Bidvest Group Limited and Voltex Holdings Limited (10/LM/Feb02) [2002] ZACT 21 (11 April 2002)

70 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger approval — Bidvest Group Limited acquiring additional shares in Voltex Holdings Limited — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger without conditions on 13 March 2002. Bidvest, already a significant shareholder in Voltex, aimed to consolidate control over the wholesaler of electrical goods as part of its strategy to own 100% of its subsidiaries. The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially lessen competition in the markets for electrical insulation tape and self-adhesive product labeling, as both firms had low market shares and the markets remained competitive with numerous alternative suppliers.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 10/LM/Feb02
In the large merger between: 
Bidvest Group Limited 
And
Voltex Holdings Limited
_______________________________________________________
Reasons
_______________________________________________________
Approval
1. On   13   March   2002   we   approved   without   conditions   the   merger  
between the Bidvest Group Limited (Bidvest) and Voltex Holdings  
Limited (Voltex). The reasons for the decision to approve the merger  
appear below. 
The Transaction
2. The acquiring firm is Bidvest, a public company listed on the JSE  
Securities   Exchange   under   the   Industrial   Services   Sector.   Bidvest  
comprises a group of companies involved in providing a wide range  
of services in South Africa. A summary of the services provided by  
the various subsidiaries of Bidvest appears in paragraph 6 below. 
3. Voltex, the target firm, primarily conducts business as a wholesaler of  
electrical goods.

4. Bidvest   is   acquiring   from   Power   Technology   Limited   (Powertech)  
32,5% of the issued share capital in Voltex. Bidvest currently holds  
approximately 32,34% of the issued share capital in Voltex. Minority  
shareholders   account   for   about   34,61%   shareholding   in   Voltex.  
Bidvest and Powertech have exercised joint control of Voltex since  
1998.
5. The reason given by Powertech for selling its share in Voltex is that  
the disposal forms part of a strategy of its holding company, Allied  
Electronics Limited, to simplify its group structure. Bidvest, on the  
other  hand, is  purchasing  because  in its opinion Voltex’s electrical  
wholesaling distribution operations fall directly within the scope of its  
commercial   products   division,   which   encompasses   trading   and  
distribution  operations.   The  purchase   is   also   in   line  with   Bidvest’s  
philosophy of preferring to own 100% of its subsidiaries. 
The Relevant Market
6. Bidvest,   through   various   subsidiaries,   provides   a   diverse   range   of  
business activities in South Africa. The following is a summary of the  
services provided by the various Bidvest subsidiaries:
• freight management ­ Bidfreight.
• Provision of a wide range of outsourcing activities, for example,  
security and contract cleaning, laundry services etc ­ Bidserv 
• Distribution of a wide range of products to catering and hospitality  
business ­ Caterplus
• Manufacturing and distribution of products to bakery, meat, food  
industries ­ Combined Foods
• provision of a wide range of services relating to travel and foreign  
currency ­ Rennies Financial Services
• provision of strategic direction and corporate services to Bidvest  
Group ­ Bid Corp Services
• provision of packaging closures, fastenings, strapping, stationery,  
adhesive tape, coding and labels ­ Bidpac
• office products , for example, stationery, furniture, computers etc ­  
Bidoffice

7. As   stated   above,   Voltex’s   primary   business   is   the   wholesale   of  
electrical products. 
8. Overlaps in the acquiring firm and target firm products occur in two  
areas: first, both the supply and distribute electrical insulation tape.  
Second,   both   firms   are   involved   in   the   manufacture   and   sale   of  
product   labeling   material 1,   more   specifically   self­adhesive   product  
labeling material. 
The electrical insulation tape market
9. Voltex   imports   electrical   insulation   tape   from   Taiwan   and   sells   to  
electrical   contractors;   electrical   wholesalers,   equipment  
manufacturers,   industry   and   mines.   Bidvest,   on   the   other   hand,  
produces insulation tape through a subsidiary, Buffalo Executape for  
sale   to   the   same   customers,   excluding   electrical   contractors   and  
wholesalers.   The   relevant   product   market   according   to   the  
Commission is therefore the market for the supply and distribution of  
electrical   insulation   tape.   The   relevant   geographic   market   is   South  
Africa.   The   parties   have   branches   all   over   South   Africa   and   the  
Commission found no evidence that the market is limited to specific  
regions.
 
