Blue Label Investments (Pty) Ltd and Prepaid Company (Pty) Ltd & Others (72/LM/Jul07) [2007] ZACT 81 (30 October 2007)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Unconditional approval of merger between ListCo and various target firms including The Prepaid Company (Pty) Ltd — ListCo, a newly established firm with identical shareholders to Blue Label Investments (Pty) Ltd, seeks to acquire control over target firms to enhance its position in the telecoms industry — No significant competition concerns identified as the merged entity's market share remains low and competition from major players persists — Tribunal concludes that the merger does not substantially lessen competition in the relevant market.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
   Case No: 72/LM/Jul07
In the matter between:                                                       
ListCo
Blue Label Investments (Pty) Ltd         Acquiring Firm
And
The Prepaid Company (Pty) Ltd
House of Business Solutions
Cellfind (Pty) Ltd
African Prepaid Services (Pty) Ltd
Polsa Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Oxigen South America Limited
Virtual Voucher (Pty) Ltd
Budding Traders
Premet Cellular (Pty) Ltd
The Hub Pretalk (Pty) Ltd             Target Firms
Panel : D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal 
Member) and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) 
Heard on : 26 September 2007
Order Issued : 26 September 2007
Reasons Issued: 30 October 2007
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1] On   26   September   2007,   the   Tribunal   unconditionally   approved   the   merger  
between ListCo and Blue Label investments (Pty) Ltd  andthe Prepaid Company  
(Pty) Ltd and various target firms. The reasons for approving the transaction  
follow.

The parties
2] The primary acquiring firm is ListCo (“ListCo”), a newly established company.  
ListCo has been established  by the same shareholders that own Blue Label  
Investments (Pty) Ltd (“BLI”). At the hearing, the parties submitted that ListCo  
will   be   structurally   identical   to   BLI   with   identical   shareholders   and  
shareholdings.1  Shares   in   BLI   are   held   by   Intwesi,   an   empowerment  
consortium, (with a 37% shareholding), Brett Levy (with a 20% shareholding),  
Mark   Levy   (with   a   20%   shareholding),   Investec   (with   a   3%   shareholding),  
Marapa Trust (with a 2,5% shareholding), the rest of the shares being  owned  
by management minorities. 2 No single shareholder controls BLI and no single  
shareholder controls ListCo. BLI has more than twenty subsidiaries. 3
3] The primary target firms are The Prepaid Company (Pty) Ltd (“TPC”), House of  
Business   Solutions   (“HOBS”),   Prepaid   Services   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Africa   Prepaid”);  
Polsa   Holdings   Limited   (“Polsa”);   Oxigen   South   America   Limited   (“Oxigen”);  
Virtual  Voucher (Pty)  Ltd;  Budding   Trade (“Budding  Trade”);  Premet   Cellular  
(Pty) Ltd (“Premet”); and The Hub Pretalk (Pty) Ltd (“The Hub”).
Rationale and description of the Transaction
4] The transaction involves the re­structuring and listing of BLI.   BLI intends to  
develop   and   expand   its   current   core   business   strategies   by   acquiring  
companies   that   provide   products   and   services   within   the   broader   telecoms  
industry  and  to list   on the JSE  Securities  Exchange. 4    It  intends  to  buy out  
shareholders in its existing subsidiaries, and/or in companies in which it has  
minority interests. 
5] The transaction is effected through a series of inter­conditional and interrelated  
1  See transcript page 2.
2  The BLI Group consists of Brett Levy, Mark Levy, Investec, the Marapa Trust, Sean Kaplan,  
and Selwyn Diamond.

and Selwyn Diamond.
3  BLI  Group’s   subsidiaries   include   Blue  Label   Investment  (“BLI”),   Ventury   Group  (Pty)   Ltd  
(“Ventury”),   Friedshelf   748   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Friedshelf”),   Matrix   Investments   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Matrix”),  
Friedshelf 771 (Pty)  Ltd (“Friedshelf 771”), Kwikpay SA  (Pty)  Ltd (“Kwikpay”),  The  Prepaid  
Company   (Pty)   Ltd   (Pty)   Ltd   (“TPC”),   Blue   Label   One   (Pty)   Ltd   (“BLO”),   Prepaid   TV   and  
Utilities (Pty) Ltd (“Prepaid TV”); and Gold Label Investments (Pty) Ltd (“GLI”).
4  The   firms   submitted   that   the   target   firms   offer   a   variety   of   innovative   products   that  
complement each other and if combined in one group, will offer a rich bouquet of products and  
services to consumers.
  2

