Sanlam Limited and Safrican Insurance Company and Another (03/LM/Jan05) [2005] ZACT 21 (19 April 2005)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Sanlam Limited's acquisition of Safrican Insurance Company and Newshelf 503 (Pty) Ltd — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between Sanlam Limited and Safrican Insurance Company and Newshelf 503 (Pty) Ltd, finding that the transaction would not substantially lessen competition in the relevant markets. The merger involved Sanlam Life acquiring 55% of Safrican's issued share capital and IFS subscribing for 30% of TCFS's issued share capital, aimed at expanding financial services offerings. The Tribunal concluded that the increment in market shares would be less than 1%, thus raising no competition concerns, and identified no significant public interest issues, leading to unconditional approval of the transaction.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
       Case no: 03/LM/Jan05
In The Large Merger Between: 
Sanlam Limited
And
Safrican Insurance Company and Newshelf 503 (Pty) Ltd
Reasons for Decision
Approval
On 10 March 2005 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving  
the transaction between  Sanlam Ltd and Safrican Insurance Company and Newshelf 503 (Pty) . 
The reasons for this decision follow. 
The Transaction
The   parties   to   the   transaction   are   Sanlam   Life   Insurance   Limited   (“Sanlam   Life”),   Sanlam  
Independent   Financial   Services   Limited   (“IFS”),   Thebe   Investment   Corporation   (Pty)   Ltd  
(“Thebe”), Safrican Insurance Company Limited (“Safrican”) and Newshelf 503 (Pty) Ltd (to be  
named Thebe Community Financial Services (“TCFS”). Sanlam Life and IFS are wholly owned  
subsidiaries of Sanlam Limited (“Sanlam”). Thebe 1 controls Safrican and TCFS.
The   merger  transaction   involves   the   restructuring   of   certain   of   the  financial   services   entities  
within the Thebe Group and thereby introduces Sanlam (through Sanlam Life and IFS) as a  
strategic partner. According to the parties, two indivisible transactions are contemplated. Firstly,  
Sanlam   Life   is   acquiring   55%   of   the   issued   share   capital   of   Safrican.   Secondly,   IFS   is  
subscribing for 30% of the issued share capital of TCFS. 2 
1  Thebe’s is held by Batho­Batho Trust (74%), Sanlam Life (8,67%), Investec Employee Benefits Limited  
(8,67%) and Old Mutual Life Assurance Company Limited (8,67%).
2  Through the first transaction, Sanlam Life wishes to enter the entry­level segment of the long term  
insurance   market,   and   has   identified   Thebe   as   a   strategic   partner   for   this   purpose.   For   Thebe,   the  
transaction enables it to obtain the funding and support in order to expand its current financial services  
proposition. The second leg of the transaction will give IFS minority shareholding in TCFS, which will

similarly enable TCFS to obtain the necessary funding, back­office support and the relevant skills and  
expertise from IFS.

Impact on Competition
The Sanlam Group has five operational clusters involved in life insurance (through Sanlam Life),  
short   term  insurance,   investment,   banking   and   independent   financial   services   (through   IFS).  
Sanlam   Life   is   a   registered   long­term   insurer,   which   covers   individual   products 3  and   group  
products.4  IFS is an investment holding company and has minority in a number of entities. 5 
Safrican   is   also   a   registered   long­term   insurer   offering   long   term   insurance   products   to  
individuals6  and to groups. 7  Thebe is a broad­based black empowerment investment holding  
company. 
With regard to the first transaction,  the Commission found an overlap in the activities of the  
merging parties in respect of the provision of group and individual life insurance policies.   The 
Commission however, defined a broad market for the provision of long term insurance based on  
the fact that an insurer, which is issued with a license  to render long­term insurance,  has a  
choice   to   either   provide   group   cover   and/or   individual   cover.     Therefore,   according   to   the  
Commission, from a supply side substitution point of view, an insurer which is rendering group  
cover can render individual cover and visa versa. 8
In the second transaction, the Commission identified the following relevant markets:
1. the provision of administration, consultancy and brokerage services; and
2. the provision of electronic money transfer services.
The Commission based their finding on the following:
1. Sanlam Life and Total Care Strategy  (Pty) Ltd (subsidiaries of Sanlam) as well  
as   Simeka   Employee   Benefit   Holdings   (Pty)   Ltd   (which   IFS   has   a   minority  
shareholding in) operate as administrators, consultants and brokers to groups.  
Thebe Employee Benefits, a wholly owned subsidiary of Thebe, also operates in  
this market. 
2. Multi­Data   (Pty)   Ltd,   a   wholly   owned   subsidiary   of   Sanlam   Life   and   Thebe

Investment Trasactiv, a wholly owned subsidiary of Thebe both provide electronic  
money transfer services.
According to the Commission, the increment in market shares in all the above markets  
3  These are  assurance and investment products offered to individuals.  The assurance products include  
life, disability,  sinking fund,  fund  and  health policies and the investment products include endowment  
policies and annuities.
4  These are and investment products offered to retirement funds and other groups, including insurance  
policies   issued   to   retirement   funds   as   an  integrated   product   (i.e.   as   a  packaged   solution).   Additional  
services and products offered by Sanlam Life can be found from page 686 of the record.
5  A list of these entities and their activities can be found on pages 689­691.
6  Being funeral policies and credit life policies.
7  Being funeral policies (assistance polices) and life policies offered to companies, retirement funds and  
other groups.
8  At page 4 of the Commission’s report.
2

will   be   less   than   1%   and   therefore   does   not   raise   any   competition   concerns.  
Furthermore, the Commission is of the view that in all the relevant markets identified,  
the merged entity faces competition from other players with larger market shares.
We do not find it necessary to make a definitive finding on the relevant markets, as we  
are of the view that the merger will not result in a substantial lessening of competition.  
We have no other concerns and are satisfied that there are no significant public interest  
issues, which arise, and we accordingly approve this transaction unconditionally. 
           19 April 2005
N Manoim             Date
Concurring: Y Carrim and L Reyburn.
For the Acquiring firm:   I Gaigher (Jowell Glyn & Marais) 
For the Target firm: J.Katz (Webber Wentzel Bowens)  
For the Commission:     M Mohlala and E Mtantato  (Mergers and Acquisitions)
3