BHP Steel Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd / BHP Minerals International Exploration Inc. / BHP World Exploration Inc. and Billiton SA Limited and Mine & Smelter Investments (Pty) Ltd (32/LM/Jun01) [2001] ZACT 24 (4 July 2001)

60 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Merger between BHP Steel Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd and Billiton SA Limited — Competition Tribunal issued merger clearance certificate approving the merger without conditions — The merger involves the combination of two global resource companies under a dual listed structure, allowing them to operate as a single economic entity while retaining separate listings — No overlap in product offerings or competition concerns identified within the South African market, as BHP does not have coal or steel production facilities in South Africa — Merger approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL 
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
        Case No: 32/LM/Jun01
In the large merger between: 
BHP Steel Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd
BHP Minerals International Exploration Inc. 
BHP World Exploration Inc.
and
Billiton SA Limited and Mine & Smelter Investments (Pty) Ltd
_______________________________________________________________________
Reasons for the Competition Tribunal’s Decision
_______________________________________________________________________
APPROVAL
On   28   June   2001   the   Competition   Tribunal   issued   a   merger   clearance   certificate  
approving   the   merger   between   BHP   Steel   Southern   Africa   (Pty)   Ltd,   BHP   Minerals  
International Exploration Inc. and BHP World Exploration Inc (BHP SA) and Billiton SA  
Limited   and   Mine   &   Smelter   Investments   (Pty)   Ltd     (the   Billiton   Group)   without  
conditions in terms of section 16(2)(a). The reasons for the approval of the merger appear  
below.
BACKGROUND
Acquiring Firms
1. The acquiring firms 1  are BHP Steel Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd, BHP Minerals  
International Exploration Inc., BHP Worldwide Exploration Inc, (“BHP SA”). 2 
They   are   ultimately   controlled   by   BHP   Limited,   (the   Broken   Hill   Proprietary  
Company   Limited   (“BHP   Limited”)).   BHP   Limited   is   an   Australian   company  
with a primary listing on the Australian Stock Exchange. It is a global natural  
1  For the purposes of the merger notification, and since   no assets or shares are being  
transferred, no firm is technically acquiring the other, therefore the Billiton Group was  
arbitrarily designated by the parties as the target firm and BHP Group as the acquiring  
firm.
2  Eloff Mining Company (Pty) Ltd and Phoenix Mining Finance Company (Pty ) Ltd are also part of the  
BHP stable in South Africa, however are, or are about to be dormant companies.

resource   company,   whose   principal   areas   of   business   include   minerals 
(exploration, production, processing of coal, copper, iron ore, diamonds, silver,  
lead and zinc),  petroleum  (exploration and production) and  steel production . It  
is headquartered in Melbourne and has a presence in over 30 countries.
Target Firms
2. The primary target firms are Billiton SA and Mine & Smelter Investments (Pty)  
Ltd. They are ultimately controlled by Billiton Plc, a global metals and mining  
company     with   a   primary   listing   on   the   London   Stock   Exchange. 3  It   has  
operations   in  Australia,   Brazil,   Canada,   Colombia,   Mozambique,   South   Africa  
and   Suriname.   The   two   primary   target   companies   have   sixty   subsidiary  
companies   in   South   Africa.   The   main   subsidiaries   conduct   Billiton’s   business  
activities   in   South   Africa   and   include   Ingwe   Collieries   Limited,   Billiton  
Aluminium   SA   Ltd,   Samancor   Ltd   and   Pering   Mine   (Pty)   Ltd.   (“the   Billiton  
Group”). 
The merger transaction  
3. This   transaction   is   in   pursuance   of   a   merger   transaction   between   the   parent  
companies   of   the   Billiton   Group   in   the   UK   and   those   of   the   BHP   Group   of  
Australia, in terms of which the two parent companies are being combined into a  
single economic entity. The merger will not involve the sale or transfer of any  
shares or assets.  4
4. This arrangement is being effected by way of a dual listed companies structure  
(“DLC”).5  On   completion   of   the   transaction   both   companies   will   continue   as  
separate publicly listed entities, retaining their existing stock exchange listings  
and index participations, though having identical Boards of Directors and being  
managed by a uniform team of management. Shareholders in Billiton and BHP  
will effectively hold shares in a single company, having equivalent economic and  
voting rights in the combined group.

