S v Dungan (39/2017, B222/686/2016, A99/2017) [2017] ZAGPPHC 174 (2 March 2017)

45 Reportability
Criminal Law

Brief Summary

Criminal Law — Sentencing — Contravention of Trespass Act — Accused convicted of trespassing and sentenced to a fine exceeding statutory maximum — Sentence referred for special review due to non-compliance with penalty provisions of the Trespass Act 6 of 1959 — Original sentence set aside and substituted with a lawful sentence within statutory limits.

About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2017
>>
[2017] ZAGPPHC 174
|

|

S v Dungan (39/2017, B222/686/2016, A99/2017) [2017] ZAGPPHC 174 (2 March 2017)

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA
A99/2017
2/3/2017
HIGH
COURT REVIEW NO:    39/2017
CASE
SERIAL NO:
8222/686/2016
REVIEW
REFERENCE NO.      1/4/13 JM -Rama
DATE:

22 February 2017
In
the matter between
THE
STATE
and
JABULO,
VUYO DUNGAN
REVIEW
JUDGMENT
JANSE
VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN J
1.
The accused was convicted in the Hatfield Magistrates Court of
contravening  section l(l)(a) read with sections l(1A), 1(2)
and
2 of the Trespass  Act 6 of  1959 ("'the Act")
and sentenced to a fine of R 4 000,00 or eight months imprisonment
of
which R 2 000.00 or four months imprisonment  was
suspended  for  a  period  of five years on

condition that the accused is not convicted of contravening
section 1  or 2 of Act 6 of 1959 read with section 250(1
)(d) of
Act 51 of 1977 during the period of suspension.
2.
The sentence imposed on the accused does not accord with the penalty
provisions contained in section 2 of the Act.  Section
2
provides for a fine not exceeding R 2000. 00 or a period of
imprisonment not exceeding two years or both such fine and
imprisonment.
3.
In view of the aforesaid, the court
a quo
referred the matter
to this court for a  special review in terms of the provisions
of section 304(4) of the  Criminal
Procedure Act. 51 of 1977.
4.
Having had regard to the facts
supra
I am satisfied that the
proceedings  in the court
a quo
was not in accordance
with justice and stands to be set   aside.
5.
In the premises. the following order is granted:
Order
The
sentence of  a  fine  of  R 4 000. 00 or eight
months  imprisonment  of which  R 2 000. 00
or four
months imprisonment is suspended for a period of five years  on
condition  that the accused  is not convicted
of
contravening  section 1 or 2 of  Act 6 of 1959 read with
section 250(1)(d) of Act 51 of 1977 during the period of
suspension
1s set aside and  substituted with the following sentence:
"The
accused is sentenced to a fine of R 2 000,00 or  eight
(8)  months  imprisonment of which R
1 000,00 or
four  months  imprisonment  is suspended  for a
period of five years on condition that the
accused  is  not
convicted  of contravening section 1 or  2 of Act 6 of
1959 read  with section
250(l)(d)  of Act 51  of 1977
during the  period of
suspension."
________________________
N
Janse van  Nieuwenhuizen
Judge
of the High Court of South Africa
Gauteng
Division, Pretoria
I
agree and it is so ordered
________________________
H
J de Vos
Judge
of the, High Court of South Africa
Gauteng
Division, Pretoria