Roadway Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Roadway Transport (Pty) Ltd (90/LM/Oct00) [2000] ZACT 49 (18 December 2000)

55 Reportability
Competition Law

Brief Summary

Competition Law — Merger Approval — Competition Tribunal approving merger between Roadway Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Roadway Transport (Pty) Ltd without conditions — Merger involves joint venture between Unitrans Limited and Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd to enhance efficiencies in household goods logistics — Parties operate in distinct sub-markets for household and non-household goods, resulting in no competition concerns — Employees transferred without change to terms and conditions, and no public interest concerns identified.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 90/LM/Oct00
In the large merger between
Roadway Logistics (Pty) Ltd
and
Roadway Transport (Pty) Ltd
Reasons For The Competition Tribunal’s Decision
Approval
 The Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate on 13 December 2000  
approving the merger between Roadway Logistics (Pty) Ltd and Roadway Transport  
(Pty) Ltd without conditions. The reasons for approving the merger are set out below.
The merger transaction
Unitrans Limited and Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd have formed a joint venture  
called Roadway Logistics (Pty) Ltd that will acquire 50 % of the household logistics,  
distribution and warehousing division owned by Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd.
Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Unitrans Limited will jointly control Roadway  
Logistics.
Evaluating the merger
Background  
Steinhoff is a large manufacturer and distributor of furniture and household goods, which  
is transported,  warehoused and distributed  by Roadway Logistics. Although Roadway  
logistics have predominantly dealt with fellow subsidiaries within the Steinhoff Group it  
also renders these services to outside customers.
Unitrans, a diversified transport and logistics company, consists of a freight division, a  
passenger division, an express delivery service division, a fourth part logistics division  
and a motor and financial services division, which renders transportation, warehousing

and distribution services to the non­household goods sector.
According to the parties they decided to establish the joint venture, which will benefit  
from the technical expertise of Unitrans whilst maintaining its existing relationship with  
the   Steinhoff   Group,   to   enhance   product   and   cost   efficiencies.   As   a   result   the   joint  
venture will be able to compete more effectively for the household goods logistics market  
with competitors such as Berco Express, Conier Transport, Cross Cape, Freight Source  
Logistics, Sun Couriers, TransGlobe and others.
The product market
Both parties provide warehousing, transportation and distribution services. The acquiring  
firm conducts its business in the non­household goods sector and the target firm its in the  
household   goods   sector.   The   different   nature   of   the   commodities   renders   the   logistic  
services not substitutable. 
The   product   market   is   therefore   divided   into   two   sub­markets,   the   market   for   the  
warehousing,   transportation   and   distribution   for   household   goods   and   the   market   for  
warehousing, transportation and distribution for  non­household goods. 
The geographic market
The warehousing, transportation and distribution of household and non­household goods  
are conducted throughout South Africa.
Impact on competition
Within the narrowly defined sub­market for household goods the joint venture will have  
7,3% market share. In the logistic services market in general Unitrans currently has a  
market share of between 4­5% and Roadway Transport a market share of 0,4%. 
 
However, because the parties to the joint venture do not conduct their logistic services in  
the same commodity markets the merger does not raise any competition concerns.
Public interest consideration
The employees of Roadway transport will be transferred to Roadway logistics without  
any change to their terms and conditions of employment. The merger, furthermore, does

any change to their terms and conditions of employment. The merger, furthermore, does  
not raise any other public interest concerns raised in section 16(3) of the Act.
2

18   December  
2000
N.M. Manoim
Concurring: D.H. Lewis and D.R. Terblanche
3