voting rights in the combined group.
Rationale for transaction  
5. The  merging   parties  assert  that  the  merger   will  “ bring  together  a  portfolio  of  
3  The merger filing pertains to the South African activities of both BHP and Billiton and does not contain  
details of all foreign companies owned by Billiton Plc.
4  This merger has to date been conditionally approved by the ACCC, and  unconditionally approved by the  
European Commission.
5  This the parties define as the arrangement whereby BHP and Billiton have a unified management  
structure and the businesses of both BHP and Billiton are managed on a unified basis in accordance with  
the provisions of a Structure Sharing Agreement.
2

global resources with outstanding breadth and diversity .”   6   BHP and Billiton  
will, through the combined entity, reduce their risk exposure, both to political and  
commodity   fluctuations   within   their   various   markets   by   expanding   their  
geographic presence and commodity portfolio. They further argue that they will  
enjoy   greater   access   to   trading   liquidity   and   indexation   across   major   stock  
exchanges   and   international   capital   markets,   significantly   enhancing   their  
international competitiveness.
EVALUATING THE MERGER
The relevant markets 
BHP
6. Within   South   Africa,   BHP   conducts   its   activities   via   divisions,   subsidiaries,  
external companies and agencies. 7 
 Steel 
BHP is active  in South Africa  in the sale of flat  steel  products via  its wholly  
owned subsidiary, BHP Steel (Southern Africa) (Pty) Ltd. These comprise carbon  
and coated steel products. BHP Limited  produces hot and cold rolled  metallic  
coated and electrical steel sheet and coil, supplied to the vehicle manufacturing  
industries. Metallic coated and pre­painted steels are supplied to the building and  
construction,   white   goods,   office   and   general   manufacturing   industries.     BHP  
Steel SA does not produce any steel locally, instead it imports BHP’s products  
and markets them locally. 
 Coal
BHP   Limited   produces   steam/thermal   coal   but   sells   no   thermal   coal   to   South  
Africa.8  High quality metallurgical or “coking” coal represents the majority of  
BHP Limited’s production.  9 It is used in the steel industry to reduce iron ore to  
molten ore in steel. (a “reductant’ in the  manufacture of steel.) Coking coal is a  
hard   coal   and   it   is   purchased   principally   by   the   steel   industry.   BHP   imports  
“coking” coal to Iscor Steelworks in South Africa. 
6  Record, page 325
7  Once again, only those South African activities are alluded to here, there are in fact many more carried

out across their overseas operations.
8  More detail about this type of coal is described under Billiton’s coal activities.
9  The parties define coking coal as coal whose carbonization properties dictates its use in the steel­making  
process. Metallurgical coal is a broader term which includes all coals used in steel­making. (BHP Annual  
Report p 260)
3

 Exploration
BHP Minerals International Exploration Inc. is registered as an external company  
in South Africa while BHP World Exploration Inc is in the process of doing so.  
Both  companies  are purely  exploration  companies  and  sell no products within  
South Africa. 
Billiton
7. Billiton Plc conducts its activities through its worldwide subsidiaries. In South  
Africa,   it   directly   controls   two   companies,   Billiton   SA   and   Mine   &   Smelter,  
which   together   have   over   60   subsidiary   companies   within   South   Africa.   It   is  
through   these   subsidiaries   that   the   principal   business   activities   of   the   parent  
company are transacted.
The   principal   activities   of   Billiton   and   its   subsidiaries   within   South   Africa  
include:­
 Aluminium
Billiton SA is an upstream aluminum producer, producing a variety of aluminium  
products. It’s subsidiary,  Billiton Aluminium SA Limited, owns two smelters at  
Richards Bay. 
 Base metals
Billiton  SA  is involved  in  zinc mining  within  RSA  through its wholly  owned  
subsidiary, Pering Mine (Pty) Ltd. This mine is also responsible for  Billiton SA’s  
lead production, retrieving lead as a by­product of zinc. 
 Coal
Billiton SA’s coal operation is centred around “steam” (or thermal) coal, a type of  
hard coal. 10  Hard coal comprises anthracite  and bituminous coals. The largest  
users   of   steam   coal   are   electricity   and   heat   producers   since   they   require   coal  
capable of raising steam. 
Ingwe   Collieries   Limited   is   the   operating   company   for   Billiton   SA’s   coal  
10  This has the properties of containing little volatile matter and having a high fixed carbon content.
4

