Barloworld Motor (Pty) Ltd and Avis Southern Africa Limited (79/LM/Dec03) [2004] ZACT 11 (8 February 2004)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Merger between Barloworld Motor (Pty) Ltd and Avis Southern Africa Limited — Barloworld acquiring remaining shares in Avis to create a wholly owned subsidiary — Merger assessed under section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act — No substantial lessening of competition anticipated in relevant markets — Tribunal approves merger unconditionally, finding no public interest concerns that would alter this conclusion.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
     Case No: 79/LM/Dec03
In the large merger between: 
Barloworld Motor (Pty) Ltd 
and
Avis Southern Africa  Limited
Reasons for Decision
_________________________________________________________________
APPROVAL
On 3 March 2004 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate  
approving   the   merger   between   Barloworld   Motor   (Pty)   Ltd   and   Avis   Southern  
Africa Limited   in terms of section 16(2)(a). The reasons for the approval of the  
merger appear below.
The Parties
1. The primary acquiring firm is Barloworld Motor (Pty) Ltd (“BM”), controlled  
by Barloworld Limited (“Barloworld”). 
2. The  primary  target  firm   is   Avis   Southern  Africa  Limited  (“Avis”),   a  public  
company listed on the JSE and Namibian and Botswana stock exchanges.  
Barloworld presently accounts for 34% of the shares in Avis. Avis controls a  
number   of   car   rental   firms   in   South   Africa,   the   majority   of   which   do   not  
concern   us,   save   for   the   companies   listed   below.   Avis   is   a   holding  
company, under license from Avis plc and ultimately Avis Inc. in the U.S. It  
has operations in short and long term vehicle rental services. 
The Transaction
3. Barloworld is merely acquiring the remaining 65.3% of shares in Avis that it  
does   not   already   own.   This   will   take   place   by   means   of   a   scheme   of  
arrangement. Post merger Avis will be a wholly owned subsidiary of BM.

Merger Rationale
4. The   merger   promises   Avis   access   to   Barloworld’s   worldwide   resources.  
BM   wants   to   become   a   fully   integrated   motor   company   able   to   offer  
services in a wide range of related markets, like its competitors McCarthy  
and Imperial do. This transaction will enable it to enter the motor vehicle  
rental market. Currently, it is only a retailer in the market for new and used  
cars.
Activities of Parties
Barloworld
5. Barloworld   is  described   as  an  international   industrial   brand  management  
company. Barloworld’s only activity in SA that need engage us is its  motor 
division. BM is a retailer of new and used motor vehicles. It has some 50  
odd dealerships throughout SA from where it sells passenger, light, medium  
and heavy vehicle brands. It views itself as having a market share of 8.9%  
of total motor sales on the distribution level in RSA. 
Avis 
Avis Rent A Car
6. Avis   Rent   A   Car   provides   short­term   vehicle   rentals   and   services   to   the  
tourism and corporate market. It purchases its vehicles from manufacturers  
or suppliers. It regards itself as accounting for 38% of the short­term vehicle  
rental  market  in  SA. It  has 110 outlets  in  RSA.  It  incorporates  Avis  Van  
Rental   (operated   under   a   sub­license   from   15   locations   throughout   SA)  
which rents out trucks. 
Avis Fleet Services 
7. Provides   long­term   vehicle   rental   and   value   added   services   for   vehicle  
operators.   Such   value   added   services   include   vehicle   sourcing,  
BM­retailer AVIS
Avis Rent A  
Car
Avis Fleet  
Services
ZEDA  Car MallNew cars Used cars

