McCarthy Limited and Inyanga Motors (Pty) Ltd (22/LM/Feb07) [2007] ZACT 32; [2007] 1 CPLR 201 (CT) (8 May 2007)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Unconditional approval of merger between McCarthy Limited and Inyanga Motors (Pty) Ltd — Tribunal finding that the merger would not substantially lessen competition in the relevant market — Post-merger market shares assessed and deemed not to raise significant competition concerns — No public interest issues identified.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
   Case No: 22/LM/Feb07
In the matter between:                                                       
McCarthy Limited        Acquiring Firm
And
Inyanga Motors (Pty) Ltd               Target Firm
Panel : N Manoim (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member), 
and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 25 April 2007
Decided on : 25 April 2007
Reasons Issued: 8 May 2007
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1] On 25 April 2007, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between  
McCarthy Limited and Inyanga Motors (Pvt) Ltd. The reasons for approving the  
transaction follow. 
The parties
2] The   primary   acquiring   firm   is   McCarthy   Limited   (‘MCL’),   a   company  
incorporated under the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. 1 
1   MCL controls Kunene Motor Holdings Limited; Autohaus Centurion (Pty) Ltd, McCarthy  
Investments (Pty) Ltd, Eliance (Pty) Ltd and GAZ Motor Corporation Southern Africa (Pty)  
Ltd. In addition MCL owns a number of motor vehicle related insurance firms, property and  
investment firms and firms active in the provision of financial services. These firms are not

3] MCL   is   controlled   by   the   Bidvest   Group   Limited   (‘Bidvest   Group’). 2  Bidvest  
Group   is   listed   on   the   JSE   Securities   Exchange   and   no   single   shareholder  
controls it.
4] The   primary   target   firm   is   Inyanga   Motors   (Pty)   Ltd   (‘Inyanga   Motors’),   a  
company incorporated in terms of the company laws of the Republic of South  
Africa.   Inyanga   Motors   is   controlled   by   the   following   shareholders   in   the  
indicated percentages:
[4.1] Peter Cleary 42.50%;
[4.2] Sheila Ngubane 25%;
[4.3] Inyanga Holdings 12.5%;
[4.4] Andrew Cleary 2.5%;
[4.5] Susan Cleary 2.5%; and
[4.6] Caryn Lee Overton 2.5%.
5] Inyanga Motors owns two Daimler Chrysler South Africa (‘DCSA’) franchised  
dealerships in the Zululand area. 
Description of the transaction
6] The   transaction   involves   the   acquisition   by   MCL   of   the   two   DaimlerChrysler  
franchised dealerships of Inyanga Motors, situated in Vryheid and Empangeni  
within the Zululand  region. Post  merger McCarthy MCL will  own 80% of the  
issued   shares   of   Inyanga   Motors.   The   remaining   20%  will   be   held   by   Peter  
relevant for the current transaction.
2  Schedule A to Form CC 4(1) filed by MCL details companies, associated companies and  
joint ventures controlled by Bidvest Group.
2

Cleary, the current Inyanga Motors majority shareholder and dealer principal.
Rationale for the transaction
7] The acquiring firm views this transaction as enabling it to strategically position  
itself   within   the   Empangeni   Richards   Bay   area   as   there   are   planned  
developments   in   the   surrounding   areas   which   has   potential   growth   for   its  
dealership.3
8] The   shareholders   of   the   primary   target   firm   wish   to   realise   returns   on   their  
investments.
The parties’ activities 
Primary acquiring firm 
9] MCL   is   involved   in   the   sale   of   new   and   used   passenger   and   commercial  
vehicles through more than 100 of its wholly­owned motor vehicle dealerships.  
MCL is also involved in the sale of parts and services, provision of financial  
services   and   fleet   support,   import   and   distribution   activities,   vehicle  
auctioneering, online retailing and vehicle/truck rental.
The primary target firm
10] Inyanga   Motors   has   two   franchised   DaimlerChrysler   dealerships   which   are  
involved   in   the   sale   of   new   and   used   DaimlerChrysler   passenger   and  
commercial vehicles, including associated parts and services. Inyanga Motors  
also sells used vehicles which essentially are trade­inns from Inyanga Motors’  
customers.
11] Inyanga   Plaza   is   a   property   leasing   company   which   is   a   wholly   owned  
subsidiary of Inyanga Motors. 4
Relevant markets
3  MCL was further motivated by the impressive performance of Inyanga Motors for receiving  
many accolades in various categories and being the current DaimlerChrysler SA Dealer of the  
year.(Record p41).
4 Inyanga Plaza does not form part of this transaction and as a result, it is unnecessary to  
analyse it in these reasons.
3

