Corpcapital Investments (Pty) Ltd and CICL Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (09/LM/Feb03) [2003] ZACT 25 (13 May 2003)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Corpcapital Investments (Pty) Ltd and CICL Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd — Corpcapital, through a consortium, sought to acquire CICL, a shell company, along with two other firms. Only the acquisition of CICL met the notification threshold under the Competition Act. The merger was assessed for its effect on competition, revealing no horizontal or vertical overlap between the merging parties' activities, and thus it was determined that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition. Additionally, the transaction posed no public interest concerns, such as retrenchments. The Competition Tribunal approved the merger, issuing a Merger Clearance Certificate.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
        Case no.: 09/LM/Feb03
In the large merger between: 
Corpcapital Investments (Pty) Ltd
and 
CICL Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd  
_______________________________________________________________________
Reasons
_______________________________________________________________________
Approval
On   30   April   2003   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance   Certificate  
approving the merger between Corpcapital Investments (Pty) Ltd and CICL Investment  
Holdings (Pty) Ltd. The reasons are set out below.                   
The transaction
A consortium of investers, represented by Corpcapital Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd  
(“Corpcapital”), intend to acquire three companies via three separate transactions namely:
1. CICL Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“CICL”)
2. Chastead Investments (Pty) Ltd (“Chastead”)
3. Brummers Funeral Insurance Company (Pty) Ltd (“Brummers”)
Of the above three transactions only the first transaction, i.e. the acquisition of CICL by  
Corpcapital, meets the determined threshold for a merger to be notifiable in terms of the  
Act. The second and third transactions fall outside the Commission’s jurisdiction. 
In the the first transaction Corpcapital Investments will acquire, on behalf of purchasers  
nominated by Corpcapital Investments, all the issued share capital in and claims on the  
loan account against CICL from Unifer. In terms of the second transaction Oakwood and  
Stenny will sell all their shares in Chastead to CICL and in terms of the third transaction  
CICL will acquire all the shares and claims on loan account in Brummers. Following the

completion of all three transactions Brummers and Chastead will be wholly owned  
subsidiaries of CICL.  Corpcapital and Ellerines, holding 30% and 37.5% respectively,  
will control CICL.  The remaining shareholders in CICL will be Oakwood with 12.5%,  
Stenny 12.5% and Expectra 7.5%. Oakwood, Stenny and Expectra are each entities  
owned by management of the core businesses within the newly structured CICL.
CICL, the primary target firm, is a shell company incorporated for the purpose of holding  
shares and loan accounts in Constantia Insurance Company Ltd, Peoples’ Industrial  
Advice Centre (Pty) Ltd (“PIA”) and PIA Finance Ltd.
Effect on Competition
Corpcapital operates in the financial services industry and provides investment banking  
and private equity, property asset management, corporate finance, financial products and  
funding and group suppor services. 
Ellerines operates in the retail furniture and household appliance sector. Its wholly owned  
subsidiary CPICL is a short­term insurer. However, it operates under a licence that limits  
it to providing consumer insurance to Ellerine’s credit customers only.
CICL’s subsidiary, Constantia, is also a short­term niche insurer deriving income mainly  
from underwriting activities and from renting out its insurance licence. PIA provides  
underwriting manager services while PIA Finances is a dormant company. 
Although both CPICL and Constantia are active in the short­term insurance market they  
do not compete in the same market due to CPICL’s limited trading license. None of  
Corpcapital’s business activities overlap with those of CICL.
There is thus no horizontal product overlap or vertical integration between the products  
of the merging parties. We therefore agree with the Commission that the merger will not  
substantially prevent or lessen competition 
Public interest considerations
The transaction will not result in any retrenchments and does not raise any other public  
interest grounds. 
   
____________ tt.08.08
N Manoim Date

interest grounds. 
   
____________ tt.08.08
N Manoim Date
Concurring: D Lewis, L Reyburn 
2