administration,   fuel   management,   warranty,   accident   management,   and  
various   other   services.   There   are   various   leasing   options   available   to  
customers, which incorporate different types of service.   Its customers are  
mid­size companies, typically having a fleet of 10 cars but it also deals with  
larger and small companies and parastatals. 
Most of this division’s services are outsourced. This division is operated as  
a   joint   venture   with   Wesbank.   Also   provides   vehicle   financing   to   its  
customers. It regards itself as having about 20% of this market.
Zeda
8. Vehicles   from   Avis   Rent   A   Car   sold   here.   Once   maintenance   leases   or  
vehicle  life  expires,  or  the  vehicles  are  no longer  suitable for  use  in  the  
short­term   rental   market,   they   are   sold   through   Zeda   which   has   10  
branches across SA. It sells about 50% to the general public and the rest it  
sells in bulk to used vehicle dealers.
Car Mall
9. Vehicles from Avis Fleet Services are sold here. It disposes of about two  
thirds of its vehicles through 8 operations to the general public, and the rest  
to other second hand car dealerships on a wholesale basis. 
Relevant and Geographic  Markets
10. Barloworld is only active in car sales at retail level (dealership market) while  
Avis is only active in the short­term rental market and fleet services market.  
However,   Avis   sells,   as   a   by­product   of   its   rental   and   fleet   services  
business, used cars that are no longer required for renting, while BM sells  
traded­in     used   cars   and   cars   sourced   from   ancillary   businesses   and  
manufacturers. 
11. The overlap therefore is in respect of this (somewhat secondary) market for  
the   sale of used vehicle,   which the Commission defines as the relevant  
market.   The   parties   highlight   that   though   there   is   an   overlap   in   this  
secondary used car market, the merging parties do not compete directly, in

secondary used car market, the merging parties do not compete directly, in  
that different players focus on different segments within the market, that is,  
Zeda, Car Mall and BM all sell second hand vehicles of differing ages and  
mileages.
12. The   Commission   define   the   geographic   market   as   being   local,   in  
accordance with previous mergers in the motor vehicle industry. However,  
since local market shares are unavailable they provide market shares as  
furnished by the parties per province.

Impact on competition
Horizontal Aspects
13. The   parties   state   that   the   post­merger   market   share   in   any   local  
market will not exceed 15%. They assert  however that it is probably much  
less than this, in fact in certain provinces they estimated that it may not  
exceed   7%.     Other   players   are   active   in   this   market,   such   as   Unitrans,  
CMH, Super Group and a myriad of small independent firms selling used  
cars. We are therefore satisfied that this  market is competitive.
n. In any event, BM’s core business is in selling new vehicles, its sale  
of   used   cars   is  therefore  ancillary  to  this   main   business  and  they  
point out that the purpose of the merger is not to grow their market  
share in the secondary used vehicle market but to allow BM to offer  
a broader range of services as its competitors do.
15. We note that the rental business of Avis is under a license agreement with  
Avis Europe Plc, the UK parent company in London in London.   Avis Inc  
and   Avis   Plc   have   recently   acquired   the   rights   to   the   Budget   car   rental  
brand.   Avis   Plc   therefore   also   owns   the   Budget   car   rental   brand   in   EU,  
Africa,  Middle  East  and  Asia.  Budget is operated  by  McCarthy.   Though  
these arrangements are not relevant to this merger, we highlighted this area  
as   meriting   close   competition   scrutiny   in   a   previous   merger 1.     We  
accordingly   asked   the   Avis   representative   about   this   at   the   hearing.   He  
commented   that   the   two   companies   are   separately   run,   although   they  
operate under a common license.
Vertical Relationships
16. There are a few vertical relationships in that Avis buys some of its vehicles  
from   BM   and   provides   rental   services   to   them.   BM   too   provides   some  
maintenance and repair services to Avis. However these links existed pre­

maintenance and repair services to Avis. However these links existed pre­
merger   and   neither   firm   has   the   incentive   to   benefit   from   a   foreclosure  
strategy.
Conclusion
We   conclude   that   the   merger   will   not   lead   to   a   substantial   lessening   of  
1  See  Bidvest Group Limited and McCarthy Limited 04/LM/Jan04

competition.     The   Tribunal   therefore   approves   the   transaction   unconditionally.  
There are no public interest concerns which would alter this conclusion.
_____________ 8 February 2004
N. Manoim    Date
Concurring:  D. Lewis , T. Orleyn
For the merging parties:   Bowman Gilfillan Attorneys 
For the Commission:  M. Mohlala and K. Ramathula,   Competition 
Commission