Sasol Chemical Industries Ltd and Sasol Dyno Nobel (Pty) Ltd (62/LM/Jul06) [2006] ZACT 79 (3 October 2006)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Sasol Chemical Industries Ltd proposed to acquire the remaining 40% shareholding in Sasol Dyno Nobel (Pty) Ltd, increasing its ownership from 60% to 100%. The transaction arose from Dyno Nobel's shareholder selling its stake to Macquarie Bank, which intended to on-sell to Orica Limited, potentially jeopardizing Sasol Dyno Nobel's access to critical technology. The Tribunal assessed the impact on competition and found no overlap in products or services between Sasol Chemical and Sasol Dyno Nobel. The merger was deemed unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets. Holding: The Tribunal approved the merger without conditions, finding no public interest concerns.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
       
Case No: 62/LM/Jul06
In the matter between:
Sasol Chemical Industries Ltd         Acquiring Firm
And
Sasol Dyno Nobel (Pty) Ltd              Target Firm
Panel:   D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal Member) and Y 
Carrim (Tribunal Member)
Date of Hearing:  30 August 2006 
Order issued on:  30 August 2006 
Reasons issued on: 03 October 2006  
Reasons
APPROVAL
1] On   30   August   2006,   the   Tribunal   approved   the   merger   between   Sasol  
Chemical Industries Ltd (“Sasol Chemical”) and Sasol Dyno Nobel (Pty) Ltd  
(“Sasol Dyno Nobel”). The reasons for approval follow.
THE TRANSACTION
2] Sasol Chemical intends increasing its shareholding in Sasol Dyno Nobel from  
60% to 100% of the entire issued share capital thereof, by purchasing Dyno  
Nobel   Holding   ASA’s   40%   stake   in   Sasol   Dyno   Nobel. 1  Sasol   Chemical   is  
controlled by Sasol Limited. 2
3] According   to   the   parties,   in   December   2005   Dyno   Nobel’s   shareholder  
announced that it had sold its entire shareholding in Dyno Nobel to Macquarie  
Bank, who in turn announced their intention to on­sell   inter alia   their African  
1  Sasol Dyno Nobel is a joint venture between the two shareholders
2  Sasol is listed on the JSE and According to the parties, no single firm or individual controls it. Sasol  
has a number of subsidiaries which are depicted in an organogram on page 50­51 of the Commission’s  
record.

interests to Orica Limited, an Australian company. In terms of the Sasol Dyno  
Nobel shareholders’ agreement, Sasol Nitro, a division of Sasol Chemical, has  
a pre­emptive right to purchase Dyno Nobel’s 40%. 
4] According   to   the   parties,   Sasol   Limited   was   of   the   view   that   should   it   not  
exercise the right, Orica would become the owner of the 40% shareholding in  
Sasol Dyno Nobel. As a result the new Dyno Nobel North America technology  
(which Sasol Dyno Nobel has a non exclusive right to use on an evergreen  
basis) would not be available in South Africa. According to Sasol, this would  
become   an   untenable   situation   as   Sasol   Dyno   Nobel   is   based   on   this  
technology, which directly competes with Orica technology worldwide. 
IMPACT ON COMPETITION
5] Sasol   Dyno   Nobel   is   involved   in   the   sale   of   non­electric   initiation   systems,  
which   includes:   shock­tube   detonators,   detonating   cords   and   pentolite  
boosters   (manufactured   in   Mpumalanga)   and   safety   fuse   and   igniters   cord  
(imported from China). Save for the products sold and services rendered by  
Sasol   Dyno   Nobel   (in   respect   of   which   Sasol   Chemical   has   a   60%  
shareholding), neither Sasol Chemical nor Sasol Limited (and its subsidiaries)  
offer any product or service which overlaps with those offered by Sasol Dyno  
Nobel.  The merger therefore does not result in any change in market structure  
or accretion in market share. 
CONCLUSION
6] In   light   of   the   above,   we   are   of   the   view   that   the   transaction   is   unlikely   to  
substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the markets, in which the  
parties are active. There are no public interest concerns and we accordingly  
approve the transaction without conditions.
____________________

D Lewis
Presiding member
Y Carrim and N Manoim concurring
Tribunal Researcher:  M Murugan­Modise
For the merging parties: M Garden (Edward Nathan)
For the Commission : L Lamola and M Mohlala (Mergers & Acquisitions)