COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: 25/LM/Mar05; 26/LM/Apr05; and 28/LM/Apr05
In The Large Merger Between:
Massmart Holdings Limited Acquiring
Firm
And
Thabile Trade 22 (Pty) Limited
Nabuild (Pty) Limited
Servistar (Pty) Limited Target Firms
Reasons for Decision
APPROVAL
1. On 08 June 2005 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate
unconditionally approving the merger between Massmart Holdings Limited (“Massmart”)
and Thabile Trade 22 (Pty) Ltd (“Thabile”), Nabuild (Pty) Ltd (“Nabuild”) and Servistar
(Pty) Ltd (“Servistar”). 1
THE TRANSACTION
2. The parties to this merger are Massmart Holdings Limited (“Massmart”) and Thabile
Trade 22 (Pty) Ltd (“Thabile”), Nabuild (Pty) Ltd (“Nabuild”) and Servistar (Pty) Ltd
(“Servistar”). Massmart, a publicly listed company on the JSE Securities Exchange,
owns a number of subsidiaries in South Africa and one in Mauritius. Thabile 2 is a South
African private company solely controlled by one of its shareholders, the Carlos Gomes
Trust (the “Gomes Trust”) which holds 87% of the issued shares in Thabile. 3 Nabuild is
1 Massmart, the acquiring firm, entered into three separate and divisible transactions with Thabile,
Nabuild and Servistar (“the target firms”). The merging parties notified these transactions separately
to the Competition Commission (“Commission”). The Commission after having considered that the
target firms compete in the same relevant product markets made its recommendation to the Tribunal
in a single consolidated report. We adopt the same approach as that of the Commission in this single
consolidated judgment. Save for consolidating these transactions in a single judgment, we, however,
analysed the competitive impact of these transactions separately and independently of each other.
2 Thabile controls three firms, viz., one active firm: De La Rey 1001 Building Materials (Pty) Ltd; and
two dormant firms: De La Rey Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd and De La Rey West Coast (Pty) Ltd.
3 Thabile’s other shareholder is the RJ Best Family Trust (the “Best Trust”) which holds the remaining
13% of the issued share capital in Thabile.
1
a South African private company. The transferred firm is the business conducted by
Nabuild as Federated Timbers and Feds DIY, which operate 34 retail outlets
countrywide. Servistar is a South African private company, which conducts its business
through 14 retail stores. The Ferndale Trust and John Lancelot respectively hold 24.4%
and 75.6% of the entire issued share capital in Servistar.
3. In terms of the Thabile transaction, Thabile and its respective shareholders together with
Massmart entered into a shareholders agreement in terms of which Massmart acquired
51% of the entire issued share capital held by the Gomes Trust and the Best Trust in
Thabile.4 Posttransaction, Massmart would own 51% of the issued share capital in
Thabile whilst the aforesaid two trusts would hold 42.47% and 6.53% in Thabile
respectively.
4. The Nabuild transaction entailed the acquisition by Massmart of the business of the
supply of building material conducted by Nabuild at its head office and through its 34
retail outlets.
5. In the Servistar transaction, Massmart acquired 24.4% and 75.6% of the entire issued
share capital held by the Ferndale Trust and John Lancelot Keil in Servistar
respectively.5
RATIONALE FOR THE TRANSACTION
6. On the acquiring firm’s side the stated commercial rationale for the proposed
transactions remains the same throughout the three transactions as Massmart asserted
that the present deals would enable it to expand its business of building supplies,
hardware and related products throughout the country. These appeared to be the case
as all three target firms operate in different regions countrywide.
7. The reasons for the target firms were quite different particularly because they are
independent of each other and did not form part of the same stable. Thabile needed
independent of each other and did not form part of the same stable. Thabile needed
additional capital resources and expertise in order to achieve its growth plan. Nabuild
believed that the deal would better secure the future of the Federated Timbers and Feds
DIY businesses, both from an employee perspective and in improving the businesses’
performance. Nabuild further recognised the need for additional resources and
expertise to grow the business of Federated Timbers. 6 Servistar recognised the need
for its DIY concept stores to be developed further under the umbrella of Massmart,
which, in turn, will provide Servistar with a number of synergistic benefits including inter
alia increased working capital to fund a new store expansion program. 7
4 The Gomes Trust and the Best Trust would sell 51% of the shareholder claims on loan account held
by themselves against Thabile to Massmart.
