Semantis Law Reports

My Library

Maholela v Road Accident Fund (5250/2024) [2026] ZAMPMBHC 99 (31 August 2026)

Delict — Motor vehicle accident — Passenger claim for damages — Plaintiff sustaining injuries and claiming loss of earnings — Court finding 100% liability on the defendant due to lack of evidence to the contrary — Expert evidence from industrial psychologist and actuary accepted, leading to substantial damages awarded for loss of earnings despite challenges to the reliability of the evidence.

Personal Injury
Score: 65

ASI Capital (Pty) Ltd v TMS Pro Property Management CC (2025/026341) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1006 (31 August 2026)

Costs — Security for costs — Application for security for costs by defendant under rule 47(3) of the Uniform Rules of Court — Plaintiff's cessation of trading and inability to pay costs if unsuccessful — Court finding sufficient reason to believe that plaintiff will be unable to pay defendant's costs — Security ordered, with amount and manner to be determined by the Registrar.

Civil Procedure
Score: 62

Chuma v Road Accident Fund (A23/25) [2026] ZAMPMBHC 98 (31 August 2026)

Delict — Motor vehicle accident — Appeal against dismissal of claim for future loss of earnings — Trial court erroneously finding that appellant retained pre-accident earning capacity based on incorrect assumption of educational qualifications — Appeal court determining that appellant's injuries significantly compromised her earning capacity — Appeal upheld with damages awarded for future loss of earnings calculated at R3 667 781.70.

Delict
Score: 62

Malamani Mining and Exploration (Pty) Ltd v Batshweneng Communal Property Association and Others (2026/167870) [2026] ZANWHC 225 (31 August 2026)

Interdict — Interim interdict — Urgent application for interdict restraining removal of historical rock dumps pending mineral rights dispute — Applicant claiming prima facie right to material based on prospecting right and agreement with landowner — Court finding prima facie right established, apprehension of irreparable harm, and balance of convenience favouring applicant — Rule nisi granted with interim effect.

Mining Law
Score: 62

Ntukela v Department of Correctional Services and Others (JR2044/21) [2026] ZALCJHB 290 (31 August 2026)

Labour Law — Unfair Labour Practice — Review of arbitration award — Applicant seeking to set aside award finding no unfair labour practice in promotion dispute — Evidence showing change in selection criteria without authority — Court finding that the first respondent acted unfairly by not promoting the applicant based on improper criteria — Award set aside and applicant entitled to appropriate relief.

Labour Law
Score: 62

Sebenza Agri Investments (Pty) Ltd v NDF (Pty) Ltd and Others (HCAA 21/2026 ; HCAA 22/2026) [2026] ZALMPPHC 87 (31 August 2026)

Land Law — Lease Agreements — Competing claims to farming properties — Appellant seeking to set aside judgments declaring 2017 lease valid and 2025 lease invalid — Court finding that the 2017 lease was valid despite alleged lack of authority and statutory non-compliance — Eviction order granted against appellant based on validity of 2017 lease — Appeal dismissed.

Land and Property Law
Score: 62

Van Wyk v Road Accident Fund (1745/2022) [2026] ZAFSHC 409 (31 August 2026)

Delict — Road Accident Fund — Claim for future loss of income — Plaintiff injured in motor vehicle accident — Court determining liability at 100% in favor of plaintiff — Expert evidence presented regarding impact of injuries on plaintiff's earning capacity — Court awarding damages for loss of earnings amounting to R1 488 342.90, with interest and future medical costs to be covered by the defendant.

Delict
Score: 62

Bosch v Bosch B Consult (Pty) Limited and Another (CT02628ADJ2026) [2026] COMPTRI 102 (31 August 2026)

Company Law — Name registration — Confusingly similar names — Application by Robert Bosch GmbH to compel BOSCH B Consult (Pty) Limited to change its name — First Respondent's name incorporating the Applicant's registered trademarks — Court finding that the name is confusingly similar and misleading to the public — Order granted for the First Respondent to change its name to one not incorporating the Applicant's trademarks.

Company Law
Score: 60

Democratic Alliance v Municipal Dermacation Board and Others (076447/2026) [2026] ZAGPPHC 1001 (31 August 2026)

Municipal Law — Delimitation of municipal wards — Review of delimitation process by Municipal Demarcation Board — Democratic Alliance challenging final delimitation on grounds of procedural unfairness and lack of rationality — Court finding that statutory procedures were followed and that the delimitation was rationally connected to the information before the Board — Application dismissed.

Municipal Law
Score: 60

Dhanraj v Gomis and Others (2025/211597) [2026] ZAWCHC 455 (31 August 2026)

Contract — Specific performance — Auction mandate — Respondents failing to countersign conditions of sale after auction — Court finding that auction mandate was valid and binding despite respondents' claims of lack of consensus — Specific performance granted compelling transfer of property to applicant — Stay of proceedings refused as respondents failed to establish grounds for such relief.

Contract Law
Score: 60

Ex Parte Oladayo (095647-2026) [2026] ZAGPPHC 1053 (31 August 2026)

Legal Practice — Admission as attorney — Applicant seeking admission as an attorney after failing to comply with Rule 22.1.5 of the Legal Practice Act regarding involvement in other business entities during Practical Vocational Training — Court emphasizing the necessity of prior written consent from the Legal Practice Council for such involvement — Application denied due to non-compliance with statutory requirements and lack of clarity regarding business interests.

Legal Practice
Score: 60

F.J.R v E.R and Others (Review) (2024/033724) [2026] ZAGPPHC 1032 (31 August 2026)

Domestic Violence — Review of Magistrate's ruling — Applicant seeking to review a ruling on the admissibility of documents in Domestic Violence proceedings — Magistrate ruling that certain documents were protected by legal professional privilege — Court finding that the review is permissible under the Superior Courts Act and that the ruling was made in gross irregularity — Order set aside and matter remitted for reconsideration.

Family Law
Score: 60