Mankwe v Nowosenetz and Others (JR483/06) [2010] ZALCJHB 59 (29 July 2010)

40 Reportability

Brief Summary

Labour Law — Review of arbitration award — Application to review and set aside the award of a commissioner — Test established in Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd applied — Commissioner faced with conflicting evidence and made a credibility finding in favor of the employer — Award deemed rational and reasonable, meeting the Sidumo test — Application for review dismissed with costs.

About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg
>>
2010
>>
[2010] ZALCJHB 59
|

|

Mankwe v Nowosenetz and Others (JR483/06) [2010] ZALCJHB 59 (29 July 2010)

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
HELD
AND BRAAMFONTEIN
CASE
NO
:  JR 483/06
HEARD
AND DELIVERED
:  2009.09.16
EDITED:
29 JULY 2010
NOT REPORTABLE
In
the matter between
MOTHIBE
A
MANKWE
Applicant
And
COMMISSIONER
NOWOSENETZ

First

Respondent
CCMA
PRETORIA                                                                                    Second

Respondent
CLICKS
STORES

Third

Respondent
J U D G M E N T
PILLAY
D, J
:
This
is an application to review and set aside the award of the first
respondent commissioner.  The test set in
Sidumo
& Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others
2007 12 BLLR 1097
CC applies.  That test is
that an award is reviewable if the decision reached by the
commissioner is one that a reasonable
decision maker could not reach.
In
this case the commissioner was faced with conflicting facts.  He
had to make a credibility finding.  He preferred the
evidence of
the third respondent employer.  The applicant employee’s
evidence was substantially uncorroborated.
The award itself is
rational and reasonable.
It
meets the
Sidumo
test in that it is a reasonable award that could be reached by a
commissioner.
The
application for a review is dismissed with costs.
Pillay
D
Judge
Appearances:
For
Applicant:
Retail and Allied Workers Union: Mr Khoza
For
Respondent:       Adv M J Van As :
Instructed by Deneys Reitz