5 Page 49 of the record.
6 Pages 5455 of the Nabuild merger filing.
7 See page 50 of the Servistar merger filing.
2
The relevant market
Product market
8. Massmart is a high volume retailer of food, liquor and general merchandise (sold for
cash in Southern Africa). General merchandise encompasses a large variety of
products including office supplies, DIY equipment, hitech products, household
appliances and categories of clothing.
9. The Massmart group consists of three operating divisions, viz., Massdiscounters ,
Masswarehouse and Masscash. Massdiscounters comprises a chain of retail discount
stores trading under the two retail brand names, namely, Game and Dion. These retail
stores offer a wide range of general merchandise and nonperishable groceries to the
valueseeking endconsumer.
10. The Masswarehouse division comprises the following businesses:
Makro – a chain of large wholesale outlets that markets a range of food, liquor and
general merchandise to commercially affiliated retailers and upperincome end
consumers;
Builders Warehouse – a chain of warehouse outlets selling building supplies,
hardware and related products; and
Tile Warehouse – a chain of warehouse outlets selling ceramic and other tiles and
related products. Both Builders Warehouse and Tile Warehouse operate through
various stores located in various geographic regions within the Gauteng, one in the
North West and one in Limpopo provinces.
11. Masscash comprises wholesale (“cash & carry”) outlets (serving independent traders
who target lower income consumers) and voluntary buying associations (serving
independently owned food wholesale and retail outlets aimed primarily at lower income
consumers under the Shield trading name and independent furniture, appliance and
home electronic outlets under the Furnex trading name. Other business entities forming
part of the Massmart group are Jumbo Cash & Carry (Pty) Ltd (“Jumbo”); Browns and
part of the Massmart group are Jumbo Cash & Carry (Pty) Ltd (“Jumbo”); Browns and
Weirs Cash & Carry (“Browns and Weirs”); and CCW Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd (“CCW”).
Jumbo is a wholesale distributor of cosmetics, toiletries, and hair care products for the
lower to middle income urban consumers. Browns and Heirs and CCW are wholesale
distributors of basic grocery products and a limited range of general merchandise. 8
12. Thabile conducts three retail outlets best known as De La Rey which are all operative in
the Western Cape, i.e., in Parrow, Table View and Brackenfell. De La Rey is primarily
involved in the business of selling building supplies, hardware and related products.
13. Nabuild is involved in the business of the supply of building material, and conducts at its
head office and through 34 outlets under the names “Federated Timbers” and “Feds
8 For more detail on the Massmart group’s activities, refer to pages 2224 of the record.
3
DIY” throughout all nine provinces in South Africa. 9
14. Servistar sells a range of building supplies, hardware and related products for use in DIY
/ home and garden improvement projects through its 14 stores situated along the coastal
region of South Africa: 8 in the Eastern Cape, 4 in Kwa ZuluNatal and 2 in the Western
Cape.10
15. It is evident from the above that an overlap exits in the merging parties’ products. Both
the target firms and Builders Warehouse, a division of the Masswarehouse division of
the Massmart, conduct business as retailers of building supplies, hardware and related
products. Thabile also compete to a certain extent with certain products offered by other
Massmart stores such as Dion, Game and Makro.
16. In its investigation, the Commission found that there have not been significant changes
in the market to warrant a different product market definition to the one postulated by the
Commission and endorsed by the Tribunal in its previous decisions. 11 In the instant
case, the Commission remained of the view that the markets in which the merging
parties compete are particular product categories which consist of a wide range of
products – these being hardware, building supplies and related products with different
products that form part of these markets. 12 We have no difficulty with the Commission’s
observation in this regard.
Geographic market
17. According to the merging parties, Massmart ordinarily operates through national chains
which adopt a national pricing policy. They further pointed out that Builders Warehouse
and Tile Warehouse constitute the majority of Massmart’s business operations in the
Gauteng, Limpopo and North West provinces. From the evidence before us, it appeared
that Massmart’s presence in the relevant product market nationally is through Game and
Makro.
18. The target firms’ businesses are generally limited to certain geographic regions. As
stated above, the business operations of Thabile are limited to the Western Cape only.
Nabuild through Federated Timbers has stores throughout the country, but has a strong
presence in Kwa ZuluNatal and the Western Cape. Servistar operates in the country’s
coastal region in the Eastern and Western Cape and Kwa ZuluNatal. According to the
9 See page 9 of the Commission’s Report setting out the respective Nabuild stores located in each
and every province in the country. See further, pages 5354 of the Nabuild merger filing.