12] The Commission submitted that the relevant market is the market for the sale of  
passenger   vehicles   and   commercial   vehicles. 5    Such   a   definition   would   be  
consistent with the Tribunal’s approach in   DaimlerChrysler/ Sandown Motors. 6 
In that case the Tribunal stated that the market for passenger vehicles can be  
further   segmented   into   various   sub­markets   namely   small   cars,   luxury   cars,  
specialty cars, sport utility vehicles and mini vans. The Tribunal further stated  
that   commercial   vehicles   can   further   be   sub­divided   into   light   commercial  
vehicles, medium commercial vehicles, heavy commercial vehicles, and extra  
heavy commercial vehicles and buses.
13] With   regard   to   the   geographic   market   the   Commission   submitted   that   the  
relevant geographic market in this transaction is the Zululand area as it is the  
region where the parties’ activities overlap. 
14] The   Tribunal   finds   that   the   relevant   market   is   the   market   for   the   sale   of  
passenger   motor   vehicles   and   commercial   vehicles   with   the   respective   sub­
markets as stated above. The geographic market is at least the Zululand area. 7
 
Market Shares
15] The   Commission   concluded   that   on   the   basis   of   the   data   received   from  
Response Trendline Group 8 overlaps do occur in the activities of the parties in  
the   B­Medium   passenger   vehicles   and   sports   utility   vehicles   in   the   broader  
passenger vehicle market.
Table 1: Market shares in the B­Medium passenger vehicles in the Zululand area
5  The   retail   of   new   motor   vehicles   takes   place   through   motor   vehicle   dealerships.   The  
manufacturers   either   directly   own   dealerships   but   the   majority   are   independently   owned  
franchised   dealerships.   The   independently   owned   dealerships   are   either   dedicated   to   a

particular manufacturer’s products. Dealerships can thus be classified into exclusive and multi­
franchise dealerships.
6  Daimler Chrysler and Sandown Motors  Case No. 44/LM/Jul01.
7  In the  DaimlerChrysler and Sandown Motors  case and in  Unitrans/Senwes  Case No.   68/LM/
Dec01 the Tribunal found that customers are not bound to a particular area when buying cars  
and that the geographic market may be broader than the area where the parties are active and  
that there is a trend to buy from dealers within customers’ close proximity to their work and  
place or residence suggesting that the market is at least local.
8  The Response Group Trendline is an official supplier of National Automobile Association  
Manufacturers of South Africa (‘NAAMSA’) retail sales statistics, car prices and specifications.
4

Market participant Estimated market share in Zululand  
(%)
Ritchie Auto 26
Inyanga Motors 20.6
NT Motors (Vryheid) 14
Renault (Richardsbay) 10.7
Provincial Delta (Richardsbay) 10.7
McCarthy 7.4
Nissan Intercity (Empangeni) 4.1
Toyota (Vryheid) 4.1
East’s Toyota 2.8
FASA Inercity 0.8
Provincial Delta (Mtubatuba) 0.2
Others 0.6
Total 100
16] The   post   merger   market   share   in   the   market   for   the   B­medium   passenger  
vehicles market in the Zululand would be 28%.
Table 2: Market shares in the sports utility vehicles in the Zululand area
Market participant Estimated market share in Zululand  
(%)
Inyanga Motors 36
McCarthy 15.3
Land Rover (Empangeni) 12.2
East’s Toyota 8.3
Toyota (Vryheid) 8.3
Nissan Intercity (Empangeni) 5.6
Renault (Richardsbay) 5.4
NT Motors 4.8
Provincial Delta 2.6
FASA Intercity 0.6
Others 0.9
Total 100
17] The post merger market share in the market for sports utility vehicles in the  
Zululand would be 51.3%.
Table 3: Market shares in the light commercial vehicles market in the Zululand  
area
5

