Reutech Engineering Services (Pty) Ltd and ATC (Pty) Ltd (85/LM/Dec02) [2002] ZACT 73 (20 December 2002)

55 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Merger between Reutech Engineering Services (Pty) Ltd and ATC (Pty) Ltd — Reutech acquiring a further 50.87% of ATC shares, resulting in 79% ownership — No product overlap between merging parties and no significant lessening of competition in the market — Public interest issues not arising from the transaction — Merger approved by the Competition Tribunal in terms of section 16(2)(a).

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
     Case No: 85/LM/Dec02
In the large merger between: 
Reutech Engineering Services (Pty) Ltd
and
ATC (Pty) Ltd
________________________________________________________________
Reasons for Decision
________________________________________________________________
Approval
On   19   December   2002   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance  
Certificate   approving  the   merger  between  Reutech   Engineering  Services  (Pty)  
Ltd and ATC (Pty) Ltd in terms of section 16(2)(a). The reasons for the approval  
of the merger appear below.
The merger transaction 
Reutech Engineering Services (Pty) Ltd (“Reutech”) who already owns 28.13% of  
the shares in ATC (Pty) Ltd (“ATC”) is acquiring a further 50.87% of the shares in  
ATC, which were previously held by Marconi Communications Africa (Pty) Ltd  
(28.13%) and Associated Electrical Industries Limited (22.74%) 1. On completion  
of the transaction Reutech will be the majority shareholder with approximately  
79% shareholding in ATC.
Reutech, the primary acquiring company, is a dormant firm, which is wholly  
owned by Reunert Ltd.
1  Associated Electrical Industries Ltd is controlled by Marconi Plc, a London company.

The current shareholders in ATC are Marconi Communications Africa (Pty) Ltd,  
Associated Electrical Industries Ltd, Reutech Engineering Service (Pty) Ltd and  
African Cables Ltd. 2 
Rationale for the transaction
According to the parties ATC lost a major Telkom order at the end of 1999, which  
resulted   in   significant   retrenchments 3,   apparently,   because   its   empowerment  
credentials were not in line with Telkom’s expectations. Due to ATC’s extremely  
complex   shareholding   and   the   fact   that   existing   shareholders   did   not   want   to  
dilute their shareholding it was not possible to introduce a black empowerment  
shareholder.   However,   all   this   will   change   after   the   transaction   is   completed  
since the new shareholders intends to introduce a significant black empowerment  
component. 
The relevant product market 
We   agree   with   the   Commission   that   there  is   no   product   overlap   between  the  
merging parties. 
As stated above, the acquiring firm is a dormant company held by Reunert, which  
is   engaged   in   the   manufacture   of   electronics   and   low­voltage   electrical  
engineering. ATC specialises in the manufacture of telecommunication cable for  
public network operators such as Optical fiber, Optical fiber Cables and Copper  
Cables. 
Effect on competition
ATC   sells   its   cables   directly   to   Telkom,   which   is   the   only   company  
responsible   for   laying   the   cables   used   in   the   transmission   of   electrical  
signals.4 Other players that also sell optical fiber communication cables to  
Telkom   are   Aberdare   and   M­Tec.   Aberdare   also   provides   Telkom   with  
copper communication cables.  
In light of the fact that the market structure will not change as a result of the  
2  African Cables is a joint venture between Reunert Ltd (holding 49% of the shares) and Pirelli Spa  
(holding 51% of the shares). African cables manufacture insulated electrical power cables.

(holding 51% of the shares). African cables manufacture insulated electrical power cables. 
3  ATC’s fiber plant at that time was totally dependent on receiving work from Telkom.
4  The merger therefore does not raise any vertical integration concerns.
2

transaction we find that the transaction will not significantly lessen or prevent  
competition in the relevant market. 
Public Interest Issues
No employment or other public interest issues arise as a consequence of the  
transaction.
_____________ 20 December 2002
D. Lewis Date
  
Concurring: N.M. Manoim, M. Holden
3