Lexshell 44 General Trading (Pty) and V&A Waterfront Holdings (Pty) Ltd (86/LM/Oct06) [2006] ZACT 89 (4 December 2006)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Unconditional approval of merger between Lexshell 44 General Trading (Pty) Ltd and V&A Waterfront Holdings (Pty) Ltd — Lexshell, a shelf company with no current operations in South Africa, intends to acquire 100% of V&A Holdings, which is controlled by various Transnet-related entities — No horizontal or geographic overlap between the merging parties' activities — Commission's investigation concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition — No public interest issues identified — Merger approved unconditionally.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 86/LM/Oct06
In the matter between:
Lexshell 44 General Trading (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firm
And
V&A Waterfront Holdings (Pty) Ltd Target Firm
______________________________________________________________
Panel :  D.H Lewis (Tribunal Member) M.T.K Moerane (Tribunal  
    Member), and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member) 
Heard on : 04 December 2006
Decided on : 04 December 2006
Reasons Issued: 04 December 2006
REASONS FOR DECISION
Approval
[1] On the 04 th of November 2006, the Tribunal unconditionally approved  
the proposed merger between the abovementioned parties.  The reasons for  
the decision follow.
Parties
[2] The acquiring firm is Lexshell 44 General Trading (Pty) Ltd (“Lexshell”)  
a company incorporated under the laws of South Africa. Lexshell is a shelf  
company and controls no firm. The following firms have direct control over  
Lexshell: London & Regional Group Holding Ltd (“London & Regional”) 1 which  
holds 50.1% shares in Lexshell and Istithmar PJSC (“Istithmar”) 2 which holds  
24.8%   shares   of   Lexshell 3.   Lexshell   is   a   company   formed   by   London   &  
Regional   Holdings   (“L&R”),   which   is   involved   in   traditional   prime   and  
1  London & Regional is a private company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales having  
its principal place of business in London. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Loopsign Ltd a company  
incorporated   under   the   laws   of   England   and   Wales   and   having   its   principal   place   of   business   in  
London.
2  Istithmar  is a company incorporated  under the laws of the United Arab  Emirates  and having its  
principal place of business in Dubai.
3  Members of historically disadvantaged group own the other 25.01% shares in Lexshell. See page 47  
of the record.
1

secondary   office   and   retail   commercial   investment,   sale   and   lease­back  
portfolio,   hotels   and   healthcare,   Istithmar   Private   Joint   Stock   Company  
(“Istithmar”) which is involved in shipyard and yatch repair services, property  
and real estate development, and private equity and BEE investors.  
[3] The   primary   target   firm   is   V&A   Waterfront   Holdings   (Pty)   Ltd   (“V&A  
Holdings”)4. V&A Holdings is jointly controlled by Transnet Second Defined  
Pension   Fund   (“TSDPF”),   Transnet   Ltd   (“Transnet”),   Transnet   Retirement  
Fund (“TRF”) and Transnet Pension Fund 5.   TSDPF holds 43.6%, Transnet  
holds 26%, TRF holds 22.6% and TPF holds 7.8% issued linked units in the  
V&A Holdings. 
Transaction
[4] In terms of the deed of sale entered into between Lexshell and  
Transnet, Lexshell intends to acquire 100% of the issued linked units in V&A  
Holdings.
 
Rationale of the Transaction
[5] From   the   acquiring   group’s   perspective   the   transaction   will   allow  
Istithmar and London & Regional (both of whom are foreign investors) to enter  
the South African market on commercially acceptable terms and conditions.  
From the target group’s perspective the sale enables Transnet to focus on its  
core ports, freight rail and pipeline businesses in South Africa.
 
Parties’ Activities
[6] Lexshell   is   a   newly   formed   company   controlled   by   a   consortium   of  
international   property   and   BEE   investors.   Lexshell   and   its   shareholders  
currently provide no products or services in South Africa.  London & Regional  
is   one   of   Europe’s   largets,   privately   owned,   property   investment   and  
development companies with investments in eighteen European countries. It  
has interest in traditional prime and secondary office and retail commercial  
investment, sale and lease­back portfolio, hotel and healthcare. V&A Holdings  
is an investment holding company and does not sell any products nor provide

is an investment holding company and does not sell any products nor provide  
any   services.   The   firms 6  controlled   by   V&A   Holdings   render   services   in  
property   management   and   development   sector,   and   also   has   property  
investment in retail, office, industrial, residential property. 7  
4  V&A   Holdings   wholly   owned   subsidiaries   are:   V&A   Properties   (Pty)   Ltd   (“V&A   Properties”);  
Victoria & Alfred Waterfront (Pty) Ltd (“ V&A Manco”); V&A Waterfront Marina (Pty) Ltd (“V&A  
Marina”) and Ebelink (Pty) Ltd (“Ebelink”). V&A Holdings also holds 70% of the beneficial interest in  
Two Oceans Aquarium Trust (“ The Trust”) which controls the Two Oceans Aquarium (“Two Oceans  
Aquarium”)
5  TSDPF, TPF, TRF  are   independent   pension  and  retirement  funds  and  are   not  controlled  by  any  
specific entity.
6  See footnote 4
7  For the various activities in which firms controlled by V&A Holdings are involved in see pages 84 to  
2

The Relevant Market
[7] The parties submitted in their filing that there is no horizontal overlap  
between the business activities of the acquiring group and those of the target  
group. According to the parties the acquiring group is also not active in any  
product market upstream or downstream to those product markets in which  
the target group is active in South Africa. 8  The Commission’s investigation  
found   that   although   there   is   a   product   overlap   between   the   activities   of  
merging parties in retail, office property and property development, there is no  
geographic   overlap   between   the   activities   of   the   merging   parties.   We  
therefore agree with both the merging parties and the Commission view that  
the   proposed   transaction   is   unlikely   to   substantially   prevent   or   lessen  
competition. 
Public Interest Issues
[8] There are no public interest issues .
Conclusion
[9]. Based on the above the transaction will not result in a substantial  
lessening or prevention of competition in the identified markets and is  
accordingly approved unconditionally.
___________________ 04 December 2006
D. H Lewis  Date
Tribunal Member
M Mokuena and M.T.K Moerane concurring.
Tribunal Researcher :  J Ngobeni
104 of the record.
8  The target group provides retail, office property development in the Western Cape Province, whereas  
the acquiring group is active in more than 18 countries excluding South Africa.
3

For the merging parties : Pieter Steyn (Werksmans); Dave Thompson
(Cliffe Dekker) and Andries Le Grange
(Hofmeyr)
For the Commission : Mulalo Ratshisusu
  Mergers and Acquisitions
4