FBC Nominees No1 (Pty) Ltd & Another and SA Airlink (Pty) Ltd (47/LM/May07) [2007] ZACT 46 (17 July 2007)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Tribunal approving merger between FBC Nominees No 1 (Pty) Ltd, Coronation Capital (Pty) Ltd, and SA Airlink (Pty) Ltd — Transaction arising from debt restructuring to strengthen SA Airlink's balance sheet — No significant public interest issues or retrenchments anticipated — Tribunal finding that the merger unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
       
              
 Case No: 47/LM/May07
In the matter between:
FBC Nominees No1 (Pty) Ltd                                                      Acquiring Firm
Coronation Capital (Pty) Ltd
And
SA Airlink (Pty) Ltd                                                                    Target Firm
Panel : D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal
Member) and  Y Carrim (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 12 June 2007
Order issued on : 12 June 2007
Reasons issued on : 17 July 2007
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1]On 12 June 2007 ,  the Tribunal approved the merger between FBC Nominees  
No   1   (Pty)   Ltd,   Coronation   Capital   (Pty)   Ltd   and   SA   Airlink(Pty)   Ltd.   The  
reasons follow below.
The Transaction
2]The primary acquiring firms is FBCF Nominees No 1 (Pty) Ltd (“FBCF”) and  
Coronation   Capital   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Coronation”).   FBCF   is   a   wholly   owned  
subsidiary   of   Nedbank   Group   Limited   (“Nedbank”),   which   is   ultimately  
controlled   by   Old   Mutual   plc.   Coronation   is   a   wholly   owned   subsidiary   of  
Coronation Investments and Trading Limited, an unlisted public company with  
various subsidiaries.
1

3]The primary target firm is SA Airlink (Pty) Ltd (“SA Airlink”). Its shareholders  
are:
 Osprey Airline Investments (Pty) Ltd 45.90%
 Roger Arnold Foster 19.35%
 Barrie James Webb 19.35%
 South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 10%
 Osprey Airline Holdings (Pty) Ltd   5.40%
4]The proposed transaction arises out of a debt restructuring exercise which  
will   result   in   each   of   Nedbank   and   Coronation   subscribing   for   33.5%  
shareholding   in   SA   Airlink.   SA   Airlink   is   a   client   of   both   Nedbank   and  
Coronation Capital which has, due to the negative effect that the events of 11  
September   2001   has   had   on   the   aviation   industry,   received   temporary  
financial  assistance  from them.   Nedbank  and Coronation   will  each  acquire  
shares in SA Airlink in order to settle the amounts owed to them and will as a  
result   of   this   settlement   acquire   negative   control   over   SA   Airlink   as  
contemplated in section 12(2)(g) of the Act.
5] Post the transaction the shareholding in SA Airlink is likely to be: 1
 Nedbank Ltd (through FBCF) 33.5%
 Coronation Capital 33.5%
 RA Foster 23%
 BJ Webb 10%
6]The merging parties believe that the proposed transaction should strengthen  
SA Airlink’s balance sheet and assist it to grow organically.
1 In the event that South African Airways does not accept that the call option for its 10%  
shareholding pre the transaction has been validly exercised and it does not follow its rights in  
terms of the proposed recapitalization, the parties anticipate that the likely shareholding post  
the recapitalization will be:
Nedbank 32.6%
Coronation 32.6%
RA Foster 22.33%
BJ Webb   9.73%
SAA   2.74%   
2

The relevant market and the impact on competition
7]SA Airlink provides scheduled air services linking smaller communities to the  
major hubs in South Africa and the SADC region. FBCF has previously not  
traded,   Nedbank   is   a   registered   bank   and   Coronation   is   involved   in  
investment   banking.   Although   there   is   no   overlap   in   the   activities   of   the  
merging   parties   both   Nedbank   and   Coronation   leases,   in   terms   operating  
lease agreements, certain aircraft to SA Airlink. However these arrangements  
are made in the ordinary course of their business of financing. 
8]The   proposed   transaction   is   therefore   unlikely   to   substantially   prevent   or  
lessen competition in any market.
Public interest issues
9]There   are   no   significant   public   interest   issues   and   no   retrenchments   are  
envisaged as a result of the proposed transaction.
____________________                           17 July 2007
D Lewis                           Date
N Manoim and Y Carrim concurring.
Tribunal Researcher:  R Badenhorst
For the merging parties: Natalie Browne (Cliffe Dekker)
For the Commission: Makgale Mohlala and Marlon Dasarath 
3