The product labeling market
10.Another  overlap occurs in the manufacture and sale of  the product  
labeling material, specifically self­adhesive labeling material. Product  
labeling materials are produced via a two­step manufacturing process.  
In   the   upstream   market,   labeling   materials   manufacturers   obtain  
paper, film, release liners, adhesives, silicones and other materials for  
the   production   of   semi­finished   labels.   These   are   sold   to   printing  
companies,   also   known   as   “converters”   in   the   downstream   market  
where   the   label   material   is   further   processed   and   converted   into  
finished   products   in   accordance   with   the   product   manufacturers

finished   products   in   accordance   with   the   product   manufacturers  
1  The parties also sell the equipment used to mark and apply product labels, including pricing guns,  
barcode printers and plastic tags for attaching labels to clothing.

specifications.   The   finished   product   is   then   supplied   to   product  
manufacturers for labeling. The parties participate in the downstream  
market, that is, they are “converters”. 
11.The Commission’s  investigations  revealed that the product labeling  
market   consists   of   various   technologies   such   as   wet   glue   labeling,  
mould   labeling,   dry   gum   labeling,   direct   printing,   wrap   around  
labeling,   stretch/shrink   sleeving   and   self­adhesive   labeling.   The  
parties   argue   that   the   relevant   market   in   this   regard   is   the   broad  
market for the manufacture and sale of product labeling material. 
12.The Commission, on the other hand, argues that the product labeling  
market consists of various sub­markets depending on the technology  
used. The Commission’s investigations, which included an analysis of  
the   views   of   customers,   competitors   and   other   industry   players,  
revealed   that   the   interchangeability   between   the   various   labeling  
technologies is limited. There are a number of reasons for this. Firstly,  
the application of labels is not completely substitutable ­ some types  
of labeling material cannot be used in certain products, for example,  
wet glue labeling will not work on moist surfaces and is therefore not  
suitable   for   cold   or   frozen   food   products.   Secondly,   there   are  
significant price differences between labeling materials. In addition,  
each  type of  labeling  technology has a  distinct  production process.  
Most of the self­adhesive label producers indicated that because of the  
significant costs involved in converting from one technology to the  
other and the fact that self­adhesive labels are in such high demand,  
they would not consider doing so.  
13.The Commission argues therefore that each type of product labeling  
material   constitutes   a   sub­market.   It   concludes   that   the   relevant

material   constitutes   a   sub­market.   It   concludes   that   the   relevant  
product market for the purposes of this transaction is the sub­market  
for the manufacture and sale of self­adhesive product labels. 
Impact on Competition
The electrical insulation tape market

14.According to the parties this is a very competitive market with big  
players such as CashBuild, Pick n Pay, Massmart and other electrical  
wholesalers.   The   estimated   market   share   provided   by   the   parties  
indicate that Voltex is the largest supplier of insulation tape in South  
Africa with a market share of 6,24%. Bidvest is second with a market  
share   of   2,44%.   The   other   participants   in   this   market   each   have   a  
market share of just over 1% or less.
15.An issue not addressed in the Commission’s recommendation is the  
existence of a restraint of trade agreement preventing Powertech and  
another   company,   Altron,   from   competing   with   Voltex   in   the  
electrical wholesaling market for  a period of  three years. We were  
advised by the parties that this is historical clause ­ it arose out of sale  
by   Voltex   of   certain   manufacturing   businesses   to   Powertech.  
Powertech   demanded   that   Voltex   undertakes   not   to   compete   with  
these   manufacturing   businesses   and   the   reciprocal   of   that   was   that  
Powertech would not compete with Voltex in the electrical wholesale  
market. It appears that there is no wish on the part of Powertech to  
enter this market anyhow and the clause is simply there as a reciprocal  
for   Voltex’s   undertaking   not   to   compete   with   Powertech   in   the  
manufacturing business.
16.The market shares of the parties are very low and will be less than  
10% post merger. Concentration levels are also very low. We find that  
the   merger   is   unlikely   to   lead   to   a   lessening   or   prevention   of  
competition in the market for the supply and distribution of electrical  
insulation tape.
The product labeling market
17.There were no statistics  available to calculate  market shares of  the  
parties in the market for  the manufacture and sale  of  self­adhesive  
labels   as   the   industry   is   not   regulated.   The   Printing   Industries

