Nampak Limited and Malbak Limited Namakwa Sands (a division of Anglo Operations Limited) (29/LM/May02) [2002] ZACT 45 (15 July 2002)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Unconditional approval of merger between Exxaro Limited and Namakwa Sands (a division of Anglo Operations Limited) — Transaction dependent on prior approval of related merger (Project Pangolin) — No substantial change in market structure for mineral sands or zinc — No public interest concerns raised — Tribunal finds merger does not prevent or lessen competition.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
    Case No: 13/LM/Feb06
In the matter between:                                                       
Exxaro Limited        Acquiring Firm
And
Namakwa Sands (a division of Anglo Operations Limited)             Target Firm
Panel : N Manoim (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal 
Member), and U Bhoola (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 24 ­ 25 July 2006
Decided on : 15 August 2006   
Reasons Issued: 14 September 2006
Reasons for Decision
APPROVAL
1] On 15 August 2006 the Tribunal unconditionally approved, the merger between  
Exxaro Limited and Namakwa Sands (a division of Anglo Operations Limited).  
Although this transaction was filed separately, it is dependent on the approval  
of the merger between Mainstreet 333 (Pty) Ltd and Kumba Resources Limited  
under   case   number   14/LM/May06.   The   Tribunal   considered   the   transactions  
simultaneously and both were approved unconditionally. The merger between  
Mainstreet   333   (Pty)   Ltd   and   Kumba   Resources   Limited   is   referred   to   as  
“Project  Pangolin”.  The  current  transaction,   the  merger between   Exxaro  and  
Namakwa   Sands,   is   referred   to   as   the   “Namakwa   option.”   The   reasons   for  
approving the transaction follow.

THE PARTIES
2] The primary acquiring firm is Exxaro Limited (“Exxaro”). After the completion of  
Project Pangolin transaction, the major shareholder in Exxaro will BEE Holdco.  
BEE Holdco will control approximately 55% of Exxaro. BEE Holdco will, in turn,  
be   indirectly   controlled   by   Eyesizwe   Mining,   by   virtue   of   its   shareholding   in  
Eyesizwe SPV (the Eyesizwe SPV will hold approximately 55% in BEE Holdco) 
3] The primary target firm is the Namakwa Sands Mining Business (“Namakwa  
Sands”), a division of Anglo Operations Limited (“AOL”). AOL is a wholly owned  
subsidiary   of   Anglo   South   Africa   (Pty)   Ltd,   which   is   controlled   by   Anglo  
American South Africa Limited (“Anglo American”). 1
4] After the completion of Project Pangolin Anglo American will own, directly or  
indirectly 23% interest in Exxaro  
THE TRANSACTION
5] The Namakwa option is conditional upon the completion of Project Pangolin.  
The Namakwa   option  involves   Anglo  American  granting  Exxaro  an option  to  
acquire   firstly   its   Namakwa   Sands   division   and   secondly,   to   acquire   a   26%  
minority   interest   in   its   South   African   zinc   operations,   Black   Mountain   and  
Gamsberg. This will include an option to conclude an off­take agreement which  
will give Exxaro the right to zinc concentrate produced by the Black Mountain  
concentrator. 
6] Anglo   American   currently   owns   100%   of   Namakwa   Sands   and   has   a   66%  
indirect interest in Ticor SA through its interests in Kumba Resources Limited  
(“Kumba”). At the completion of Project Pangolin but before the implementation  
of   this   transaction   (Namakwa   option)   Anglo   American   will   still   own   100%   of  
Namakwa Sands, but its interests in Ticor SA will have declined to 23% through  
its   direct   or   indirect   economic   interest   in   Exxaro.   At   the   completion   of   this  
transaction,   Namakwa   Sands   and   Ticor   SA   will   effectively   remain   under

transaction,   Namakwa   Sands   and   Ticor   SA   will   effectively   remain   under  
1  Anglo American South Africa is in turn controlled by Anglo American International, which is  
ultimately controlled by Anglo American plc. 
  2

common ownership.
THE RATIONALE FOR THE TRANSACTION
7] The rationale in Project Pangolin is fully set out in our decision in case number  
14/LM/Feb06 and it is not necessary for us to repeat it in this decision. The  
Namakwa   option   furthers   the   empowerment   objectives   referred   to   in   that  
decision  as it expands  the resource base that  Anglo  American is offering to  
Exxaro. 
COMPETITION ANALYSIS
Mineral Sands
8] The parties have submitted that there is no overlap between the operations of  
the controlling shareholder of BEE Holdco (the Eyesizwe SPV and through it,  
Eyesizwe Mining and Eyesizwe Holdings) and those of Namakwa Sands.
9] Anglo   American   effectively   controls   the   mineral   sands   in   this   transaction  
through   Kumba   (Via   the   Ticor   companies 2)   and   Namakwa   Sands.   This  
transaction does not lead to a substantial change of the structure of the mineral  
sands market since it will result in Anglo American’s mineral sands interests,  
being   consolidated   under   the   control   of   Exxaro   and   Anglo   American  
relinquishing control over all its current mineral sands interests. After acquiring  
Anglo   American’s   interests   in   the   mineral   sands   market,   Exxaro   will   also  
acquire Anglo American’s market share in that market. The market shares and  
the number of players in the mineral sands market will thus remain the same. 
Zinc
10] The Namakwa option does not raise vertical and horizontal issues in the zinc  
market. At the completion of Project Pangolin, but before the exercise of the  
Namakwa option, Exxaro will not have any zinc operations and will as a result  
2  The Ticor companies are Ticor SA (Pty) Ltd and Ticor Limited. 
  3

have no market share in the zinc market.
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
11] There are no public interest issues.
CONCLUSION
12] The transaction will not lead to a substantial prevention or lessening of 
competition. There are no public interest issues that may affect this conclusion.
________________ 14 September 2006
N Manoim  DATE
Presiding Member
Y Carrim and U Bhoola concur in the judgment of N Manoim.
Tribunal Researchers:  M Murugan­Modise and R Kariga
For the merging parties: Adv. D Unterhalter SC and Adv. J Wilson instructed by  
Webber Wentzel Bowens 
For the Commission : Adv. J Gauntlett SC and Adv. H Shozi instructed by the 
Commission and T Kekana  (Mergers and Acquisitions) 
  4