Semantis Law Reports

My Library

Troskie v S (Appeal) (A49/2026) [2026] ZAWCHC 458 (31 August 2026)

Criminal Law — Assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm — Appellant convicted of two counts of assault against his girlfriend — Evidence presented included testimony from the complainant and corroborating witnesses — Appellant's appeal against conviction dismissed as the trial court's findings were upheld, with no merit found in the grounds of appeal.

Criminal Law
Score: 60

Van Wyk v Road Accident Fund (088486/24) [2026] ZAGPPHC 982 (31 August 2026)

Delict — Road Accident Fund — Damages for personal injuries — Plaintiff seeking damages for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision — Court granting default judgment in favor of Plaintiff — Defendant held liable for 100% of proven damages — Future medical expenses awarded in terms of section 17 of the Road Accident Fund Act — Evidence admitted by affidavit under Rule 38(2) due to Defendant's non-participation.

Delict
Score: 60

B and B Media (Pty) Ltd v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Another (2024/036398) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1007 (31 August 2026)

Administrative Law — Municipal Services — Billing Dispute — Applicant seeking relief regarding disputed electricity account — City failing to resolve complaint lodged in February 2022 — Court refusing to grant relief for meter replacement and billing adjustments, ordering instead that City Manager determine the pending appeal and provide a revised statement of account — Court emphasizing the need for the City to investigate and respond to the applicant's complaint.

Administrative Law
Score: 55

Bruiners v S (Appeal) (A38/2025) [2026] ZAWCHC 462 (31 August 2026)

Criminal Law — Sentencing — Appeal against life sentence for murder — Appellant convicted of premeditated murder while acting in common purpose — Court a quo failing to consider cumulative effect of personal circumstances and time spent in custody — Appeal dismissed, life sentence confirmed as no substantial and compelling circumstances found to justify deviation from minimum sentence.

Criminal Law
Score: 55

City of Cape Town Municipality v Beukes and Others (2025/056009) [2026] ZAWCHC 457 (31 August 2026)

Eviction — Unlawful occupation — Prevention of Illegal Eviction from Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 — City of Cape Town seeking eviction of respondents from property — Respondents claiming historical ties to property — Court finding respondents in unlawful occupation and eviction just and equitable — Interdict granted to prevent re-entry after eviction.

Land and Property Law
Score: 55

Dermal Institute of SA (Pty) v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services (2020-52890) [2026] ZAGPPHC 973 (31 August 2026)

Customs and Excise — Customs valuation — Appeal against value determination — Applicant contending that trade discount should not be included in customs value — Respondent asserting that discount is preferential and should be included — Court finding that the primary basis for customs value is the transaction value, which includes the discount — Value determination by the respondent set aside.

Customs and Excise
Score: 55

Ex Parte: Masango (CT02930ADJ2026) [2026] COMPTRI 109 (31 August 2026)

Service — Substituted service — Application for substituted service under Regulation 7(3)(a) of the Companies Act — Applicant unable to locate Respondent's address for service — Court permitting service via email, WhatsApp, or social media as adequate means of communication — Order granted for substituted service.

Company Law
Score: 55

MIC Khulisani Ventures (Pty) Ltd v Livestock Wealth (Pty) Ltd (Leave to Appeal) (2024/129396) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1015 (31 August 2026)

Liquidation — Leave to appeal — Section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act — Respondent seeking leave to appeal against liquidation order — Court determining whether a genuine and reasonable dispute existed regarding the debt — Court finding that Livestock failed to demonstrate a bona fide dispute on reasonable grounds — Leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Insolvency Law
Score: 55

Moodley v Melomed Claremont Hospital (Pty) Ltd t/a Melomed Tokai (14649/2024) [2026] ZAWCHC 510 (31 August 2026)

Civil Procedure — Withdrawal of action — Uniform Rule 41(1)(a) — Plaintiff seeking to withdraw action after set-down without consent of defendant or leave of court — Court granting leave to withdraw but addressing scale of costs — Tender of party-and-party costs not binding on court — Plaintiff's continued prosecution of action after practical purpose had lapsed deemed vexatious — Punitive costs awarded on attorney-and-client scale for period post-mootness.

Civil Procedure
Score: 55

Seale v Aurora Place Body Corporate and Another (Appeal) (A111/2026) [2026] ZAWCHC 456 (31 August 2026)

Sectional title — Body corporate — Liability for repair and replacement of prepaid water meter — Appellant claiming body corporate responsible for maintenance post-warranty — Court finding prescribed management rule 29(3) does not impose continuing obligation on body corporate after installation — Appeal dismissed as legally correct despite adjudicator's failure to interpret rule properly.

Land and Property Law
Score: 55

Thompson v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. (2024/096791) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1008 (31 August 2026)

Administrative Law — Municipal Billing Dispute — Applicant challenging the accuracy of water services billing by the City of Johannesburg after property transfer — City acknowledging a credit due but failing to resolve the applicant's disputes — Court refusing substantive relief due to lack of proof and ordering the City to determine the applicant's appeal — Live dispute exists regarding specific invoices and credit balance.

Administrative Law
Score: 55

BMW Financial Services (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v Moreku Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/020898) [2026] ZAGPJHC 992 (31 August 2026)

Civil Procedure — Exception — Particulars of claim — Defendants excepting to plaintiff's claim on grounds of vagueness and lack of necessary averments — Court finding that particulars comply with rule 18(6) of the Uniform Rules of Court — Exception dismissed as defendants failed to show that no cause of action is disclosed.

Civil Procedure
Score: 45