S v Mbangeni and Another (A88/15) [2015] ZAGPPHC 83 (19 February 2015)

31 Reportability
Criminal Procedure

Brief Summary

Criminal Procedure — Right to legal representation — Irregularity in representation — Accused charged with murder; during the defence case, it was discovered that the legal representative for accused 2 was not an admitted attorney. The Acting Regional Court Magistrate referred the matter for special review, citing the irregularity as a potential miscarriage of justice. The Law Society confirmed that the representative had no right of appearance. The court held that the proceedings must be set aside due to the lack of proper legal representation, necessitating a trial de novo.

About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2015
>>
[2015] ZAGPPHC 83
|

|

S v Mbangeni and Another (A88/15) [2015] ZAGPPHC 83 (19 February 2015)

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA)
Date: 19 February
2015
Case number: A88/15
Not reportable
Not of interest to
other judges
High Court Reference
No: 820/14
Magistrates Serial
No: SH141/2014
Case No: 8/2014
MAGISTRATE
SEBOKENG
THE STATE V SOLLY
SOLOMON ZWELAKHE MBANGENI AND SARAH
MATLAKALA MATI
KANE
REVIEW JUDGMENT
POTTERILL J
[1] The accused
before the court are charged with murder. The state’s case and
accused 1’s case has been closed.
[2] During the
defence case of accused 2 the Acting Regional Court Magistrate
realised that Mr. Thoabala, acting on behalf of accused
2, was not an
admitted attorney.
[3] The Magistrate
due to the irregularity sent the matter on special review for the
proceedings to be set aside.
[4]
The
comment of the National Director of Public Prosecutions was requested
and they concurred that where a legal representative did
not have a
right to appearance the irregularity is of such a nature that it
would result in a miscarriage of justice and the proceedings
must be
set aside. They did suggest that the Magistrate enquire from the Law
Society whether Mr. Thoabala had a right of appearance
when
representing accused 2.
[5] The Law Society
has confirmed that Mr. Thoabala had no right of appearance and has
not been admitted as an attorney.
[6]
In view of the Law Society’s confirmation that Mr. Thoabala is
not an admitted attorney and has no right of appearance
a miscarriage
of justice resulted and it must follow that the proceedings must be
set aside -
S v Nkosi and Others
2000
(1) SACR 592
(T).
[7] Accordingly the
following order is made:
The
proceedings are set aside and the trial is to start
de
novo.
S.POTTERILL
JUDGE OF THE HIGH
COURT
I agree
N. KOLLAPEN
JUDGE OF THE HIGH
COURT