Roan Coal (Pty) Limited v Nonyane NO and Others (55323/17) [2018] ZAGPPHC 275 (31 January 2018)

30 Reportability
Civil Procedure

Brief Summary

Court Procedure — Urgent Applications — Dismissal of application — Applicant sought urgent relief but application dismissed with costs — Judge provided extempore judgment with reasons on record — No further reasons required post-dismissal as they were adequately addressed during the hearing.

About SAFLII
Databases
Search
Terms of Use
RSS Feeds
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2018
>>
[2018] ZAGPPHC 275
|

|

Roan Coal (Pty) Limited v Nonyane NO and Others (55323/17) [2018] ZAGPPHC 275 (31 January 2018)

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA
CASE
NO: 55323/17
DATE:
31/01/2018
In
the matter between:
ROAN
COAL (PTY)
LIMITED
Applicant
and
TH
NONYANE NO and
OTHERS
Respondents
JUDGMENT
Tuchten
J
:
1
I today received a written request dated 24 August
2017 to provide
reasons for an order I made in the urgent motion court on 23 August
2017. I think I received the same request same
time ago and conveyed
a written response through my Registrar. I shall repeat that
response.
2
I dismissed the application with costs. I gave an
extempore
judgment at the conclusion of argument. My reasons are therefore
on record and can, I assume, be transcribed. I have nothing to add.
__________________
NB
Tuchten
Judge
of the High Court
31
January 2018
Roan55325.17