Barclays Plc and ABN Amro Holding N.V. (60/LM/JUN07) [2007] ZACT 53 (13 August 2007)

50 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Proposed merger between Barclays PLC and ABN AMRO Holding N.V. — Barclays seeks to acquire 100% of ABN AMRO shares — Minimal overlap in South African market for corporate banking and financial services — Tribunal finds no substantial lessening of competition or public interest issues — Merger approved unconditionally.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
                   Case No.: 60/LM/JUN07
In the matter between:
BARCLAYS PLC                                  Primary    Acquiring Firm
and
ABN AMRO HOLDING N.V                                            Primary Target Firm
_______________________________________________________________
Panel : DH Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal 
Member), and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 8 August 2007
Order issued on: 8 August 2007
Reasons issued on:   13 August 2007  
REASONS FOR DECISION
APPROVAL
[1]   The   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance   Certificate   on   08  
August   2007,   approving   without   conditions   the   proposed   merger   between  
Barclays PLC (“Barclays”) and ABN AMRO Holding N.V (“ABN AMRO”). The  
reasons are as follows:
THE MERGER TRANSACTION
[2] The   primary   acquiring   firm   is   Barclays   PLC   (“Barclays”),   a   public  
company which is incorporated in England and Wales, and which its principal  
place of business is London,  United Kingdom.   Barclays has only one direct  
subsidiary;   Barclays   Bank   PLC,   which   is   also   incorporated   in   England   and  
Wales, and has a substantial number of subsidiaries worldwide, which includes  
a substantial number in South Africa. 1
1  These include among others; Absa Bank Limited; AbsaAsset Management nominees (Pty)

[3] The  primary  target  firm   is   ABN   AMRO   Holding  N.V   (“ABN   AMRO”),   a  
public  company   which   is   incorporated  in  the  Netherlands,   where  its   principal  
business   place   is   also   found.     ABN   AMRO   also   has   numerous   subsidiaries  
worldwide, except in South Africa where it operates a branch in Johannesburg,  
Sandton.
[4] Barclays   intends   to   acquire  100%   of   the   shares   in   ABN   AMRO   either  
directly   or   through   subsidiary,   and   in   exchange   that   ABN   AMRO’s   existing  
ordinary  shareholders  will  acquire  48%  of the shares in the combined entity.  
That way Barclays’ existing ordinary shareholders will own 52% of the shares in  
the combined entity, while ABN AMRO’s existing ordinary shareholders will own  
the balance of 48% of the shares in the combined entity.
[5] Approval by the banking regulator is not required as ABN AMRO is not a  
registered bank in South Africa but a branch of a foreign bank. 
RATIONALE FOR THE TRANSACTION
[6]  The rationale for this merger appears to be Barclays’ desire to expand its  
scale globally.
  THE RELEVANT MARKET
[7] In   South   Africa   Barclays   operates   mainly   through   ABSA,   and   ABN  
AMRO’s operation scale and activities are minimal in South Africa. This is an  
international   merger,   however   the   effects   on   the   South   African   market   are  
trifling.  The parties’ activities reflect a clear but limited overlap in the segments  
of financial services and corporate banking. At the hearing we were advised that  
ABN   AMRO   was   principally   in   the   South   African   market   to   provide   a   local  
service to its international clients, who did business in this country. It had also  
expanded to provide services to some other corporate clients, but it would seem  
that this business is small.
COMPETITION EVALUATION
[8] There is no reason to delve in the details of the market share analysis in

[8] There is no reason to delve in the details of the market share analysis in  
this   merger   as   the   effect   thereof   in   the   relevant   South   African   markets   are  
glaringly trivial. The overall post merger market share in the national market for  
the provision of corporate banking and financial services are low.
CONCLUSION
Ltd; Absa Fleet Services Ltd; Absa Group Ltd; Allan Grey Property trust Nominees (Pty)Ltd;  
Alberton Industrial Properties (Pty) Ltd;  Barclays International Funds (South Africa),etc.
2

[9] We are satisfied that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in a  
substantial   lessening   or   prevention   of   competition   both   in   the   national   and  
international   markets   for   the   provision   of   corporate   banking   and   financial  
services.   There   are   no   public   interest   issues.   We   accordingly   approve   the  
proposed transaction unconditionally.
_______________
N Manoim 
Tribunal Member
D Lewis and M Mokuena  concur  in the judgment of N Manoim.
Tribunal Researcher: L Xaba
For Barclays PLC : V Koovejee (Deneys Reitz)
For ABN AMRO : R Labuschagne (Bowman and Gilfillan)
For the Commission : M Mohlala and I Selaledi 
(Mergers and Acquisitions)
3