Rautenbach & Others v The Governing Body of die Hoërskool DF Malan & Another — [2025] ZASCA 78 — 2025-06-04
2025-06-04; Case No 073/2024; Rautenbach & Others v The Governing Body of die Hoërskool DF Malan & Another (073/2024) [2025] ZASCA 78 (4 June 2025)
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA; MOKGOHLOA, MBATHA, WEINER, SMITH JJA, MODIBA AJA
Reportable
This case addresses administrative law with a focus on procedural fairness as outlined in section 3 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000. It examines the rationality behind the decision to change the name of a school and interprets whether the South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 grants the governing body the authority to effect such a change.
The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel, where so employed.
Cases: Head of Department, Department of Education, Free State Province v Welkom High School and Others; Chairpersons’ Association v Minister of Arts and Culture and Others; Biowatch Trust v Registrar, Genetic Resources and Others
Legislation: Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000; South African Schools Act 84 of 1996
The governing body of DF Malan High School made the decision to change the school's name due to its historical association with apartheid. This decision was reached after a consultative process that involved various stakeholders, including parents, learners, and alumni. The appellants contested this decision, arguing that it exceeded the governing body's powers and that the consultative process lacked fairness.
The primary issues before the court were whether the governing body possessed the implied authority to change the school's name and whether the consultative process undertaken was fair and rational.
The court concluded that the governing body acted within its implied powers as conferred by the Schools Act. It determined that the consultative process was both comprehensive and fair, thereby validating the decision to change the school's name. The court found that the decision was rationally connected to the information available to the governing body at the time.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
The ruling establishes that the governing body has implied powers to change the school's name, grounded in its fiduciary duties and governance responsibilities under the Schools Act. Furthermore, it emphasizes that procedural fairness must be evaluated in light of the specific circumstances surrounding each case.