New Republic Bank Limiteda (subsidiary of Saambou Holdings Limited) and FBC Fidelity Bank Limited (a subsidiary of Nedcor Bank Limited) (42/LM/Jul01) [2001] ZACT 37 (21 September 2001)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition — Merger approval — New Republic Bank Limited acquiring rental and installment sale agreements from FBC Fidelity Bank Limited — Merger clearance granted without conditions — The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between New Republic Bank and FBC Fidelity Bank, determining that the transaction would not substantially lessen competition in the market for rental and installment sale agreements related to office automation equipment, as the post-merger market share of the combined entity would remain low at 2.3%, and the market was deemed competitive with low entry barriers.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
        Case No: 42/LM/Jul01
In the large merger between: 
New Republic Bank Limited, a subsidiary of Saambou Holdings Limited
and
FBC Fidelity Bank Limited, a subsidiary of Nedcor Bank Limited
________________________________________________________________
Reasons for Decision
________________________________________________________________
APPROVAL
On   12   September   2001   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   Merger   Clearance  
Certificate approving the merger between New Republic Bank Limited and FBC  
Fidelity Bank Limited without conditions in terms of section 16(2)(a). The reasons  
for the approval of the merger appear below.
The Parties
1. The primary acquiring firm is New Republic Bank Limited (“NRB”), a  
subsidiary of Saambou Bank Limited, which is ultimately controlled by  
Saambou Holdings Limited. 
2. NRB is acquiring 13,750 rental and installment sale agreements from  
FBC, a subsidiary of Nedcor Bank Limited. 
Background
3. FBC was placed under curatorship in October 1999. A year later, Nedcor  
acquired the entire issued ordinary share capital of FBC, by virtue of a  
scheme of arrangement in terms of section 311 of the Companies Act.  
4. Prior   to   FBC   going   into   curatorship   in   October   1999,   certain   brokers,  
engaged   in   the   business   of   selling,   servicing   and   delivering   office  
automation   equipment,   would   discount   the   rental   and   instalment   sale  
agreements in favour of FBC.

5. These discounting agreements essentially took the following form:
a. The broker entered into a discounting agreement with a bank;
b. The bank gains approval to make available funds up to a certain  
limit;
c. Brokers, having agreed with their clients that they will raise finance  
for   the   deals   it   brokers,   completes   the   installment   sale  
documentation;
d. Once the client signs this, it is submitted to the bank advancing the  
finance;
e. The bank pays out the discounted sum to the broker who then pays  
the proceed to the suppliers less his commission.
f. The bank then collects the rental or installments.
6. With   the   continuity   of   FBC’s   rental   and   instalment   sale   agreement  
business   being   interrupted   by   the   curatorship,   FBC   subsequently  
discontinued its relationships with the brokers. It concentrated merely on  
the collection of outstanding installments, as well as the disposal of blocks  
of agreements.
The merger transaction 
7. In terms of this transaction, NRB is continuing to restructure and integrate  
its  affairs  by acquiring a portion  of FBC’s assets,  namely  some  13,750  
rental and instalment sale agreements. These  are discounted agreements  
of   the   type   discussed   above,   and   particularly   relate   to   the   office  
automation equipment supply business.
8. Nedcor,  by  means  of  this  transaction,  seeks  to  relinquish  this  non­core  
debtor’s book acquired pursuant to rescuing FBC from liquidation. Nedcor  
lacks   the   infrastructure   and   strategic   intention   to   expand   this   particular  
market within its own operations. Accordingly, this transaction will relieve  
Nedcor of the burden of managing and administering such book.
9. The assets being transferred constitute only about 9% of FBC’s range of  
asset­based products. It will retain the installment sale and vehicle financing part  
of its business, as well as the franchise operations.

of its business, as well as the franchise operations.
10. Following the merger, the assets being transferred will be integrated into  
Planet   Finance   Bank,   a   division   of   Saambou   Limited   and   NRB   will  
continue to conclude these agreements with the brokers.