Market participant Estimated market share in Zululand  
(%)
Ritchie Auto 31.8
Iyanga Motors 14.7
East’s Toyota 12.6
Nissan Intercity (Empangeni) 11.2
McCarthy 11
Toyota Vryheid 8.8
FASA Intercity (Empangeni) 3.8
Provincial Delta (Mtubatuba) 2.8
Provincial Delta (Richards Bay) 2.3
Renault (Richards Bay) 0.3
Others 0.7
Total 100
18] The post merger market share in the market for light commercial vehicles in the  
Zululand area would be 25.7%.
Table   4:   Market   shares   in   the   medium   commercial   vehicles   market   in   the  
Zululand area
Market participant Estimated market share in Zululand  
(%)
Inyanga Motors 28.5
McCarthy 26.7
Richie Auto 12.5
East’s Toyota 10.7
Provincial Delta (Richards Bay) 10.7
FASA Intercity (Empangeni) 5.3
Toyota Vryheid 5.3
Others 0.3
Total 100
19] The post merger market share in the market for medium commercial vehicles in  
the Zululand would be 55.2%.
Competition analysis 
20] From the market shares above, it is clear that the market shares which might  
raise   competition   concerns   are   in   the   market   for   sports   utility   passenger  
vehicles   (with   a   post   merger   market   share   of   51.3%)   and   the   medium  
6

commercial vehicles (with a post merger market share of 55.2%). 9
21] The Commission is of the view that the post merger high market shares are  
mainly because of the quality of the brands, price variety (number of different  
branded   products   available   to   choose   from   and   after   sales   services).   In  
addition,   the   Zululand   area,   which   is   the   relevant   geographic   market   in   this  
transaction can be categorised as a peri­urban area and dealership outlets are  
widely   dispersed.   Accordingly,   large   franchised   dealerships   based   in   the  
broader   KwaZulu   Natal   market   such   as   Imperial   Holdings   Ltd,   Barloworld  
Limited,   Super   Group   Limited   and   others   neighbouring   the   Zululand   region,  
could potentially be regarded as competitors in the Zululand region due to the  
geographic overlap.
22] In   addition,   there   is   competition   from   other   dealerships   supplying   different  
brand   vehicles   such   as   Renault,   Volvo,   Toyota,   BMW,   Chevrolet,   MAN   and  
Scania. They compete with the merging firms in almost every category of new  
and used passenger vehicles market. Different dealership outlets compete for  
customers   on   the   basis   of   better   service   offerings,   price,   quality,   attractive  
maintenance contracts and related services.
23]   The parties submitted that it is difficult for a single retail dealer to effectively  
exercise market power in any of the identified segments since the competitive  
landscape is much wider. Competition between brands (as opposed to intra­
brand competition) at manufacturing level seems to filter through to the retail  
level and customer preference.
24] These   markets   are   highly   competitive,   especially   as   they   are   dependent   on  
various   factors   which   include   continuous   innovation,   customer   preference,  
affordability in terms of price and attitude towards a particular brand of vehicle.

affordability in terms of price and attitude towards a particular brand of vehicle.
9  In the market for B­Medium passenger vehicles the merged entity will have a post merger  
market share of 28% and will continue to face competition from Ritchie Auto (with a market  
share of 26%) and NT Motors (with a market share of 14%), among others. In the market for  
light commercial vehicles the merged entity will have a post merger market share of 25.7%  
and   will   continue   to   face   competition   from   firms   like   Ritchie   Auto   (with   a   market   share   of  
31.8%) and East’s Toyota (with a market share of 12.6%), among others. 
7

25] The barriers to entry are low. There are no regulatory barriers to entry but a  
new   entrant   into   the   market   would   have   to   consider   various   factors   which  
include   seeking   the   permission   of   the   municipalities   and   local   authorities   to  
develop     suitable   premises   to   operate   from;   getting   approval   from   franchise  
principal   to   operate   as   a   franchised   dealer;     significant   capital   requirements  
required to commence business as a motor vehicle retailer; high working capital  
requirements; and capital requirements in respect of custom built facilities and  
plant equipment. 
26] Accordingly the Tribunal finds that the transaction will not lead to a substantial  
lessening of competition in the relevant market
Public Interest 
27] There are no public interest issues.
Conclusion
28] The merger is approved unconditionally. 
________________ 8 May 2007
Y Carrim  DATE
Tribunal Member
N Manoim and M Mokuena concur in the judgment of Y Carrim
Tribunal Researcher:  R Kariga
For the merging parties:  S Ramluckan, Garlicke and Bousfield Attorneys  
For the Commission : L Lamola and HB Senekal (Mergers and Acquisitions)
8