labels   as   the   industry   is   not   regulated.   The   Printing   Industries  
Federation   verbally   informed   the   parties   that   the   estimated   overall  
turnover   in   self­adhesive   labels   in   1997   was   approximately   R500  
million. By postulating that this figure currently stands at about R600

million and based on their recent annual turnover figures, the parties  
estimate that their market shares approximately 18,67% for Bidvest  
and   1,6%   for   Voltex.   The   merged   entity   will   therefore   have   an  
estimated market share of 20,27%. They hasten to point out that the  
figure of R600 million is very conservative, in which case it is likely  
that their estimated market shares are overstated. 
18.With   no   reliable   market   share   figures,   the   Commission   sought   the  
views of the competitors of the parties regarding the likely effect of  
the   merger   on   competition   in   the   self­adhesive   labels   market.   The  
Commission   also   interviewed   the   Printing   Industries   Federation   of  
South   Africa   and   the   customers   of   the   merging   parties.   The  
competitors of the parties interviewed by the Commission informed it  
that there were more than 160 other participants in this market; the  
biggest of the lot being Flexoprint, Rebsons, New Era, Multiprint and  
Paul Frey. The Printing Industries Federation of South Africa saw no  
possibility of the merger leading to concentration in the market. The  
customers of the parties also expressed the view that there are enough  
alternative suppliers in the market for them to choose from. In this  
regard, the Commission found that generally each customer currently  
has more than two suppliers.
19.The Commission went on to establish that there was a significant level  
of import competition in the market, currently standing at about 30%  
of all finished products. It also found that there were low barriers to  
entry in the market, with evidence of very recent entry. International  
producers are also targeting the local market and have been entering  
through local distributors. Finally, product manufacturers, the parties’  
main   customers,   determine   demand   in   the   market.   Some   of   these  
customers   are   very   big   companies   and,   given   the   large   number   of

customers   are   very   big   companies   and,   given   the   large   number   of  
suppliers   of   self­adhesive   labeling   material   producers,   the   product  
manufacturers possess a significant amount of countervailing power.
Vertical Issues
20.The  takeover   of   a  dominant  wholesaler,  like  Voltex,  by  Bidvest,  a  
major logistics company, may raise concerns that the acquisition may  
help the wholesaler leverage its dominance in the downstream market.

This is an aspect of this transaction unfortunately not canvassed by the  
Commission   or   the   parties   in   their   papers.   At   the   hearing   it   was  
argued   by   the   parties   that   Voltex   has   over   the   years   had   adequate  
financial means to grow and sustain its business independently, and  
the   change   in   the   shareholding   as   a   result   of   the   merger   will   not  
change   this.   The   Commission   agreed   with   the   merging   parties’  
submissions   in   this   regard.   Even   though   we   do   not   have   much  
information on this point, it appears that Voltex’s position is already  
very strong in this market and if there are any vertical effects arising  
from the merger, they will not be substantial.
21.The Commission concludes that it is not likely that this merger will  
lead   to   substantial   competition   problems.   This   is   a   view   evidently  
shared   by   most   of   the   market   participants   interviewed   by   the  
Commission. We agree. Given the size of the estimated market shares  
of the merging parties and the structure of the market as revealed by  
the Commission’s investigations, the merger is unlikely to result in a  
substantial lessening or prevention of competition in this market.
Public Interest Considerations
22.No substantial public interest issues arise from the merger. We have  
been informed that because this transaction takes the form of a sale of  
shares, it will have no adverse impact on employment ­ none of the  
operating companies of the merging parties will retrench employees  
as a result of the merger.  
   
_____________ 11 April 2002
N.M. Manoim Date
Concurring: D.H. Lewis; P. Maponya