steps which result in ListCo, a newly incorporated company, acquiring control of  
the   primary   target   firms.   ListCo   will   then   be   listed   on   the   JSE   Securities  
Exchange. The transaction steps can be summarised as follows: 
[5.1] ListCo, a newly incorporated company with identical shareholders and  
shareholdings to BLI, will acquire the entire issued share capital of BLI from its  
current   shareholders   in   exchange   for   shareholding   in   itself.   Pursuant   to   the  
implementation of this step, BLI will be a wholly owned subsidiary of ListCo.
[5.2] BLI will unbundle all its shares held in all the companies that it holds more than  
50% to ListCo by way of distribution  in specie.  These subsidiaries include TPC  
(69.4%), GLI (75%), Prepaid TV (51%), BLO ((75%), and Friedshelf (100%).
[5.3] ListCo   will   then   acquire   shares   in   House   of   Business   Solutions   (“HOBS”).  
HOBS houses two non controlled entities of BLI namely Gold Label (20%), and  
Datacel (67%). 5 
[5.4]  ListCo will acquire the remaining shares in TPC from the current shareholders  
of TPC, 6 in exchange for shares in itself. As a result, TPC will become a wholly  
owned   subsidiary   of   ListCo.   TPC   will   then   acquire   all   the   shares   in   the  
controlled and non­controlled entities such that it holds 50% plus one share in  
each of the following entities – Cellfind, Africa Prepaid, Polsa, Oxigen, Virtual  
Voucher, Budding Trade, Matragon, Premet and the Hub. Pursuant to this step  
TPC will hold more than 50% of the issued share capital in all its investments  
and will thereafter unbundle all the shares in its subsidiaries to ListCo. 
The parties’ activities   
Primary acquiring firm
6] ListCo is a newly established company, and does not provide any products or  
services.BLI,   however,   is   involved   in   the   distribution   and   trading   business  
focusing   on   the   supply   of   prepaid   secure   electronic   tokens   of   value   to

focusing   on   the   supply   of   prepaid   secure   electronic   tokens   of   value   to  
5  In a letter dated 25 September 2007, the parties submitted to the Tribunal that because of  
commercial   considerations   and   to   avoid   a   tax   leakage,   the   acquiring   firm   has   decided   to  
acquire   shares   in   HOBS   rather   than   acquiring   the   underlying   assets   in   Gold   Label   and  
Datacell, as previously contemplated. Thus, HOBS replaced Gold Label and Datacell as a  
target firm.
6  The   current   shareholders   of   TPC   are   BLI   (with   a   69.6%   shareholding)   and   Shotput  
Investments (Pty) Ltd with a 30.4% shareholding). See record page 22­23.  
  3

wholesalers,   financial   service   providers,   corporate   and   independent   retailers  
and petroleum. They also provide technology direction and leadership for BLI  
and   they   currently   hold   technology   for   the   enablement   of   prepaid   television  
management and distribution. Prepaid TV is also planning to enter the market  
for the sale of prepaid electricity.
Primary target firms
7] For  our  purposes,   the  only   relevant   transaction   for  competition   evaluation   is  
that between TPC and Virtual Voucher. In terms of the transaction steps, TPC  
will   acquire   sole   control   in   Virtual   Voucher   and   TPC   will   later   unbundle   its  
shareholding to ListCo. Currently TPC owns 15% of Virtual Voucher and does  
not   control   it. 7  The   activities   of   TPC   and   Virtual   Voucher   overlap   in   the  
distribution of airtime in South Africa. There is also vertical integration between  
these two companies in that Virtual Voucher purchases airtime from TPC. 
8] The activities of TPC and Virtual Voucher are discussed below. No competition  
concerns arise in respect of the other target firms.
TPC
9] Through its various subsidiaries, TPC is involved in the distribution and trading  
business focusing on the supply of prepaid secure electronic tokens of value to  
wholesalers, financial services providers, corporate and independent retailers  
and petroleum outlets.TPC operates through the following three divisions:
[9.1] TPC Virtual   distributes electronic prepaid products utilizing various technology  
mechanisms to ensure accurate, efficient and auditable end to end consumer  
delivery transactions. These include bulk database warehousing and delivery  
solutions,   pin   generation   solutions,   merchant   bulk   printing   solutions,   value  
redemption platforms and electronic competition solutions for various prepaid  
product applications.
[9.2] TPC Starter Pack Division   distributes cellular starter packs to major retailers,

