About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2014
>>
[2014] ZAGPPHC 441
|
|
Sheriff of the High Court, Rustenburg v Dintoe (51384/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 441 (29 April 2014)
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
IN
THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
(REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA)
Case No:
51384/2012
Date: 29 April
2014
In the matter
between:
THE SHERIFF OF
THE HIGH COURT
RUSTENBURG
..................................................................................................................................
Applicant
and
MOTLAGOILWE
DINTOE
.......................................................................................
Respondent/Purchaser
(ID NO: 7[...])
In
Re -
THE STANDARD BANK
OF SOUTH AFRICA
LTD
.....................................................................
Plaintiff
and
JUSTUS ALFRED
THEODOOR
BOSWEL
.........................................................................
First
Defendant
MERCIA
BOSWEL
.............................................................................................................
Second
Defendant
(ID NO: 5[...])
JUDGMENT
JANSE VAN
NIEUWENHUIZEN J
[1] This is an
application in terms of the provisions of rule 46(11) of the Uniform
rules of court.
[2]
In terms of the rule, the sheriff should file a report and an
application, which result in the incurring of unnecessary costs,
is
not necessary. [See:
Sheriff,
Hiabisa and Nongoma
y
Shobeka
2009
(6) SA 272
(KZN)].
ORDER
In the premises, I
make the following order:
1. An order is
granted in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the notice of motion.
2. “The
deposit shall be retained in trust by the Sheriff until such time as
the aforesaid property has been sold to a third
party and an
aggrieved creditor’s loss has been quantified and judgment has
been granted in respect thereof as intended by
the provisions of Rule
46(11)(b).
3. Prayers 3, 5 and
6 is dismissed.
JANSE VAN
NIEUWENHUIZEN J
JUDGE OF THE
GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA