About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg
>>
2011
>>
[2011] ZALCJHB 43
|
|
Mahlalela v Office of the Pension Fund Adjudicator (J283/2011) [2011] ZALCJHB 43 (14 June 2011)
IN THE LABOUR
COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(HELD AT
JOHANNESBURG)
CASE
NO J283/2011
BLESSING
MAHLALELA
Applicant
and
OFFICE
OF THE PENSION FUNDS ADJUDICATOR
Respondent
__________________________________________________________________________
VARIATION
OF JUDGMENT
__________________________________________________________________________
LAGRANGE, J
Introduction
It has been brought
to my attention that there is an obvious error in paragraph [10] of
the judgment in this matter which was
handed down on 23 February
2011. The following sentence appears in paragraph [10] of the
judgment:
“
When
this application was finally brought, the applicant challenged the
impending disciplinary enquiry itself
which
he had any length of
on 10 February 2011.”
(emphasis added)
The underlined
portion is clearly nonsensical and an obvious typographical error,
not picked up in final editing.
Accordingly,
paragraph [10] of the judgment is amended by the substitution of the
sentence above with the following:
“
When
this application was finally brought, the applicant challenged the
impending disciplinary enquiry itself which he had received
notice of
on 10 February 2011.”
ROBERT
LAGRANGE
JUDGE
OF THE LABOUR COURT
Date
of variation of order: 14 June 2011