business.   It   operates   eight   mines   in   South   Africa   in   the   Mpumalanga   and  
KwaZulu­Natal provinces.
 Steel and ferro alloys
Billiton SA’s interest in this sector is held through a 60% interest in Samancor 11, its  
operating company and holding company for certain joint venture companies. 12 
Samancor’s three main divisions are stainless steel, manganese and chrome. 
 Stainless Steel   
Through   its   joint   venture   partnership   in   Columbus   Steel,   Billiton   produces  
stainless steel products.
 Manganese   
Billiton SA’s interest is also held via its 60% stake in Samancor.   Billiton SA  
mines ore which it sells on the open market to alloy producers. It also converts ore  
into ferro or manganese alloys which it sells to the steel industry. 13
 Chrome   
Billiton produces a range of chrome products, specifically ferro­chrome. Chrome  
is used as a raw material in stainless steel production.
 Ferro­silicon
This   material   is   used   in   the   physical   process   employed   to   separate   valuable  
minerals from the aggregate in which it is mined (“Dense Media Separation”).  
Billiton manufactures this product via Samancor.
 Titanium
This is an element formed in chemical combination with oxygen and iron. It is  
predominantly used in the pigment manufacturing industry, with marginal use for  
the manufacture of titanium metal, welding rod coatings and chemicals.
11  Samancor is the world’s largest integrated producer of chrome and manganese ores and ferroalloys with  
mines and plants located in South Africa. Billiton’s partner is Anglo­American, which holds 40%.
12  Samancor holds 33% (joint control) in the Columbus Stainless Steel joint venture in Middleburg, giving  
Billiton an effective 20% interest. ( Record p497) Its equal partners are Anglo American and the IDC.
13  Manganese metal is alloyed with many other metals. Manganese alloys are an input into steel.
5

 Titanium Feedstock   
Billiton’s involvement here is limited to its interest in Mine & Smelter, which has  
a 50% interest in Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) 14. Mine & Smelter is not active  
in the downstream market of pigment production. The final output produced by  
RBM   (“slag”)   is   sold   to   customers   using   the   chloride   process   in   pigment  
production.
 
 High purity pig iron/ductile iron   
This   is   a   by­product   of   the   production   of   titania   slag.   It   is   the   preferred   raw  
material   input   used   by   foundries   for   the   production   of   ductile   iron   castings.  
Ductile iron is predominantly sold to the automotive industry, since its primary  
use is for the production of safety­critical automotive parts, such as brake calipers  
and steering knuckles of vehicles. 
Impact on competition
8. Although both companies are involved in the steel and coal industries, there is no  
product overlap between the materials produced by or the activities of the affected  
companies within these areas. Moreover, BHP does not have any coal or steel  
production facilities within South Africa. 
9. Within South Africa, BHP SA is involved in the sale of flat steel products for the  
automotive   industry whilst  the  Billiton   Group  manufactures   and sells  stainless  
steel, which the parties maintain are distinctly distinguishable products. 
10. With respect to coal, although both companies do produce different types of hard  
coal, these coal products differ according to use, customers and markets and there  
is accordingly no overlap in this regard.
11. The   Tribunal   therefore   agrees   with   the   Commission   that   there   is   no   product  
overlap between the activities of the merging parties. 
12. Accordingly, the merger would not result in a substantial lessening of competition  
within the relevant mining or metals sectors within South Africa.
Public Interest Considerations

Public Interest Considerations
13. Only   NUMSA   initially   filed   to   participate   in   these   merger   proceedings.   They  
however subsequently withdrew their opposition to the proposed transaction after  
being assured that no job losses in the affected industries would result.
14  This is principally a titanium facility, with high purity pig iron being  produced as a by­product.
6

14. The   parties   assured   the   Tribunal   that   there   would   be   no   effect   on   Billiton  
employees   at   the   operational   level.   15  This   includes   unskilled,   semi­skilled,  
skilled  employees  and  management  at various sites,  mines and smelters.  They  
stated that the only potential impact on employment could arise at Billiton’s head  
office in Johannesburg, currently exercising central support functions on behalf of  
the   worldwide   Billiton   Group.   Such   changes   could   result   in   pursuance   of   a  
reorganization of central support functions between the principal offices of the  
combined  group.   The  exact  nature  of such reorganisation  is as yet  unknown.  
However   the   parties   submitted   that   employment   losses   would   be   confined   to  
highly   skilled   professional   personnel   with   ample   employment   opportunities  
elsewhere.
Conclusion
The Tribunal therefore endorses the Commission’s view that this merger will not result in  
the substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market. 
_____________ 4 July 2001
D.H.Lewis Date
  
Concurring: M. Holden, U. Bhoola
15  BHP only have seven employees in South Africa.
7