Pangbourne Properties Limited and Portion 118 of the farm Vogelfontein No.84 (99/LM/SEP07) [2007] ZACT 101 (11 December 2007)

55 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Mergers and acquisitions — Approval of property merger — Pangbourne Properties Limited proposed to acquire Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 from Friedshelf 221 (Pty) Ltd — The merger resulted in a combined market share of 4.96% in the light industrial property sector in the Boksburg East node — Tribunal found that the merger was unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the property market and raised no significant public interest concerns — Unconditional approval granted for the transaction.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No.: 99/LM/SEP07
In the matter between:
Pangbourne Properties Limited                                  Primary    Acquiring Firm
and
Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84                        Primary Target Firm
______________________________________________________________________
Panel : DH Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal 
Member), and U Bhoola (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 7 November 2007
Decided on : 11 December 2007  
REASONS FOR DECISION
Approval
[1] On 7 November 2007 the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the property  
merger between Pangbourne Properties Limited and Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No.  
84.
The Parties
[2] The   primary   acquiring   firm   is   Pangbourne   Properties   Limited   (“Pangbourne”)   and   the  
primary target property is Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84 (“T & B Boksburg”) which  
is owned by Friedshelf 221 (Pty) Ltd (“Friedshelf”).
[3] Pangbourne’s overall portfolio consists of industrial, retail and office properties  
throughout South Africa, and the target property T & B Boksburg is a light industrial property  
situated in the Boksburg East node.
The Transaction
1

[4] In terms of the proposed transaction,  Pangbourne intends to acquire from Friedshelf,  
Portion 118 of the Farm Vogelfontein No. 84. The rationale for Pangbourne is to improve the  
distribution of its property portfolio, and for the shareholders of Friedshelf, the transaction will  
allow them to realize the value of their investment.
The Relevant Geographic  Market
[5] The Tribunal’s approach in defining the relevant geographic market in property mergers  
has been on the basis of nodes in which different geographic areas that compete with each  
other are grouped, which vary for the different types of properties, and should sufficiently be  
close to justify the conclusion that they should be treated as relevant geographic markets. 1
[6]  An overlap in this merger exists in relation to light industrial properties in the Boksburg  
East node. Pangbourne already owns various light industrial properties within a 5 kilometer  
radius of the Boksburg East node which includes; PVC, Anderbolt 03, Anderbolt 04, Anderbolt  
07 and Anderbolt 09. 2  T & B Boksburg as mentioned above, is a light industrial property  
situated in the Boksburg East node.
Competition Evaluation
[7]   According to the market share estimates provided by the merging parties; pre­merger  
Pangbourne   has   2.90%,   and   T   &   B   Boksburg   has   2.06%   market   share.   The   market   share  
accretion is 2.06%, resulting in a post merger market share of 4.96% of light industrial property  
in the Boksburg East node. This is clearly insignificant to raise any competition concerns.
Conclusion
[8] We   are   satisfied   that   the   proposed   transaction   is   unlikely   to   substantially   prevent   or  
lessen competition in the property market generally, including light industrial property situated in  
the Boksburg East node.   There are no significant  public  interest concerns. Accordingly,  the  
proposed transaction is unconditionally approved.
_______________                       11 December 2007

_______________                       11 December 2007
D Lewis                                                                                               Date
Presiding Member
N Manoim  and U Bhoola  concur  in the judgment of D Lewis
1 Primegro Properties Ltd and Growthpoint Properties Ltd 29/LM/Jun03
2 All of these properties fall under light industrial classification except Anderbolt 04 which is
a heavy industrial property
2

Tribunal Researcher: L Xaba
For the Merging Parties :  Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs
For the Commission :  M Mashaba
(Mergers and Acquisitions)
3