SA Leisure (Pty) Limited and SA Leisure (a Division of First Lifestyle (Pty) Ltd) (14/LM/Mar05) [2005] ZACT 27 (26 April 2005)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Proposed merger between SA Leisure (Pty) Limited and SA Leisure, a division of First Lifestyle (Pty) Ltd, involving a management buy-out funded by FirstRand Limited through Corvest 6 (Pty) Ltd — The merger entails Newco acquiring the assets and liabilities of the target firms with no overlaps in activities — No significant public interest concerns raised — Competition Tribunal approves the merger unconditionally based on the Commission's recommendation.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
  Case No: 14/LM/Mar05
In the large merger between: 
SA Leisure (Pty) Limited                         Acquiring Firm
and
SA Leisure ­ a Division of First Lifestyle (Pty) Ltd                           Target Firm
                                                    Reasons for Decision
Approval
1.   On   26   March   2005,   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance  
Certificate   approving   unconditionally   the   proposed   merger   between   the  
abovementioned parties. The reasons for the approval follow.
The merger transaction
2. The proposed transaction constituted a management buy­out of the target firms.  
The   buy­out   is   funded   by   FirstRand   Limited   (“FirstRand”)   through   its   subsidiary,  
Corvest 6 (Pty) Ltd (“Corvest 6”). It is envisaged that SA Leisure (Pty) Ltd (“Newco”)  
will acquire the assets and liabilities of SA Leisure, 1 Jafprop, 2 Leisure Compounders  
and IPC. 3  Newco will, post­merger, control the businesses conducted by the target  
firm.4  Corvest  6  will  hold   66%  of   the issued   share  capital  in  Newco  whereas  the  
remaining 34% will be in the hands of a consortium of management and the staff  
trust (“Consortium”). 5 
Rationale for the transaction
3. The deal is considered – by Corvest 6 – as a viable opportunity to acquire an  
equity stake in a profitable company. The management consortium wishes to buy the  
target business because it would enable them to obtain a share of the company in  
which they currently work. 6 
The merging parties
1  We were advised that Newco is acquiring the business, but not the shares of SA Leisure. 
2  This excludes the property at Norwood, which Newco will lease from Jafprop.
3  The assets and liabilities of IPC will be acquired from Jafprop.
4  Refer to page 20 (paragraph 11.6) of the record.
5  These will be held in the following proportions: Gary Cohen (10%); Miriam Jacobs (5.25%); David

Jaffit (15.4%); and Staff Trust (3.35%).  See page 494­495 of the record.
6  See the Commission’s report, page 2 (para. 3).

4. The  primary acquiring firm  is Newco, a dormant shelf company created solely for  
this acquisition. Post­merger, it will be controlled by Corvest 6 and the consortium. 
5. The  primary target firm  is SA Leisure, a division of First Lifestyle (Pty) Ltd (“First 
Lifestyle”).   Other   target   firms   are   Leisure   Compounders   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Leisure  
Compounders”), Isithebe Plastic Corporation (Pty) Ltd (“IPC”), and Jafprop (Pty) Ltd  
(“Jafprop”).7  SA Leisure controls the latter 3 business entities. Ethos Private Equity  
Fund IV holds 45% of the shares in First Lifestyle that is part of Ethos Private Equity  
Ltd,   which   in   turn   is   100%   controlled   by   Ethos   Holdings   Ltd   (“Ethos   Holdings”).  
Individuals hold the rest of the shares in First Lifestyle with no single shareholder  
holding in excess of 15% of the shares. 8 Ethos Holdings is controlled as to 50.01%  
and 49.99% by its executive management members and RMB Private Equity (Pty)  
Ltd (“RMB Private Equity”) respectively. RMB Private Equity is controlled as to 85%  
by FirstRand Bank Holdings Ltd (“FirstRand Holdings”).   
What is it that the merging parties do?
6.   Newco   is   a   newly   formed   company,   and   has   not   traded   before.   Corvest   6,   a 
subsidiary   of   FirstRand,   provides   finance   and   assistance   to   potential   investors   to  
enable them to acquire a company that they currently manage or that that which they  
have   a   substantial   stake   in. 9  FirstRand   is   the  holding   company   of   the  FirstRand  
Group of companies which comprise diverse financial services activities in the areas  
of   retail,   corporate,   investment   and   merchant   banking,   life   insurance,   employee  
benefits, health insurance and asset and property management. These services are  
provided to both local and international markets.
7.   The   target   group   is   mainly   involved   in   manufacturing,   distribution,   sales   and

marketing of plastic injection moulded products and related property holding.   They 
manufacture the following products:
 Outdoor Furniture – includes a vast array of tables and chairs;
 Housewares and storage – such as dish drainers, linen bins, laundry baskets,  
vegetable racks, food storage products and dustbins.
 Home Office – including the “buddi” branded range of plastic filing cabinets,  
drawers and desk units;
 Camping – that is, the “lifestyle” branded cooler boxes;
 Gardening – including hosepipes and spray attachments;
 Storage – such as “store it” branded storage boxes, shelving and the “kids  
stuff” branded storage products for kids;
 DIY and Fishmaster – which are: the “big Jim” branded toolboxes, organisers,  
storage bins and various “Fishmaster” branded tackle boxes. 10 
Competition Evaluation 
8.   We are  advised  that   there  are no  overlaps   with  respect  to  the  activities  of   the  
7  First Lifestyle controls these 3 other target firms.
8  See  Annexure E  “First Lifestyle Ownership as at 31 May 2003” –  Page 530 of the record.
9  This is regarded as the main objective of Corvest 6.  (Page 496 of the record)
10  See the Commission’s Report, pages 3­4.
2

acquiring firms that control Newco and that of the target firm. There are no significant  
public   interest   concerns 11  and   we   therefore   agree   with   the   Commission’s  
recommendation that the transaction be unconditionally approved.
                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                          
___________                                                                                    26 April 2005
David Lewis      Date
Concurring:  Norman Manoim and Yasmin Carrim  
For the merging parties:   Chris Charter  (Cliffe Dekker Inc)  
For the Commission:  Hardin Ratshisusu ( Mergers & Acquisitions ) 
11  The parties submitted that the merger would not have an impact on employment (retrenchment)  
whatsoever as the transaction constitutes a transfer of the target businesses and all employees to the  
acquiring firm in accordance with the provisions of section 197(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 66 of  
1995.
3