Fluxrab Investments no. 90 (Pty) Ltd and Metcash Trading Africa Ltd and Metcash Aviation (Pty) Ltd (49/LM/Jun04) [2004] ZACT 59 (13 September 2004)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger Approval — Management buyout of Metcash Trading Africa Ltd and Metcash Aviation (Pty) Ltd by Fluxrab Investments No. 90 (Pty) Ltd — Tribunal approved merger without conditions — No overlap in activities of merging parties, as Fluxrab is dormant and Metcash operates in wholesale distribution of consumer goods — Merger will not remove a competitor and raises no public interest concerns — Approval granted based on absence of competitive harm and alignment with black economic empowerment objectives.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
        Case no.:  
49/LM/Jun04
In the large merger between: 
Fluxrab Investments no. 90 (Pty) Ltd 
and 
Metcash Trading Africa Ltd and Metcash Aviation (Pty) Ltd  
________________________________________________________________
Reasons
________________________________________________________________
Introduction
On   26   August   2004   the   Tribunal   approved   the   merger   between   Fluxrab  
Investments   No.   90   (Pty)   Ltd   and   Metcash   Trading   Africa   Ltd   and   Metcash  
Aviation (Pty) Ltd without conditions. The reasons are set out below.
The transaction
This is a management buy­out in which Fluxrab Investments no 90 (Pty) Ltd  
(“Fluxrab”) is acquiring the entire issued share capital of Metcash Trading Africa  
Ltd (“Metcash”) and Metcash Aviation (Pty) Ltd (“Metcash Aviation”) from Metro  
Cash and Carry Ltd (“Metro”). The transaction excludes Metcash Trading Limited  
Australia.
The shareholding in Fluxrab, the primary acquiring firm, will be as follows:
• Management Consortium 35%

• Nedcor Investments 1 30%
• Black Economic Empowerment Consortium (“BEE”) 2 25%
• Metaf Share Incentive Scheme 10%
The management consortium, Nedcor Investment, and the BEE consortium will  
jointly control Fluxrab.
 
The transaction, in its current form, was concluded because Metro’s major  
shareholders did not believe that listing Metcash on the JSE Securities Exchange  
South Africa would enhance Metro’s shareholder wealth nor achieve certain  
objectives such as black economic empowerment and establishing a distinct  
identity from Metro’s Australian subsidiary.   
   
Effect on Competition
There is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties. Fluxrab is a dormant  
company,   which   has   never   traded. 3  Metcash,   primarily,   has   interests   in   the  
market for the wholesale and distribution of fast moving consumer foods.  
The   merger   will   not   result   in   the   removal   of   a   competitor   as   the   transaction  
involves   a   management   buyout   and   will   accordingly   have   no   effect   on  
competition in the relevant market.
Public interest
The transaction raises no public interest concerns.
 
___________ 13 September 2004
1  Nedcor investments is controlled by Nedbank Ltd, a subsidiary of Nedcor Limited. Nedcor’s main  
shareholders are Old Mutual Life Insurance (South Africa) Limited with 33% and Old Mutual (South  
Africa Limited), with 18%.
2  The BEE consortium consists of African Renaissance Holdings Ltd, South African National Taxi  
Association, Contralesa Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Women Development Bank Investment Holdings  
(Pty) Ltd and Kumnandi (consortium of black individuals and the National Tourism and Hospitality  
Association). The different members of the consortium have interests in other firms, none of which are  
relevant to this transaction.
3  Nedcor Investments, Old Mutual Life Insurance and the African Renaissance consortium do not provide  
any services that overlap with those of the target firm.
2

D Lewis Date
Concurring: N Manoim, T Orleyn 
For the merging parties: Fluxmans Attorneys
For the Commission: K Ramathula  
3