Nedbank Ltd / Investec Ltd / Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd and IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd (64/LM/Aug04) [2004] ZACT 70 (28 October 2004)

55 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Merger between Nedbank Ltd, Investec Ltd, Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd and The IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger, concluding that it would not substantially lessen competition — The acquiring firms are not in the same market as the target firm, and the target firm holds a market share below 10% — No significant public interest concerns were identified, leading to unconditional approval of the transaction.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: 64/LM/Aug04
In The Large Merger Between: 
Nedbank Ltd, Investec Ltd, Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd
And
The IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1. On   27   October   2004   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance   Certificate  
approving   the   transaction   between   Nedbank   Ltd,   Investec   Ltd,   Hosken   Consolidated  
Investments Ltd and The IQ Business Group (Pty) Ltd. The reasons for this decision follow. 
The Parties 
2. The   primary   acquiring   firms   are   Nedbank   Ltd   (“Nedbank”),   Investec   Ltd   (“Investec”)   and  
Hosken Consolidated Investments Ltd (“HCI”). 
3. Nedbank   is   ultimately   controlled   by   Old   Mutual   Plc,   a   company   listed   on   the   London  
Securities Exchange.    No firm controls  Old Mutual Plc. Investec is not controlled  by any  
single entity and is listed on the JSE Securities Exchange. Its largest shareholder grouping  
comprises an empowerment consortium (comprising the Tiso Group, the Peu Investment  
Group,   a   broad­based   Entrepreneurship   Development   Trust   and   an   Investec   Employee  
Share Trust), which holds 25,1% of the issued shares of Investec. Sactwu Educational Trust  
and Southern African Clothing and Textile Workers Union jointly control HCI (11% and 34%  
respectively).
4. The   primary   target   firm   is   The   IQ   Business   Group   (Pty)   Ltd   (“IQ”).   Pre­acquisition,   the  
primary acquiring firms are shareholders in the target firm.
The transaction
5. The transaction involves the acquisition of additional shares in the IQ’s share capital by the  
acquiring firms. This in effect amounts to a recapitalisation of IQ Business Group.
The Parties’ Activities

6. Nedbank provides banking and related services through out the Republic of South Africa.  
Investec provides a wide range of financial products and services, viz. investment banking,  
treasury and specialized finance, private banking and client portfolio management and asset  
management.   HCI   is   an   investment   holding   company,   which   invests   in   the   media   and  
broadcasting, gaming, information technology and financial services.
7. IQ provides project management and process enhancement services including the use of  
information technology skills and tools to achieve such business process enhancement. IQ  
designs,   implements   and   manages   technology   enabled   business   processes   in   financial  
services, healthcare and supply chain management. 1
Impact on competition
8. None of the acquiring firms are involved in the same market as IQ. However, while there is  
no   horizontal   overlap   in   the   activities   of   the   parties,   IQ   and   Nedbank   are   in   a   vertical  
relationship as IQ provides services to Nedbank. Along with Nedbank, IQ also provides the  
following   services   to   other   banks:   Project   management,   business   analysis,   software  
development   and   contracting.   These   services   are   provided   as   composite   packages   of  
services to their clients. 
9. IQ  is,   however,   a relatively   small  player  as  its  market  share  is  below  10%.  There  are  a  
number   of   other   players   in   the   market   and   according   to   a   competitor   of   IQ,   the   service  
market   was   a   “buyers   market   in   that   customers   [were]   always   playing   one   competitor  
against   the   other   and   service   contracts   [were]   for   a   short   period   allowing   customers   to  
switch   to   alternate   providers   if   they   were   unhappy   with   services   rendered.” 2  The  
Commission in its investigation found that if customers of IQ, the banks in particular, did not

wish   to   source   their   services   from   IQ   they   could   switch   to   other   providers   of   project  
management services.
Conclusion
10. Having   regard   to   the   above,   we   conclude   that   the   merger   will   not   lead   to   a   substantial  
lessening of competition and there are no significant public interest concerns.   Accordingly,  
we  agree with  the  Commission’s   recommendation  that   the  transaction  be unconditionally  
approved.
04 November 2004
1  When asked by the tribunal to describe, in layman’s terms, what services IQ provides, Mr Pieter van  
Tonder, Group Financial Director of the IQ Business Group, replied that in essence IQ simplified business  
processes by applying technology in order “, to enable businesses to achieve maximisation [of the whole  
design of the system]”. With regard to the services provided to the banks, IQ, for example, helped simplify  
the   home   loan   application   process   (which   took   about   30­35   days),   by   developing   a   system,   which  
reduced the process to 2 days. At page 1­2 of the transcript.
2  At page 5 of the Competition Commission’s report.
2

D Lewis   Date
Concurring: N Manoim and M Mokuena
For the merging parties: L Mendelsohn and J Balkin (Edward Nathan & Friedland)
For the Commission: A Chetty (Mergers and Acquisitions)
3