   and  
equipment.   The   target   firm’s   shareholders   are   selling   their   shares   because   the   majority  
shareholders are approaching retirement and have identified this transaction as the best way  
to realise their investment.
Parties’ Activities
[6] Lithotech conducts the print and paper conversion services of the Bidvest Group. 4   It  
offers   a   range   of   products   and   services   which   include   labels   and   labelling   systems,   the  
manufacturer sales and distribution of customer communications, business forms, document  
management and other commercial products. The parties submitted that with regard to the  
labelling  products business,  the Bidpaper Plus division  has two label operations, namely,  
Lithotech   Labels   (which   manufactures   decorative   self­adhesive   labels)   and   Lithotech  
Manufacturing Spartan (which manufactures blank or limited colour self adhesive labels).
[7] Rotolabel produces decorative self­adhesive labels which are largely applied to Fast  
Moving Consumer Goods(“FMCG”) and supplies mainly to Woolworth’s packaging labels  
and the wine and pharmaceutical sectors.
Relevant Market
[8] In its analysis  of the proposed transaction the Commission  found that there is an  
overlap in the activities of the merging firms in respect of the manufacture and supply of self­
adhesive labels, specifically in the decorative self­adhesive product label. The Commission  
defines the market as the market for the manufacture and supply of self­adhesive labels.  
any other firm.

any other firm.
4 Bidvest Group operates through Bidpaper Plus, Bidfreight, Bidserve, BidFood, Bid
Industrial and Commercial Services, Bid Auto and Bid Corporate Services and its activities
are: catering supplies, food and allied products; travel, financial and related services;
freight-forwarding, clearing, distribution, warehousing and allied activities; stationary,
office furniture, supplies and related products;linen,rental,laundry, cleaning and other
services; electrical supplies, security and related products; motor retail and related
services; and printing and stationary products which are conducted by Bidpaper Plus
2

The parties argued that the market could be defined further into the market for decorative  
self­adhesive labels and the market for plain  self­adhesive labels.  At the hearing Mr Neil  
Bircht, Chief  Executive Officer of Lithotech Holdings,  submitted that the manufacturing of  
decorative   self­adhesive   labels   required   additional   colours   and  varnishes   which   were   not  
required   in   the   plain   self­adhesive   labels. 5  The   merging   parties   relied   on   this   Tribunal’s  
approach   to   the   labels   market   in   Nampak   Ltd/Malbak   Ltd.     In   that   case   the   Tribunal  
distinguished between self­adhesive and wet glued labels. 6    In our view the processes for  
the manufacture of decorative labels, while requiring more colour and varnish, did not seem  
significantly   different   from   that   of   self­adhesive   blank   labels.     Accordingly   we   define   the  
relevant market as the market for the manufacture and supply of self­adhesive labels.  7
Competition Analysis
[9] According to the Commission the merging parties would have a 9% combined post  
merger market share for the manufacture and supply of self adhesive labels nationally. Pre­
merger,   Lithotech   and   Rotolabel   have   small   market   shares,   estimated   at   2%   and   7%  
respectively. The accretion in the market share would thus be only 5%.   The Commission  
further submitted that this market share is insignificant to raise any competition concerns.  In  
addition, the transaction does not raise any public interest issues.
Conclusion
[10] Based   on   the   above,   we   find   that   the   transaction   will   not   result   in   a   substantial  
lessening or prevention of competition in the relevant market and is accordingly approved  
unconditionally.
___________________ 20 February 2008
Y Carrim  Date
Tribunal Member
N Manoim and U Bhoola concurring.
5 See page 3 of the transcript.
6 See Tribunal case number 29/LM/May02.

5 See page 3 of the transcript.
6 See Tribunal case number 29/LM/May02.
7 This is supported to some extent by the fact that both the Commission and the merging parties rely on turnover  
figures of self­adhesive labels as a whole to estimate the merged entities market share. See page 50 of the  
record.
3

Tribunal Researcher :  J Ngobeni
For the merging parties : Bowman Gilfillan   
For the Commission : Mahale Mohlala
4