Islandsite Investments 149 (Pty) Ltd and Chlorchem (division of Sentrachem Limited) (17/LM/Mar02) [2002] ZACT 28 (23 April 2002)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Merger Control — Approval of merger — Islandsite Investments 149 (Pty) Ltd acquiring Chlorchem — No product market overlap — Pro-competitive effects — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between Islandsite Investments 149 (Pty) Ltd and Chlorchem, finding that the transaction would not substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant market, as there was no overlap in product interests and no public interest concerns were identified.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
     Case No: 17/LM/Mar02
In the large merger between: 
Islandsite Investments 149 (Pty) Ltd
and
Chlorchem, a division of Sentrachem Limited
________________________________________________________________
Reasons for Decision
________________________________________________________________
APPROVAL
On 17 April 2002 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate  
approving   the   merger   between Islandsite   Investments   149   (Pty)   Ltd   and  
Chlorchem, a division of Sentrachem Limited, in terms of section 16(2)(a). The  
reasons for the approval of the merger appear below.
The parties
1. The acquiring firm, Islandsite Investments 149 (Pty) Ltd.  (“Islandsite”), is a  
company having been established just for the purposes of this merger and  
has yet to commence trading.  
2. Islandsite is controlled by Investec Bank Limited (“Investec”), which is in  
turn   controlled   by   Investec   Group   Limited   and   ultimately   controlled   by  
Investec Holdings Limited. The minority shareholding in Islandsite is to be  
held by two individuals with expertise in the chemicals industry, namely  
Dave Whelan, Managing Director of Metsep SA (Pty) Ltd and Chris van  
Niekerk, CEO of PG Bison.
3. The   target   firm   is   Chlorchem,   a   company   engaged   in   the   Chemical  
industry,  a division of Sentrachem Limited (“Sentrachem”). Sentrachem,  
itself a division of Dow Southern Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd, of which the  
ultimate parent company is Dow Chemical Company. (“Dow”) 1
1  Dow entered the South African market in 1997 by the acquisition of Sentrachem.

4. The parties have informed us that Islandsite has no interest in any of the  
target firms other than through this transaction.
The merger transaction 
5. Islandsite is acquiring the business of Chlorchem as a going concern. 
6. The   Managing   Director   and   management   team   of   Chlorchem   will   be  
retained post­merger.   The proposed ordinary shareholding of Islandsite  
post­merger is:
Investec Bank Limited 49.99%
Chris van Niekerk 25.001%
Dave Wheelin 2 25.001%
7. Investec   are   the   holders   of   all   the   convertible   shares   which   can   be  
converted   to   full   voting   rights   on   demand.   By   virtue   of   this   right   of  
redemption, should they choose to convert their shares, they would have  
an   85%   interest   in   the   company,   with   the   minorities   and   management  
having a 15% interest. Generally however, they will not get involved in the  
day to day business of Chlorchem.
Rationale for the Transaction
8. Islandsite   is   the   vehicle   by   means   of   which   Investec   is   acquiring   the  
business as an investment opportunity in the chemicals industry. It will on  
sell the business in due course. Dow Chemical, most active in the plastics  
and agroscience business, seeks to dispose of a business that is non­core  
and has no synergies with its other businesses.
The relevant product market
2  Managing Director of Metsep SA (Pty) Ltd, which is also involved in the manufacture  
of hydrochloric acid. On further questioning by the panel it appeared that Metsep is not  
really a competitor in the industry as its customer base is different. The parties stated that  
Metsep’s business is distinguishable, in that it relates to the recovery and regeneration of  
hydrochloric acid for essentially the metals beneficiation industry. 
2

9. Investec is engaged in the banking and financial services sector. It  
has at present no interest whatsoever in the chemical industry. The other  
two shareholders are ,subject to the qualification mentioned in relation to  
Whelan’s  interest   in   Metsep,   not   owners  of   any  significant   stake  in   the  
relevant industry.
10. The business of Chlorchem consists of Chlor Alkali and  Walvis Bay Salt  
Refiners of Namibia. Basically, Chlorchem manufactures and distributes  
chlorine and associated products, such as chlorine, caustic soda and salt.  
Walvis   Bay   Salt   Refiners   produces   chemical   grade   and   food   and  
agricultural salt. 
11. The   Commission   states   that   Chlorchem   operates   in   three  
areas: Chlor Alkali; water treatment (via Ultrafloc) and salt. The chlor  
alkali market can further be broken down into the following markets:  
3
o Liquid chlorine
 Hydrochloric acid
 Caustic Soda Lye
o Caustic Soda Flake
o Sodium Hypochlorite
o Chlorinated Paraffin  
12. There is no product market overlap because neither Investec nor  
any of its associated companies have any interest in the chlorine or salt  
markets. 
Geographical  Market
13. Since there is no product overlap it is not necessary to define the  
geographical market.
Vertical Integration
14. The   parties   advise   that   because   there   are   at   present   various   vertical  
relationships   between   Chlorchem   and   other   companies   within   the  
Sentrachem group, this merger will be pro­competitive, insofar as it will  
terminate   these   relationships.   The   relationship   of   Chlorchem   with   the  
Sentrachem group will, post­merger, become an arm’s length one. Post  
merger it appears that various companies within the Sentrachem group  
will become the largest customers of Chlorchem. We express no opinion  
3  Its main competitor in the Chlor Alkali market is Sasol Polymer.
3

about the validity of the claimed pro­competitive benefits as the merger  
raises no vertical concerns.
 
Conclusion
From   the   evidence   it   appears   that   there   are   close   co­operative   relationships  
between   firms   in   the   chlor   alkali   market,   particularly   between   Chlorchem   and  
Sasol   Polymer.   We   were   advised   at   the   hearing   that   these   relationships   are  
longstanding.4 The issue for us however is whether the merger, given this history  
in   the   industry,   facilitates   a   more   co­operative,   as   opposed   to   rivalrous  
relationship between the firms. As it appears that these relationships are struck  
at   an   operational   level   it   appears   that   the   change   of   ownership   will   have   no  
bearing on them.
The   Tribunal   endorses   the   Commission’s   finding   that   this   transaction   will   not  
substantially   lessen   or   prevent   competition   in   the   relevant   market   and  
accordingly approves the transaction unconditionally. There are no public interest  
concerns which would alter this conclusion.
_____________ 23  April 2002
N.M. Manoim Date
  
Concurring: D. Lewis, U. Bhoola
4  Evidence of Dr Barney Steyn.
4