Growthpoint Properties Limited and 100 Grayston Drive Property (Pty) Ltd / Block E Power Station Properties (Pty) Ltd (80/LM/DEC03) [2004] ZACT 10 (6 February 2004)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Growthpoint Properties Limited acquiring assets of 100 Grayston Drive Property (Pty) Ltd and Block E Power Station Properties (Pty) Ltd — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger, finding it would not substantially lessen competition in the Grade P office space market — The transaction involved Growthpoint acquiring properties previously leased to Investec, with no expected adverse effects on market dynamics or public interest concerns.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: 80/LM/DEC03
In The Large Merger Between: 
Growthpoint Properties Limited
And
100 Grayston Drive Property (Pty) Ltd
Block E Power Station Properties (Pty) Ltd
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1. On   04   February   2004   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance   Certificate  
approving the transaction between Growthpoint Properties Limited and 100 Grayston Drive  
Property   (Pty)  Ltd   and   Block   E  Power   Station   Properties   (Pty)  Ltd.   The   reasons   for   this  
decision follow. 
The Parties 
2. The primary acquiring firm is Growthpoint Properties Limited (“Growthpoint”), a property loan  
stock company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange under the “real estate holding  
and development” sector. Growthpoint is currently managed by Growthpoint Managers (Pty)  
Ltd, which has in turn appointed Investec Property Group limited to administer Growthpoint’s  
portfolio of properties on its behalf.
3. The primary target firms are 100 Grayston Drive Property (Pty) Ltd (“Grayston”) and Block E  
Power Station Properties (Pty) Ltd (“Block E”). Both firms are wholly owned subsidiaries of  
Investec   Employee   Benefits   Limited   (“IEB”),   which   is   ultimately   controlled   by   Investec  
Limited.  However, in an interlinked transaction, IEB has disposed of the entire issued share  
capital   of   both   target   firms   to   Basfour   2885   (Pty)   Ltd   (“Basfour”).   Basfour   is   a   special  
purpose vehicle, wholly owned by Yonbor Nominees (Pty) Ltd. 1
The Transaction
4. This is the 2 nd  phase of a two­phased deal. In the 1 st  phase, as stated above, IEB sold  
1  This transaction was categorized as an intermediate merger and is currently under investigation by the  
Competition Commission.

100% of the issued share capital  in the target firms to  Basfour.    In this,  the  2 nd  phase,  
Growthpoint will acquire the assets of the target firms namely:
• The   immovable   property   upon   which   Investec   conducts   its   business   in   Sandton,  
Johannesburg,  namely, the “Sandton Head office”, and in Cape Town,   the “Investec  
Cape Town Building”.
• The   40,5%   interest   Grayston   has   in   Merchant   Place   Parkade   share   block   (Pty)   Ltd  
(“Merchant Place”) which owns the property adjacent to the Sandton Head office, which  
is   used   as   a   parking   garage   for   Investec   employees,   namely,   the   “Merchant   Place  
Parkade”.
5. Growthpoint will then lease back the target properties to Investec Bank Limited for a period  
of 20­years.  
The Parties’ Activities
6. Growthpoint is a property holding company, which derives its income from rentals received  
from   tenants,   as   well   as   from   investments   in   other   property   loan   stock   companies.  
Growthpoint’s physical property portfolio is diversified, with 122 retail, industrial, commercial  
and   warehouse   properties   comprising   approximately   1,4   million   m 2   located   throughout  
South Africa and Namibia.
7. Grayston receives rentals from tenants in the Sandton Head office as well as rentals from  
tenants   of   580   parking   bays   in   the   Merchant   Place   Parkade,   by   virtue   of   its   interest   in  
Merchant Place.
8. Block E receives rentals from tenants in the Investec Cape Town building,  which is also  
graded as Grade P office space. 
The Relevant market
9. The Commission identifies the relevant product market as that of   Grade P office space . In  
Growthpoint   Properties   Ltd   and   Primegro 2,   the   Tribunal   accepted   the   different   product  
markets within the property industry according to grades: 
“Office properties are sub­divided into different classes, for example grade P, A, B, or C Office  
Property”.  3

Property”.  3
10. The Commission identified the relevant geographic market as local in the Sandton node .4 
The   Sandton   node   consists   of:   Sandton   CBD,   Rivonia,   Illovo,   Houghton,   Melrose,   Hyde  
Park, Rosebank and Bryanston. 
2  29/LM/Jun03
3  ibid. at Page 2. “... Office Property is graded according to the age of a building, the quality of the office  
accommodation, parking and other finishing touches to building with grade P being a top quality property  
and C an older building without, for example, air­conditioning and parking...”  at Footnote 3.
4  The parties and the Commission based their geographic market analysis on the different nodes as  
identified by the South African Property Owners Association ("SAPOA"), which are used by all  
participants in the industry. 
2

11. The Sandton Head office and the Investec Cape Town Building are both graded as Grade P  
office space. However, while the former is located in the Sandton node, the latter falls within  
a different geographic area, viz. Cape Town. 
12. Since Growthpoint owns one Grade P office property in Illovo, there is an overlap in respect  
of the identified relevant market, i.e. Grade P Office space in the Sandton node.
Impact on competition
13. The   acquisition   of   the   target   properties   will   increase   Growthpoint’s   total   asset   base.  
However, since SAPOA’s data are only based on the Grade A market, no accurate market  
shares are available, in respect of the Grade P market, and the impact the acquisition is  
likely to have on Growthpoint’s market share in this market. The parties, however, in their  
competitiveness report, submit that Growthpoint’s market share in the relevant market will  
increase from 4% to 6.25%.
14. The parties further cite at least 9 new entrants to the relevant market in the past three years.  
This indicates that barriers to entry are low. 
15. According to the Commission, the transaction does not change the characteristics of the  
market   in  which   Growthpoint   competes.   The   target   properties   were  previously   leased   by  
Investec   from   Grayston,   which   was   a   subsidiary   of   the   Investec   Group.   This   lease  
agreement (with Growthpoint being the landlord) is being maintained for a 20­year period.  
Since   Investec   negotiated   its   own   lease   agreement,   prior   to   the   transaction,   it   is   highly  
unlikely to be prejudiced by the transaction. 
16. As   stated   above,   Growthpoint’s   property   portfolio   is   administered   by   Investec   Property  
Group and accordingly does not have any employees. Neither of the target firms have any  
employees, as the administration of the properties is currently performed by Investec Bank

employees, as the administration of the properties is currently performed by Investec Bank  
Limited   being   the   employer   of   all   the   staff   performing   the   property   administration   of   the  
target firms. There are therefore no employment losses attributable to the merger.
Conclusion
17. Having   regard   to   the   above,   we   conclude   that   the   merger   will   not   lead   to   a   substantial  
lessening of competition and there are no public interest concerns.   Accordingly, we agree  
with the Commission’s recommendation that the transaction be unconditionally approved.
 6 February 2004
D Lewis   Date
Concurring: N Manoim and U Bhoola
3

For the merging parties:  Elmarie Barnard (Jowell Glyn Marais)
For the Commission: Maarten Van Hoven (Mergers and Acquisitions)
4