Medi-Clinic Investment (Pty) Ltd and Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre (Pty) Ltd (75/LM/Aug05) [2005] ZACT 76 (2 November 2005)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger approval — Medi­Clinic Investment (Pty) Ltd acquiring 49.9% of Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre (Pty) Ltd — Transaction assessed for impact on competition and public interest — Medi­Clinic, a major player in the private hospital market, will increase its market share but will not substantially lessen competition — Tribunal finds that WUDGMC's low market share does not constitute an effective competitive threat — Approval granted with consideration of potential employee retrenchments mitigated by new positions created.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
  Case no.: 75/LM/Aug05  
In the large merger between: 
Medi­Clinic Investment (Pty) Ltd 
and 
Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre (Pty) Ltd  
________________________________________________________________
Reasons
________________________________________________________________
Introduction
The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between Medi­Clinic Investment  
(Pty) Ltd and Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre (Pty) Ltd on 12  
October 2005. The reasons are set out below.                   
The transaction
Medi­Clinic Investment (Pty) Ltd  (“Medi­Clinic”) will acquire 49.9% of the issued  
share capital of Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre (Pty) Ltd  
(“WUDGMC”).   Medi ­linic is a wholly owned subsidiary of Medi­Clinic  
Corporation Ltd. It owns and manages a range of private hospitals throughout  
South Africa.  WUDGMC is controlled by the University of the Witwatersrand  
(”Wits”) and owns one private hospital in Parktown, Johannesburg. It also  
controls Kenridge Dispensary (Pty) Ltd.  
Medi­Clinic will conclude a shareholders’ agreement with Wits University, the  
remaining shareholder with 50.1%, in terms of which it will obtain minority

protection rights. Medi­Clinic will also manage the hospital in terms of a  
management agreement. 
Rationale for the transaction
Apart from expanding its presence in Johannesburg, Medi­Clinic’s hospitals and  
doctors will be kept abreast of evidence­based medicine as well as securing the  
training of and exposure to specialists. Medi­Clinic will also benefit from its  
association with the Wits University brand and the merger will increase the  
possibility of accreditation of certain units at its other hospitals in Johannesburg  
as teaching units affiliated to Wits.  
WUDGMC will acquire additional capital to, inter alia, purchase new equipment  
and Medi ­linic’s procurement power will reduce WDGM’s costs and overheads.
Effect on competition
Both the merging parties are active in the product market for the provision of  
private hospital services.    
Medi­Clinic is one of only three major private hospital groups in South Africa and  
and owns 6209 beds nationally of which 1515 are in Gauteng. WUDGMC owns  
one private hospital with 190 beds in Parktown, Johannesburg. 
The Competition Commission considered the effect of the transaction within a  
local as well as a national geographic market. Within a local market the merged  
entity’s market share will increase from 10.9% to 14% with its largest competitor  
being   Netcare   with   55.8%   and   the   second   largest   being   Life   Healthcare   with  
30%. In a national market the merged entity will have a market share of 30.4%  
with  the  largest   player  being  Netcare   with  36.6%  and   the   second  largest   Life  
Healthcare with 32.9%.
WUDGMC   is   a   relatively   small   player   in   the   private   hospital   market,   which   is  
dominated  by   three  large  competitors.   Its   market   share   in  the   local   market   is  
3.1%   and   in   the   national   market   0.9%.   We   agree   with   the   Commission   that,  
based on its low market share, WUDGMC could not be regarded as an effective  
competitor exiting the market.

competitor exiting the market.
The Tribunal accordingly finds that the transaction will not substantially prevent  
or lessen competition in the private hospital market whether the market is defined  
2

as local or national. 
Public interest
According to the merging parties a maximum of 25 of the 306 employees, i.e.  
senior management and administrative staff, of WUDGMC might, in a worst­case  
scenario,   be   retrenched.   However   the   parties   informed   the   Commission   that  
these   staff   members   would   be   considered   and   accommodated   for   23   new  
positions that will be created as a result of the transaction. 
____________ 2 November 2005
Y Carrim Date
Concurring: D Lewis, N Manoim,
3