EVALUATING THE MERGER
The relevant market
11. NRB’s activities comprise a wide range of banking services, including the  
provision   of   mortgages,   term   loans   and   other   advances,   including  
instalment sales.
12. FBC provide a full range of asset­based products, including home loans,  
commercial property lonas; SMME franchise finance, term and personal loans  
and micro loans.  FBC also offers transmission savings accounts and fixed or  
notice deposit facilities.
13. Notwithstanding   the   overlap   between   both   parties   with   regard   to   the  
provision of like products, particularly home loans and micro loans, this  
transaction relates specifically to the a sale of a portion of the business of  
FBC   to   NRB,   namely   its   rental   and   instalment   sale   agreements.   The  
Commission accordingly defined the relevant market as the market for the  
provision of rental sale and installment sale agreement services . It seems  
that the market can be narrowed further, since the discounted agreements  
being   acquired   by   NRB   relates   primarily   to   the   financing   of   movable  
equipment, namely, office automation equipment. It is the Tribunal’s view  
that office equipment financing is a specialised product market,  separate  
from   the   market   for   other   types   of   asset   financing   such   as   vehicle  
financing. This is so especially since it is an accepted practice in the office  
automation   market   that   most   of   these   transactions   are   concluded   via  
brokers,  whereas  other  asset  finance   transactions  entail   direct   dealings  
with the client.
Geographical  Market
14. The Commission stated that the market was national since both NRB and  
FBC   provide   their   rental   and   installment   sale   agreement   services  
throughout   the   country.   By   extension,   rental   and   installment   sale  
agreements  with  respect   to   office   automation  equipment   would   also  be

agreements  with  respect   to   office   automation  equipment   would   also  be  
entered into on a nationwide basis. We accordingly accept this definition.

Market Shares 
15. The parties and  Commission relied on figures  obtained from  the DI900  
Reserve Bank returns. When questioned  by the  Tribunal  as to  whether  
these   figures   were   specific   to   the   office   equipment   rental   market,   or  
included other forms of financing, such as vehicle financing, they advised  
that   the   latter   position   was   the   case.   They   informed   us   that   the   DI900  
Reserve bank returns (from which their figures were extracted) provided  
no   separate   breakdown   in   respect   of   installment   sale   and   rental  
transactions in the office automation equipment market. Therefore, in the  
table   below   the   office   equipment,   rental   and   installment   sale   market   is  
subsumed into the figures for other types of leases, e.g. vehicles.
Competitor   Market   Share   in   respect   of   rental   and   installment   sale  
agreements
Institution  Value (RM)  % of Total
First National Bank 23 569 28.9%
ABSA Bank 19 532 23.9%
Standard Bank 17 658 21.6%
Nedcor Bank 11 185 13.7%
BoE Bank 2 547 3.1%
Citibank 1 204 1.5%
Saambou 1 186 1.4%
FBC Fidelity Bank 745 0.9%
TOTAL 77,626 100%
Source: NRB’s Form CC4(2)Schedule 5
16. On the parties’ estimates, the combined market share of the merged entity  
would be  2.3% post­merger. 
Impact on competition
17. While the post­merger market share of 2.3% is not significant enough to  
reduce competition in the market, we must consider that on the parties’  
admission,   this   figure   includes   other   forms   of   asset   financing,   such   as  
vehicle   financing.   Since   these   turnover   figures   might   be   quite   large   for  
banks   such   as   Stannic   and   FNB,   this   could   distort   shares   when   we  
consider the narrower office equipment financing market. Were the parties  
able to obtain separate figures for this latter market, such market shares  
could well be more inflated than the figure of 2.3%.

18. After   further   questioning,   it   nevertheless   appeared   that   the   market   for  
office  equipment  financing  is  very  competitive,  with  all   the  major  banks  
participating therein. Furthermore, entry barriers are low since banks can  
quite   easily   get   involved   in   this   type   of   financing   provided   they   have  
adequate funds and sophisticated collection systems.
19. On balance, the Tribunal is therefore of the opinion that this transaction  
will not substantially lessen competition in respect of rental and installment  
sale transactions in the office automation equipment market.
Public Interest Considerations
20. The parties submit that this transaction will have no effect on employment.
_____________ 21 September 2001
D.H. Lewis Date
  
Concurring: N. Manoim, D. Terblanche