10 The acquiring firm and the three target firms classified all the ranges of building supplies,
hardware and related products into the following categories: motor accessories, electrical and
lighting, DIY (handtools and ladders), household (sanitary, home d écor and housewares), paint, allied
products and accessories, powertools, swimming pool accessories and chemicals, yard (generally
used to refer to bulk building supplies such as timber, joinery, board products, cement and lime, door
and window frames, floor accessories and ceramic tiles) and garden and patio.
11 See Masstores (Pty) Ltd and Massana Ltd & another Case No.: 93/LM/Dec02, and Masstores
(Pty) Ltd and Hentiq 2869 (Pty) Ltd & another Case No.: 53/LM/Jul04.
12 See the table set out on page 12 of the Commission’s recommendations. See further, footnote 10
supra.
4
Commission the Massmart brand that competes directly with stores owned by Thabile is
Builders Warehouse, which has stores only in Gauteng.
19. After having considered the fact that the merging parties generally trade in particular
regions, the Commission contended that the market should be analysed from a regional
perspective. The Commission nevertheless contended further that because the
Massmart chain of stores follow a national pricing policy it is therefore possible that the
market may be wider, that is, national. 13 On the same basis, the merging parties
contended that there seems to be no reason from their side to deviate from a geographic
analysis on both a national and a regional perspective. 14
Impact on competition
20. As already pointed out above, the three independent transactions would result in
Massmart acquiring three firms separate and independent of each other – all
competing in the socalled broader housewares market. We based our conclusion on
the fact that the three target companies appeared in all likelihood to sell the range of
products substantially similar to that of Builders Warehouse, which falls under the
Massmart umbrella. Furthermore, the transactions afforded Massmart a greater
opportunity to gain a national footprint as it can be seen that the three target companies
and Builders Warehouse operate in different regions of the country.
21. We found based on all the evidence before us that the merger would not result in the
substantial lessening or prevention of competition irrespective of whether the market is
defined on a broader or a narrower basis. The merging parties provided us with market
share data on the products they currently provide and/or sell. 15 However, we observed
the following from the aforesaid market share data. Firstly, the merged entity appeared
the following from the aforesaid market share data. Firstly, the merged entity appeared
to enjoy a small market share in certain products. Secondly, the merged entity seemed
to possess very high market shares in products such as garden and patio, paint and
household. We were nevertheless persuaded that those high market shares might not
necessarily influence or lead the merged entity to engage in conduct condemned by the
Competition Act. For reasons already stated, it appears unlikely that the merged entity
might behave to the detriment of consumers and to competition itself. We found that
there were numerous other retail players such as Cash Build, Build It, Timbercity and
Mica franchise chain of stores who were retailing in the same range of products as the
merging parties. With respect to the Thabile transaction, apart from the merged entity,
there are at least six other competing firms such as Penny Pinchers, Campbell
Hardware, Brights, Maitland Timbers, Airton Timbers, Pryde Trust in the Western Cape.
Some of the various small independent and specialised firms trade either as hardware
stores or as specialist paint outlets or electrical suppliers. Generally larger retail stores
such as Trade Centre, Pick ‘n Pay and Hyperama as well as the existing agricultural
firms (the previous cooperatives) also compete with the merged entity.
13 Page 13 of the Commission’s Report.
14 See the record, pages 56, 63 and 58 of the Thabile, Nabuild and Servistar merger filings
respectively.
15 See pages 1318 of the Commission’s Report.
5
Public Interest
22. According to the merging parties no job losses are anticipated pursuant to the merger. In
fact, it is Massmart’s intention in the foreseeable future to continue operating Thabile,
Nabuild and Servistar as independent businesses. 16
Conclusion
23. The Tribunal is satisfied that it is unlikely that the merger will lead to lessening or
prevention of competition in the relevant markets. There are no significant public
interest issues which would alter our conclusion.
Y Carrim 15 August 2005
Concurring: M Madlanga, M Holden
For the merging parties: Lee Mendelsohn and Mark Garden ( Edward Nathan Corporate
Law Advisers ).
For the Commission: Edwell Mtantato assisted by Maarten van Hooven ( Mergers and
Acquisitions).
16 See pages 68, 86 and 80 of the Thabile, Nabuild and Servistar merger filings respectively.
6