Autumn Storm Investments 362 (Pty) Ltd and Outdoor Network (93/LM/Nov06) [2006] ZACT 90; [2007] 1 CPLR 141 (CT) (4 December 2006)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Autumn Storm Investments 362 (Pty) Ltd acquiring Outdoor Network (Pty) Ltd — Tribunal approval of merger based on lack of competition concerns — Autumn Storm intends to acquire 100% of Outdoor’s share capital, introducing a black economic empowerment partner — No overlap in activities between the parties, with Outdoor accounting for 12% of the outdoor advertising market — No significant competition concerns identified, and no public interest issues raised, leading to unconditional approval of the transaction.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
       
              Case No:   93/LM/Nov06
In the matter between:
Autumn Storm Investments 362 (Pty) Ltd                  Acquiring Firm
And
Outdoor Network (Pty) Ltd                                                                      Target Firm
Panel: D Lewis (Presiding Member), M Moerane (Tribunal Member) and M Mokuena  
(Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 4 December 2006
Order and Reasons issued on: 4 December 2006
Reasons for Decision
APPROVAL
1] On   4   December   2006,   the   Tribunal   approved   the   merger   between   Autumn  
Storm Investments 362 (Pty) Ltd (“Autumn Storm”) and Outdoor Network (Pty)  
Ltd (“Outdoor”). The reasons for approval follow.
THE TRANSACTION
2] Autumn  Storm  intends   acquiring   100%  of   the  entire  issued  share  capital   of  
Outdoor as well as all the claims against Outdoor.
3] The shareholders of Autumn Storm are Zungu Investments Company (Pty) Ltd  
(“Zungu”), Sanlam Limited (“Sanlam”) and the management of Outdoor. 1 The  
largest   shareholders   of   Outdoor   are   Z.Sisulu,   RMB   Corvest   Limited,   Derek  
Arthur Family Trust and F H & V Durban (Pty) Ltd. 2
1  See page 25 of the Commission’s record for the detailed structure of Zungu.
2  See page 380­1 of the Commission’s record.
1

4] The transaction introduces a black economic empowerment partner to Outdoor  
and is in line with Zungu’s  ambitions for participating  in the media industry.  
According   to   the   parties,   the   silent   shareholders   in   Outdoor   have   indicated  
their intentions to exit the company. 3
THE PARTIES’ ACTIVITIES
5] Outdoor   provides   outdoor   advertising   on   billboards,   street   furniture,   in­store  
point of sales, trailers and promotional items. Autumn Storm is a new company  
and   has   not   commenced   trading.   Sanlam   is   involved   in   life   insurance,  
investment,   short­term   insurance   and   independent   financial   services.  
According to the parties, none of the companies which Sanlam has an interest  
in, provides similar products and/or services as those provided by Outdoor. 
6] Zungu is an investment holding company with interests in the following areas:  
forensics,   healthcare,   financial   services,   resources,   mining   exploration,  
recruitment,   security   services,   contract   cleaning   and   cash   management.  
Sarhwu Investment Holdings Ltd, a subsidiary of Zungu, has a 10% interest in  
Screen World (Pty) Ltd, a company providing similar products and/or services  
in Gauteng.   4
7] According   to  the   parties,   Zungu   also   intends   acquiring   a   one   third  stake   in  
Izimpondo   Communications   (Pty)   Ltd,   which   is   involved   in   publishing,  
communication services, public relations and investment in media companies.  
Izimpondo’s main business is the production of a newspaper title “Umafrika.”  5
IMPACT ON COMPETITION
8] There   appears   to   be   no  overlap   in   the  activities   of   the   parties.   The   parties  
nevertheless   submit   that   Outdoor  accounts   for  12%   of   the   national   outdoor  
3  Page 61 of the Commission’s Record.
4  Page 63 of the Commission’s record.
5  Page 63­4 of the Commission’s record.
2

advertising market. 
9] Although   the   challenge   of   obtaining   municipal   approval   in   a   specific   area  
seems to be a critical barrier to entry in the outdoor advertising market, we are  
nevertheless   satisfied   that   the   transaction   does   not   raise   any   significant  
competition concerns, given the fact that there is no history of collusion in the  
industry and customers exert significant countervailing power.
CONCLUSION
10] There are no public interest concerns 6 and we accordingly approve the  
transaction without conditions.
____________________
D Lewis
M Moerane and M Mokuena concurring.
Tribunal Researcher:  M Murugan­Modise
For the merging parties: T Molokomme and N Browne (Cliffe Dekker)
For the Commission: S Maphumulo and H Ratshisusu (Mergers and Acquisitions)
6  During the hearing, the parties stated that they had no intention of retrenching any employees.
3