[9.2] TPC Starter Pack Division   distributes cellular starter packs to major retailers,  
7  No single shareholder controls Virtual Voucher. The current shareholders of Virtual Voucher  
are   TPC   (with   a   15%   shareholding),   Malo   Investments   and   Finance   CC   (with   a   16%  
shareholding),   Peter   Alexander   Zuur   (with   a   10%   shareholding),   Klaus   Wendel  Johannsen  
(with a 15% shareholding), Anthony Robert Pitout (with a 15% shareholding), Joseph Andrew  
Roxburgh (with a 14% shareholding), and Alan John Erasmus (with a 15% shareholding).
  4

wholesalers and individuals.
[9.3] TPC   Retail   Division   provides   cellular   telephony   solutions   and   value   added  
services to major retailers and smaller merchants.
Virtual Voucher
10] Virtual Voucher is focused on supplying electronic vouchers mainly to Engen  
sites. Its technologies are integrated directly into the Engen till systems. Virtual  
Voucher also provides terminals where required.
Competition analysis 
Horizontal analysis
11] The activities of the merging parties overlap in the market for the distribution of  
airtime including pre­paid, post paid, subscription, starter packs, fixed line and  
mobile.   The   parties   compete   nationally   and   their   customers   are   spread  
throughout South Africa.   Hence, the relevant horizontal market is the market  
for the distribution of airtime in South Africa.
12] The tables below show the estimated market shares of the market players as  
determined by the volume and the value of the airtime that is sold.
Table   1   Market   share   figures   for   the   national   market   for   the   distribution   of  
airtime based on volume of airtime sold
Company Market   share   based   on   volume   of  
airtime sold (%)
Vodacom 40.11
MTN 16.71
TPC Group 12.53
Smartcall 10.45
Telkom 9.87
Cell C 5.22
Autopage Cellular 1.25
Nashua Mobile  1.21
Virgin Mobile 1.17
Virtual Voucher <1
Total 100
Source: Merging parties
Table   2   Market   share   figures   for   the   national   market   for   the   distribution   of  
  5

airtime based on value of airtime sold
Source: Merging parties
13] As can be seen from the tables above, the merging parties’ combined market  
share is estimated to be approximately 13% based on value of airtime sold and  
approximately 7% based on volume of airtime sold. These market shares are  
low and do not raise competition concerns. In addition, the merged entity will  
face   competition   from   prominent   market   players   such   as   Vodacom,   MTN,  
Telkom, Cell C, Smart Call, Virgin Mobile and Autopage Cellular.
Vertical Analysis 
Virtual Voucher and TPC
14] The Commission identified three relevant vertical product markets implicated by  
this  transaction.   The   first   of   these   is   the   market   for   the   supply   of   airtime   in  
which   TPC   operates.   Virtual   Voucher   purchases   its   airtime   from   TPC.   The  
second of these is the market for software solutions in which ITEX operates.  
ITEX, a subsidiary of BLI, provides software solutions and it is anticipated that  
post merger Africa Prepaid will use ITEX technology. Finally, the Commission  
identified   the   market   for   software   solutions   where   Matragon   operate.   Polsa  
currently uses Matragon software in exchange for a licence fee.
15] The   market   for   software   solutions   where   ITEX   operates   and   the   market   for  
software   solutions   in   which   Matragon   operates   do   not   raise   competition  
concerns as Africa Prepaid and Polsa do not have business activities in South  
Africa. 
 
Company Market   share   based   on   value   of  
airtime sold (%)
Vodacom 27.17
Telkom 20.14
MTN 19.98
Autopage Cellular 8.05
Nashua Mobile 7.79
TPC Group 6.21
Cell C 4.8
Smartcall 4.8
Virgin Mobile <1
Virtual Voucher <1
Total 100
6

16] The only vertical market that may raise competition concerns is the market for  
the supply of airtime in which Virtual Voucher purchases airtime from TPC. Pre­
merger TPC  held  15%  of  the shareholding  of  Virtual  Voucher,  and  BLI  held  
69%   of   the   shareholding   of   TPC.   Currently,   Virtual   Voucher   purchases  
approximately   99%   of   its   airtime   requirements   from   TPC.   Virtual   Voucher’s  
purchases  from  TPC   constitute  approximately  0.6%  of   TPC’s   total  supply   of  
airtime. The pre­merger vertical relationship between TPC and Virtual Voucher  
will   continue   post­merger. 8  Customer   foreclosure   concerns   do   not   arise  
because Virtual Voucher is not a major customer of TPC.  Its airtime purchases  
from   TPC   account   for   less   than   1%   of   TPC’s   total   sales.   TPC’s   major  
customers include large stores with strong purchasing power such as Pick and  
Pay,   Shoprite,   Metcash,   Spar   and   Pep   Stores.   Furthermore,   TPC   faces  
competition from all the major suppliers or airtime such as Vodacom, Telkom,  
MTN, Cell C, Smart Call, Nashua Mobile and Virgin Mobile
17] Accordingly   the   transaction   is   unlikely   to   substantially   lessen   or   prevent  
competition.  
Public Interest 
18] There are no public interest issues.
Conclusion
19] The merger is approved unconditionally. 
________________ 30 October 2007
Y Carrim  DATE
Tribunal Member
D Lewis and N Manoim concur in the judgment of Y Carrim
Tribunal Researcher:  R Kariga
8  See record page 319.
  7

For the merging parties:  Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs Attorneys  
For the Commission : M Mohlala and M Matsimela (Mergers and Acquisitions)
  8