Unitrans Motors (Pty) Ltd and Weiss Motors (Pty) Ltd (77/LM/Aug05) [2005] ZACT 71 (31 October 2005)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Unitrans Motors (Pty) Ltd and Weiss Motors (Pty) Ltd — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between Unitrans Motors and Weiss Motors, allowing Unitrans to acquire sole ownership of Weiss's dealerships in Durban and Amanzimtoti. The parties argued that the merger would achieve economies of scale amidst over-trading in the greater Durban area. The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially lessen or prevent competition in any relevant market, as the combined market shares post-merger would remain minimal and there were sufficient competing dealerships in the region. The merger was approved unconditionally, with no public interest concerns raised.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
     Case No: 77/LM/Aug05
In the large merger between: 
Unitrans Motors (Pty) Ltd 
and
Weiss Motors (Pty) Ltd
Reasons for Decision
________________________________________________________________
APPROVAL
On   21   October   2005   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance  
Certificate   approving  the   merger  between  Unitrans  Motors   (Pty)  Ltd  and  Weiss  
Motors (Pty) Ltd in terms of section 16(2)(a). The reasons for the approval of the  
merger appear below.
The Parties
1. The acquiring firm is Unitrans Motors (Pty) Ltd (“Unitrans”). It is controlled  
by Unitrans Motor Enterprises (Pty) Ltd, which is a wholly­owned subsidiary  
of Unitrans Limited. Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd, a 100% subsidiary  
of the listed entity, Steinhoff International Holdings Ltd, has a 60% stake in  
Unitrans   Limited.   Unitrans   operates   a   motor   dealership   in   Kings   Park,  
Durban.
2. The primary target firm  is  Weiss  Motors  (Pty) Ltd  (“Weiss”).  It  owns two  
motor dealerships in Durban and Amanzimtoti. Weiss’ sole shareholder is  
Mr A Hartley.
The Merger Transaction

3. Unitrans is  acquiring sole ownership of the Weiss dealerships in Durban  
and Amanzimtoti. This transaction involves the sale of the dealerships as  
going concerns.
Rationale for the Transaction 
4. Unitrans wants to consolidate its existing dealership with Weiss’ operations.  
Weiss’ owner is emigrating and selling his dealership business. 
5. The parties contend that the greater Durban area is becoming over­traded ,  
with the result that it is becoming difficult for motor dealerships to remain  
viable on the numbers of vehicles they are servicing.  They allege that their  
daily dealership costs, as well as workshop and “tooling up” costs, are very  
high and add to their burdens. While the parties are not contending that the  
target   firm   is   a   failing   firm,   they   state   that   economies   of   scale   and   cost  
savings will be achieved by the combination of dealerships. 1 
The relevant product and geographic markets
f. Both parties are involved  in various  aspects  of motor  vehicle  
retailing.   Unitrans   sells   new   and   pre­owned   motor   vehicles,  
parts and accessories and provides after­sales services as well  
as associated services such as transport, logistics, distribution  
and warehousing. Weiss Motors also sells new and pre­owned  
vehicles,   parts   and   accessories   and   provides   after­sales  
service. The Commission identified   the  overlap between  them  
as extending to the sale of new Volkswagen motor vehicles as  
well as various brands of pre­owned motor vehicles.
7. Based on this overlap, the identified relevant markets are firstly, the sale of  
Volkswagen's   new   small,   medium   and   luxury   cars   and   light   commercial  
vehicles,   and   secondly,   the   sale   of   pre­owned   passenger   vehicles   of   all  
brands. 
8. We have previously defined the passenger vehicle market as comprising  
different segments or sub­markets. 2  The Commission did not analyse the

different segments or sub­markets. 2  The Commission did not analyse the  
1  We note that an assertion of over­trading, when made by a participant in the market, could merely signify  
healthy competition.
2  We have held that the passenger vehicle sub­markets may include entry level cars; small cars; lower middle  
cars;   upper   middle   cars;   large   cars;   lower   luxury   cars;   upper   luxury   cars;   lower   specialty   cars;   upper  
speciality cars; small utility; lower middle utility; upper middle utility; small minivans; and minivans. The  
market for commercial vehicles can be sub­divided into: light; medium and heavy commercial vehicles; as  
well as buses and coaches over ten tons. See  DaimlerChrysler South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Sandown Motor  
Holdings (Pty) Ltd  ­ 44/LM/Jul01,  Combined Motor Holdings Limited and Forza (Pty) Ltd  – 64/LM/Jul05

market   for   parts   and   servicing,   and   we   find   it   unnecessary   to   consider  
whether   this  is   a  separate  relevant   market.   As  we  mention  below,   there  
seem to be other Volkswagen dealers in Durban and nearby areas from  
which Volkswagen parts are readily accessible.
9. For present purposes we accept that the second relevant market, that for  
the sale of pre­owned vehicles, includes after­sales servicing. 
10. t is not disputed that in the   market for the sale of pre­owned passenger  
vehicles, competition is lively. A market share quantification for that market  
has not been provided and we are satisfied that it would not have been  
necessary for the purposes of the Tribunal's adjudication of this merger.
11. We have previously held that the market for pre­owned motor vehicles is  
characterised by low entry barriers, as evidenced by the many sources of  
supply of pre­owned vehicles. 3 We do not need to analyse this market any  
further.
12. As far as the first market is concerned, the Commission has applied the  
approach which we have adopted in previous cases and has identified the  
combined market shares of the merging parties (based on new Volkswagen  
sales)   in   the   overlapping   sub­markets   or   segments   of   both   the   broader  
geographic market, namely the greater Durban area, and also   and more  
narrowly,  Durban itself:
Table 1: Market Shares in Durban (new Volkswagen vehicles)
Firm Small  Medium  Luxury Light 
Commercial 
Unitrans 4.6% 2.8% 0.2% 0.1%
Weiss 4.3% 2.4% 0.5% 0.06%
Combined   post­
merger
8.9% 5.2% 0.7% 0.16%
Source: Merging parties’ data derived from Naamsa Figures
Table 2: Market Shares in Greater­Durban 4 (new Volkswagen vehicles)
Firm Small  Medium  Luxury Light 
Commercial 
Unitrans 3.4% 2.0% 0.2% 0.08%
Weiss 4.7% 2.4% 0.4% 0.1%
Combined   post­
merger
8.1% 4.4% 0.6% 0.18%
3  See  DaimlerChrysler South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Sandown Motor Holdings (Pty) Ltd  ­ 44/LM/Jul01

4  According to Naamsa data, greater Durban entails Durban, Durban City Council, Ndwedwe, Pinetown,  
Pinetown City Council, Umhlanga, Umlazi/Amanzimtoi, Verulam/Tongaat, Westville. Record page 388

Source: Merging parties’ data derived from Naamsa Figures
13. It  is clear  that in each  sub­market,  the  merger will  bring  about  
minimal market share accretion. 
14. Furthermore,  the   parties  listed   at  least   five  rival  Volkswagen   dealerships  
competing in both Durban and the greater Durban region.
Conclusion
We conclude that there is no effect on competition. The merger will not lead to a  
substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market.  
No vertical issues arise which call for discussion, and similarly there are no public  
interest concerns. The merging parties have given an assurance that the merger  
will not affect employment.
The Tribunal therefore approves the transaction unconditionally.
__________
31 October 2005
L. Reyburn    Date
Concurring: M. Mokoena,  T. Orleyn
For the merging parties:   N. Browne, Cliffe Dekker Attorneys
For the Commission:  O. Strydom, Mergers and Acquisitions