Clidet No. 441 (Pty) Ltd and Global Roofing Solutions (Division of Dorbyl Limited) (15/LM/Apr03) [2003] ZACT 28 (4 June 2003)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Merger between Clidet No. 441 (Pty) Ltd and Global Roofing Solutions approved by the Competition Tribunal — Clidet, a management consortium vehicle, acquires GRS, a subsidiary of Dorbyl Limited, through a management buy-out — No overlap in product markets between acquiring and target firms — Tribunal concludes that the merger will not substantially lessen competition and raises no public interest concerns — Merger approved unconditionally.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
     Case No: 15/LM/Apr03
In the large merger between: 
Clidet No. 441 (Pty) Ltd
And
Global Roofing Solutions, a Division of Dorbyl Limited
Reasons for Decision
________________________________________________________________
APPROVAL
  On   14   May   2003   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance  
Certificate   approving   the   merger   between   Clidet   No.   441   (Pty)   Ltd   and 
Global Roofing Solutions, a Division of Dorbyl Limited, in terms of section  
16(2)(a). The reasons for the approval of the merger appear below.
The Parties
1. The primary acquiring firm is Clidet No. 441 (Pty) Ltd (“Clidet”), a special  
purpose   vehicle   created   to   house   the   investment   of   the   management  
consortium.   The consortium comprises senior management of GRS and  
ABSA Bank Limited through its division, ABSA Corporate and Merchant  
Bank  (“ACMB”), which will  control  Clidet.  ABSA  is a  financial  institution  
providing   all   types   of   financial   services,   including   retail   and   merchant  
banking. 
2. The   primary   target   firm   is   Global   Roofing   Solutions   (“GRS”),   a   wholly­
owned   subsidiary   of   Dorbyl   Limited.     It   comprises   Brownbuilt   Metal  
Sections   (“BMS”)   and   HH   Robertson   (“HHR”),   businesses   engaged   in  
manufacturing    a  range  of  roofing  products.  GRS  is  a  public  company,  
listed   on   the   JSE   under   the   “basic   industry’s   construction   and   building

materials list.
The Merger Transaction
3. This transaction is being effected via a management buy­out of Dorbyl’s  
GRS division in terms of which Clidet will post­merger own GRS. Clidet  
will   be   held   as   to   55%   by   GRS   Investment   Trust   (the   beneficiaries   of  
which are the current management of GRSand as to 45% by ABSA Bank  
(the Clidet consortium).
4. Control   will   vest   in   Clidet’s   Board   of   Directors,   comprising   the   GRS  
Investment Trust and ABSA. ABSA will have certain veto rights in the new  
entity, as security for its investment. 
Rationale for the Transaction 
5. Dorbyl is disposing of its roofing business, as part of its restructuring, to  
Clidet,   which   is   acquiring   the   business   as   a   going   concern.   ABSA   is  
funding the MBO (debt), at the same time acquiring an equity stake in the  
transaction (equity) to protect its investment in Clidet and ensure its loans  
are repaid. 
The Relevant Market
6. BMS produces roofing products for commercial and industrial use, under a  
variety of brand names. These products are increasingly being exported  
into the African continent and abroad. Domestically, the majority of GRS’  
products are  sold  to  roofing  contractors. GRS’  main  suppliers are Iscor  
and Beckers Paints. 
7. The GRS parties stated that there were two identifiable markets, namely  
separate roofing and decking markets. 
8. ABSA is primarily engaged in the financial services market and holds no  
interest or shareholding in other companies operating in similar products  
of the target firm.
6.

Impact on competition
9. There   is   no   product   overlap   since   GRS   and   ABSA   operate   in   different  
relevant markets. It is therefore not necessary to provide market shares of  
the key players in the roofing products market.
Conclusion
We   conclude   that   the   merger   will   not   lead   to   a   substantial   lessening   of  
competition.    There   are   no   public   interest   concerns   which   would   alter   this  
conclusion. The merger is therefore approved unconditionally. 
_____________ 4 June 2003
N. Manoim    Date
Concurring: U. Bhoola, P. Maponya
For the merging parties:   Cliffe Dekker Attorneys 
For the Competition Commission: H. Shozi, S. Nunkoo